UPDATE: NASCAR strikes back at Mauricia Grant with a 29-page report.
8/12/2008
As we peek in on the latest episode in the Mauricia Grant vs NASCAR imbroglio, NASCAR has struck back with a 29-page response defending itself against Grant's $225 million discrimination lawsuit. If the details of the rebuttal are true, then Grant has some big time explaining to do.
NASCAR's key assertion is that Grant never filed a single complaint about any harrassment she allegedly endured throughout her time at NASCAR. Further, NASCAR claims that Grant often described herself using racial stereotypes and was repeatedly reprimanded for tardiness and other behavioral problems. Read more.
Mauricia Grant, a former "technical inspector," has filed a $225 million dollar lawsuit against NASCAR. Grant claims that she was routinely subjected to sexual and racial harassment and that when she finally complained to her bosses, NASCAR fired her.
If the details are true, Grant's story tears the covers off a workplace more like an old boys club than a premiere sports organization. What Grant describes is a workplace hell that anyone who's experienced sexual or racial harassment knows well.
For NASCAR, more than money may be at stake. As Grant's experiences fly in the face of NASCAR's efforts to portray itself as an organization that welcomes black people. ...
Racism and Sports
Mauricia Grant, pictured here working during the Stater Bros 300 in 2006, is suing NASCAR for $225 million, alleging racial and sexual discrimination, sexual harassment and wrongful termination. Click through to see other racially charged incidents from recent sports history.
Mike Basso, US Presswire
In a newspaper nterview in April, Los Angeles Angels star Torii Hunter said he had heard racial taunts from Red Sox fans at Fenway Park in the past.
Lisa Blumenfeld, Getty Images
Kosuke Fukudome has become a sensation in his first season in Chicago, but shirts emblazoned with a stereotypical caricature of Asians and the words "Horry Kow" (a play on ex-Cubs announcer Harry Caray's home run call) offended the Japanese outfielder.
Nam Y. Huh, AP
Earlier this year Golf Channel analyst Kelly Tilghman said on air that other golfers should "lynch [Tiger Woods] in a back alley" to better compete with him. In the aftermath, Golfweek Magazine ran a cover with a hanging noose, for which editor Dave Seanor was fired.
Golfweek / AP
Radio host Don Imus caused a stir in 2007 when he referred to members of the Rutgers women's basketball team as "nappy-headed hos." CBS canceled his long-running show 'Imus in the Morning,' but he returned to airwaves with ABC later in the year.
Spencer Platt, Getty Images
Rush Limbaugh was hired as a commentator for ESPN's NFL pre-game show Sunday Countdown, but he lasted only a few weeks after implying that Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb received great praise mostly because he was black.
Getty Images
Former golfer and current CBS commentator Bobby Clampett made waves at this year's Masters when he referred to golfer Liang Wen-Chong as "the Chinaman" on air.
Mike Powell, Allsport / Getty Images
African soccer players, like Cameroon international Samuel Eto'o, are often the targets of racially charged taunts in Spain. Fans of Real Zaragoza made monkey-like chants at the Barcelona striker during a 2005 match, and he nearly walked off the pitch during a match against the club the next season.
Phillippe Desmazes, AFP / Getty Images
In an interview with HBO's Real Sports last summer, former Yankees outfielder Gary Sheffield claimed that manager Joe Torre gave white players preferential treatment during his time in New York and said that biracial shortstop Derek Jeter wasn't "all the way black."
Mark Mainz, Getty Images
John Rocker's inflammatory comments in a 2000 Sports Illustrated article made him one of the most despised athletes in recent memory. Rocker described riding the New York subway as "looking like you're riding through Beirut next to some kid with purple hair, next to some queer with AIDS."
Matt Campbell, AFP / Getty Images
Grant's allegations are very specific and she claims to have kept detailed notes about what went down. NASCAR on the other hand is not denying Grant's account, but claims Human Resources "didn't know" about Grant's situation.
The lawsuit states Grant was subjected to "virulently racist harassment, a racially hostile work environment and insidious and pervasive race discrimination reflective of a former, uglier era in our nation's history."
The lawsuit also states Grant was subjected to "lewd and obscene sexual harassment, a sexually hostile work environment and rampant gender discrimination." It goes on to state that all manner of NASCAR officials, including supervisors, "perpetuated, condoned and actively participated in perverted and disgusting sexual conduct designed to demean and diminish (Grant) and the handful of other women employed by NASCAR as officials."
Grant, who was the only black female official and began with NASCAR in January 2005, said in the suit she was fired for her "poor work performance" but said she had received positive performance evaluations and had received no warnings aside from one about her use of "street" language.
She contends in the suit that NASCAR officials would send her obscene e-mails or text messages, such as this from official David Duke last November: "I love all Yall mofos, i am that nigga, HAHAHA, Holla, PIMPALICIOUS." Or, she contends, Duke would say in her presence, "What up, my nigga?"Some commenters on other sites, say Grant should have just quit or toughened up. They say that she stayed just long enough to gather evidence for a lawsuit. What do you think? Should she be suing? Or should she have just walked away and gone to the press or NASCAR executives?
When she complained to NASCAR officials, Grant told USA TODAY on Tuesday, "I was basically told to deal with it because the men that I was working with, a lot of them were military men and I needed to learn how to act like they act if I wanted to be successful.
"I felt like I was in it by myself and that I had to make an attitude adjustment. It hurt because I basically just tried to do my job and tried to avoid co-workers. I was hurt and disgusted by the whole thing."
"I don't want this (lawsuit) to be my legacy as the first African-American female to do this job," Grant told USA TODAY. "I did (the job) in a way that I can hold my head up high with pride. That doesn't mean I have to put up with race discrimination or sexism or retaliation."


Comments: (124)
Add a comment
By: K.M. on 6/14/2008 1:56PM
Come on!! Good ole boys. Confederate flags. Beer. Ignorance. Inbreeding. Should we really be surprised?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Dr. Davis on 6/14/2008 3:48PM
Racism has existed in our everyday lives for years and years to come. At what point do we put an end to this type of adolescence and try to accept the fact that this world is home to billions of genders,races, nationalities ect.....This is the number one reason that I nor do my kids watch NASCAR Racing or go to the tracks to see it.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Redman on 6/14/2008 4:02PM
Shouldn't we wait just a little before assuming this is legit? The only allegations I've seen are one-on-one events. If the Duke case taught us anything it should be a little patience. Let's try not to ruin any careers without a little actual proof, eh?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Barry on 6/14/2008 4:53PM
Ms Grant
The "Good Ole Boy's need a wake up call in todays world..I am a 56 year old white male and am tired of seeing and hearing of racial discrimination..I support you in your lawsuit..I do not feel it is about the "money" You stand up strong and I hope you are successful...STOP THE DISCRIMINATION...I have seen enough...Good Luck to you
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JUNEBUGG on 6/14/2008 6:27PM
racism and discrimination is alive well in america. its everywhere on every job
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JUNEBUGG on 6/14/2008 6:26PM
racism and discrimination is alive well in america. its everywhere on every job
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JUNEBUGG on 6/14/2008 6:42PM
#39---- ARE YOU WORKING AT BOJANGLES ... you go work AT BOJANGLES YOU MORON BUTT HEAD....
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Carol McElroy on 6/16/2008 2:03AM
I only have a suggestion for any person who may experience sexual harassment, racial slurs, or other offensive or inappropriate conduct within the workplace, notwithstanding color, gender, etc., and that is “paper trail.” Immediately memo your personnel or human resources department requesting an appointment to discuss the matter (be specific in memo). Make sure you “cc” (carbon copy—or these days, just copy) your supervisor, company president or owner, and even a coworker who witnessed this conduct at the bottom of your memo. (i.e., cc: Brian France, Chairman/NASCAR). You could even cc your attorney in this situation. It is important to issue copies of your memo because it is highly unlikely that a company would be able to deny that notice was ever received. In fact, it is more likely that an immediate investigation into the matter and/or action toward the offender(s) would be initiated. Also, write a “follow-up” memo after the appointment, copying the same people, to “recount” what occurred with personnel, “confirm” their course of action, and request that they advise you of the status of their investigation. If you feel that personnel was not sensitive to your complaint, in the memo, advise that if this inappropriate behavior continues, you will turn the matter over to your attorney.
I mention this only because it may be difficult for Mauricia Grant to prove her allegations in court—true or not. And I would say that no matter what my race.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Vernon on 6/14/2008 7:27PM
Phillip what agency does white people get their welfare from ? Just because there is a sport that whites fear Blacks will dominate the hate and prejudice raises its ugly head. White people can run but you cannot hide and as long as Blacks have the right to compete we will dominate. Better get use to it Phil ole Boy !
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: elle on 6/15/2008 1:00AM
So that's what they mean by the poll, white working men
won't vote for Barack. "He's too liberal, and he doesn't share my values" Translation:He is a threat to our way of life. We're not ready to let go of all elements of Jim Crow.
What extactly are their values? They couldn't tell you honestly, without admitting to their deep seeded prejudicies. Some of these people forefathers walked out of their segergated churches, and went off to view a lynching, with the excitement as if they were going to a circus! It pisses me off that the news media buy into the southern baptist thing. They're no more religious than any other christian!
So let "the good ole boys" stay like they are STUCK! vote for McCain. Pay the $10 for gas for your pick-ups. Continue to whine about high health care etc. etc. The rest of us is moving on!
Reply to this Comment | Report This