I'll say it right up front. I support gay marriage. So I guess it's a good thing that I live in California since it is now legal for gay couples to marry here. Well legal for the month at least. You see, Proposition 8 on the California ballot seeks to end gay marriage rights; and the proponents of Prop 8 are counting on black Californians, expected to come out in droves to vote for Barack Obama, to push their closed-minded initiative over the top.That projection disturbs me on so many levels, but Professor of Law at American University, Darren Hutchinson of the blog "Dissenting Justice", believes that if blacks vote down gay marriage, they are engaging in constitutional bigotry. ...
Although Obama opposes the California ballot initiative, Project Marriage, an organization that favors the measure, believes his candidacy could help its cause. The organization hopes that Obama will bring out enough black socially conservative and evangelical voters who, though Democrats, are pro-life, antigay, and committed to conservative religious values. Black religious conservatives, unlike white evangelicals, tend to vote for Democrats, due to the party's more liberal record on civil rights in modern U.S. history. But conservative organizations have successfully exploited social conservatism among blacks to advance discriminatory agendas, particularly in the area of gay rights. This has created some highly unusual political coalitions. One black minister from Chicago, for instance, boldly proclaimed that he would march with the Ku Klux Klan in order to protest the legalization of same-sex marriage (yes - this really happened).
Further Hutchinson argues that blacks voting to ban gay marriage are cutting off their noses to spite their faces.
My argument does not seek to equate homophobia and racism (a misguided analogy that gay rights advocates frequently invoke), but rather to demonstrate that they both constitute gross departures from the norms of equal protection and due process that are central to any progressive and anti-racist understanding of the constitution. Because anti-gay laws and policies undermine and erode these norms, black homophobia is inevitably anti-black.I would also add that when Democratic politicians (regardless of race) oppose same-sex marriage, they too legitimize discrimination.
Hutchinson has written an insightful article. I recommend you read it in its entirety.


Comments: (100)
Add a comment
By: Rob on 10/29/2008 11:19PM
While the scripture may sound clear, the debate actually surrounds the use of the Greek word that this particular version of the Bible translates as "homosexual offenders." The term is "arsenokoite." Some say that it is a reference to male prostitutes rather than to two committed homosexuals. Yet, others argue that Paul, who wrote the passage, would not have repeated "male prostitutes" twice. Even others argue that the two root words in arsenokoite are the same terms used to prohibit any premarital or extramarital sexual relations, so they may not refer to homosexual relations alone.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Rob on 10/29/2008 11:21PM
While the scripture may sound clear, the debate actually surrounds the use of the Greek word that this particular version of the Bible translates as "homosexual offenders." The term is "arsenokoite." Some say that it is a reference to male prostitutes rather than to two committed homosexuals. Yet, others argue that Paul, who wrote the passage, would not have repeated "male prostitutes" twice. Even others argue that the two root words in arsenokoite are the same terms used to prohibit any premarital or extramarital sexual relations, so they may not refer to homosexual relations alone.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: How You Should Vote on 10/29/2008 11:34PM
http://www.caladvocate.com/archives/articles2008/Oct052008.asp
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jewel on 11/13/2008 2:23AM
Where did the data come from that proves that blacks and latinos overwhelmingly supported proposition 8? What about whites, who are usually the majority in any vote?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jennifer Anderson on 11/14/2008 3:09PM
I would not be quoting the story of Sodom and Gomorrah as a compass to morality any longer. The man called Lot from that story offered up his daughters for gang rape, yet he was called righteous. After they escape, the daughters want to get him drunk and have their way with their father. The story isn't anti-gay. It's against rape and against mistreatment of a guest.
Furthermore, citing procreation as the reason homosexuality is immoral is a weak argument coming from straight people who use birth control, who have oral sex etc. There are plenty of straight people having sex for reasons other than procreation.
Furthermore, it is obviously not a choice of a "lifestyle" as there are animals that mate with same sex partners- for life. There are even gay penguins in a zoo.
Get over it. It doesn't affect you.
You can believe it is immoral and have that religious freedom- others should have the freedom to believe it is NOT immoral and to have the same right of marriage.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Confused on 11/17/2008 6:44PM
I would just like to remind gay people that african americans (at one point known as SLAVES!) have actually died and sacrificed in helping to make the united states what it is today. Stand on youre own two feet and fight youre fight. dont start calling us homophobic and say we are part of the problem for youre questionable crusade. You want to compare...ok! Lets take a good portion of gay people and wake them up in the middle of the night,strip them of everything the own and their families, put them in a semi, take them to the coast put them on a ship with nothing and ship them to another part of the world, make them slaves and hundreds of years later...then lets have this conversation. If you want to fight youre fight, fight it but dont call me and every other african american homophobic because we dont agree. And FYI, youre not scoring any points by pissing off african americans! Just a thought.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Nrthdude1 on 12/03/2008 10:21PM
In October of 2007, the Gay Community was tired of Barack Obama's lukewarm response to their attempts to meet with him regarding Gay rights.
They took out a full page advertisement in the Philadelphia Enquirer and divided it into two columns - one for Hillary Clinton, one for Barack Obama. They listed all outreach efforts, interviews, et al that each candidate had made on behalf of the Gay Community. Hillary's was crammed full top to bottom. Barack Obama's? Blank.
And now he is talking about placing Colin Powell in some important post in his administration. Colin Powell, who was responsible for preventing Bill Clinton from overturning the ban against Gays in the military.
Civil unions are not federally recognized and therefore do not provide anywhere near the protections and benfits that straight married couples receive.
In most states in the USA, a gay person can be fired or evicted for no reason except for prejudice, and have no legal protection, no governmental protection.
Did you know that 600,000 Gay people were murdered in Nazi Concentration camps? That's right, 600,000.
The Gay concentration victims were forced to wear pink triangles - that's were the symbol for the Gay Community came from - bet you didn't know that.
I guess civil rights aren't for everybody -just for racial minorities....
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JO on 12/04/2008 10:44AM
Homosexuals say they were born that way and transsexuals say they were born incorrectly. Interesting...
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Garry Crowe on 12/04/2008 8:00PM
According to the news of the election decision in California, almost 70% of black voted to ban gay marriage. Jon Stewart got it right when he mentioned last week, 'Hmmmm, methinks the oppressed become the oppressee'. We love you Coretta Scott King, John Lewis, Andrew Young-help us in our struggle as we helped you! Discrimination is discrimination at any level. You target a group for discrimation, & you may be next.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Dena Leichnitz on 12/17/2008 3:52AM
Please don't equate interracial marriage with gay marriage. If I marry a White man (and there are a few I have my eye on if you want to know the truth!) I can have babies until the cows come home! If I lay up with a woman I am not doing anything but getting my jollies and nothing more! Skin color has nothing to do with whether a man and a woman can fulfill the purpose of marriage-to have children. Gender has everything to do with it. Marriage is about children...period. And just because not everyone who is married will have children doesn't negate the purpose. The purpose of a house is to live in it. Having bad plumbing and a faulty foundation doesn't change the purpose of the house. It just means you have a crappy house. Those who promote gay marriage do so on a faulty foundation! They do so on lies, emotions and guilt.
I am Black! I am Republican! I am Mormon! I am Conservative! And I am proud of all four things! Deal with it!
Reply to this Comment | Report This