There was no "WOW" moment produced during Friday's highly-anticipated debate between the two men who would be president. But that doesn't mean the first face-to-face showdown between Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain didn't provide a fascinating look at the politics of belittling the opponent.
It was difficult to keep track of the number of times the Arizona Republican stamped Obama as lacking knowledge, not having the foresight, missing the point, or just being too inexperienced on a number of topics key to running the country ranging from talking tough to Pakistan's leaders to the importance of winning the war in Iraq. ...
It was a tissue-paper thin strategy by McCain to turn the youthfulness of the junior senator from Illinois into a liability.
But McCain ran into one huge problem.
Obama showed a far more thorough command of the facts. Whether the subject turned to the federal bailout plan, the Russia-Georgia conflict, or the lessons of the Iraq war, Obama displayed a calm, reasoned rationale while keeping his occasional elitist tones in check.
And to his credit, Obama was the only candidate on the stage to even address issues like sending your kids to college, filling your gas tank, and providing affordable health care for Americans. You know, the kinds of subjects you and I deal with every day.
Even if you disagreed with his answers, it would be hard to say Obama lacks the temperament to lead this nation – especially against the presidential backdrop provided by the Bush Administration.
After its failure Friday, maybe McCain will drop that page from his playbook. I wouldn't bet on it, however, because painting a minority as being just a step behind the curve is as old as the hills.
The talking down tactic McCain laid down on Obama was nothing more than a campaign strategy, I know. But excuse me for wincing more than once as it struck a personal chord.
I'm sure I'm not the only black man who heard in McCain's tones the criticism of white co-workers or supervisors, sometimes directed at me – other times at other minorities, questioning whether we "had what it takes" or "if we fully grasped the situation" because we merely questioned how or why a particular deed or task was performed. We might have even had the audacity to suggest a new approach.
Maybe I'm just a little over-sensitive – seeing how close this man of African descent is to becoming our president. Maybe I'm feeling a little overprotective. But I think I'm justified.
Let's be honest for a second, no matter who you plan to vote for. After watching Friday night's debate and recalling the past 8 years of Republican leadership, during which our incredible shrinking president has brought us a nation where gas prices rise, home values fall, and even the Wall Street crowd is in a near panic, how can anyone in their right mind challenge Obama's intelligence or readiness for office?
Ready for more honesty?
If the polls are to be believed, how the hell is this election this close?
__________________
Paul Shepard blogs the Democrat side of the election for BlackVoices. He has been a journalist for 16 years; on the national urban/minority affairs beat for The Cleveland Plain Dealer and for The AP in Washington, D.C.More Election Coverage
+ The Debate Barely Heard Around The U.S.
In Black Voices Community
+ THE DEBATE IS ON AND POPPIN!
+ Who won the debate?


Comments: (39)
Add a comment
By: WENDY on 9/28/2008 7:26PM
Please, past this along. Obama is using great ways to keep people in the know. Are you registered? Find out by using the web address below:
https://www.voteforchange.com/index_obama.php?secure=ofa
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: LATRINA on 9/29/2008 1:31AM
AMERIACA VOTERS ARE BEING PLAYED LIKE FOOLS SARAH PALIN IS NOT IN THE RUN FOR VICE PRESIDENT THE REPUBLICANS PUT HER IN JUST FOR VOTES IF MCLAIN WIN SHE GONE COME UP WITH SOME EXCUSE AND DROP OUT FOWL ISAY FOWL MOVE REPUBLICANS WITHDRAW ALL YOUR MONIES FROM THE BANKS AND INVEST INHOME SAFES AND LARGE SECURITY DOGS AND HIGH TECH SYSTEMS AND PROTECT YOUR OWN BECAUSE AMERICA IS TURNING INTO A COMMUNTIST COUNTRY WAIT AND SEE
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ann on 9/29/2008 7:30AM
The person that commented about blacks would vote for Mickey Mouse because he is black, is showing that he doesn't have any knowledge of African Americans, we have proven that we are intelligent, free thinker, and acheivers. If Mickey Mouse platform, an campain dealth with the issues that Obama does, YES, I would vote for MICKEY MOUSE instead of McCain. Its obivous that you would vote for Casper the Ghost!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lisa S Stewart on 9/29/2008 10:33AM
I agree with Shepard's analysis, and in response to his last statement, "...how in the hell is this election close?" One word - RACISM. Had Obama been a white man, and all else being the same (state of the country, etc.) this election would be no contest. A sad fact, even in light of everything Obama has already accomplished. We already know that blacks have to be 10X better to achieve 1/2 of the recognition. McCain's inability/unwillingness to look Obama in the eye, or even in his direction, showed his contempt for the fact that Obama was even standing beside him. And I thought Hillary and Bill were arrogant - McCain takes it to another level.
And no, please DO NOT BELIEVE THE POLLS - I feel sure that they're part of the ploy in which a "close election" will be called, and once again stolen!!
Go-Bama!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lisa Bland on 9/29/2008 12:04PM
I am tired of hearing that BLACK people are only voting for Barack Obama because he is BLACK. I'm voting for OBAMA simply because he SAID ENOUGH!!!!!. Thats right, ENOUGH of the republicans, we can barely feed our children because of the mess that the republicans have gotten the AMERICAN PEOPLE IN. EIGHT IS ENOUGH!!!!!! As far as the debate, Barack won hands down. The most irritating part of the debate was McCain's continuous comment of Barack's inexperience in foreign policy. WITH ALL THE EXPERIENE THAT HE (they)(McCAIN/BUSH)HAVE WHY DOES AMERICA HAVE A DEBT IN THE TRILLION? With all the experience that they have in handling foreign affairs, why are we trying to borrow $750 BILLION DOLLARS TO SECURE AMERICAN CORPORATIONS ON WALL STREET? WHY ARE THE ALREADY WEATHY BROKERS RECEIVING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN BONUSES? WE ALL NOW KNOW WHAT THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND I TO SAY ENOUGH, VOTE FOR BARACK
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Darrell on 9/30/2008 1:27AM
This debate was suppose to be in line with McCains strong suit Foriegn policy and diplomatic experience. He was suppose to be able to wipe the floor with Obama on this subject with just experience alone. At the end what we saw was a virtual tie. Points to Obama
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Dan on 10/12/2008 9:25PM
McCain was very disrespectful to Obama because he would not look at him directly. McCain is arrogant and he acted like he was above everyone and owned no one respect. McCain is the wrong choice and he lacks the judgement needed for the position.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: C. MYERS on 9/30/2008 3:15PM
WHEN ALL OF THE TRUTH COMES OUT ABOUT ACORN AND THE FANNIE AND FREDDIE MAC DEBACLE, WHICH COULD END UP COSTING TAXPAYERS OVER 500 BILLION, OBAMA AND HIS LYING DEMOCRATIC CRONIES WILL CRASH AND BURN.
DO THE DUE DILLIGENCE, UNLESS YOU WANT TO FOLLOW THIS SLICK TALKING LAWYER, LIKE A BUNCH OF LEMMINGS INTO THE SEA OF FINANCIAL DISASTER.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mrs. T on 10/09/2008 9:07AM
It truly is a shame that the Republican camp would allow to Palin to "with the element of intent" insight and subborne what she is turning toward race riots in various locations throught our "United" States. Is this truly leadership qualities for a country or a cult?
Reply to this Comment | Report This