Beyond her rainbow diversity goodness, she's been lauded by both the left and the right as someone who is committed to making smart modernizations to the U.S. Labor movement. She's especially appealing to progressives who wonder if they'll have a seat in Obama's increasingly centrist Cabinet.Worker's Rights are Human Rights
It's no surprise that she's on everybody's short list for Labor Secretary. Even Rep. David Bonior, whose also been put in the running for the job thinks she should get it. Many AFL-CIO leaders agree.
Even the Wall Street Journal is weighing in with an overall positive take on Maxwell:
Some labor leaders from both the AFL-CIO and Change to Win, a splinter union group led by the Service Employees International Union, back her as a consensus choice, citing her efforts on behalf of legislation to allow unionization at workplaces with the signing of cards, not secret balloting.Surprisingly, the Human Rights Campaign, in what many are calling a misstep, decided to endorse another candidate for the Labor Secretary position initially:
But guess which prominent gay rights group with a history of not supporting openly gay candidates backed somebody else?
Oh, Human Rights Campaign, you never fail to disappoint.
The HRC had endorsed Rep. Linda Sanchez for the post and suddenly realizing that "Hey! Maybe we ought to support this highly qualified Maxwell lady since you know, we've never had an openly gay person serve in a Cabinet-level position and what is it we do exactly again?" they decided to endorse both Sanchez and Maxwell. source
Maxwell is not quite a "done deal" however. Some argue that a more established politico, like a Governor, is what America most needs at the helm right now:
But Maxwell faces one big hurdle: star power. Given the wattage of Hillary Rodham Clinton at State, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano at Homeland Security, New York Fed President Timothy Geithner at Treasury, and Robert Gates continuing on as secretary of defense, many union leaders believe they need someone of more stature, such as a governor, even if that governor doesn't have the liberal and activist credentials of Maxwell. Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm and Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius are being vetted for the job, along with Maxwell. sourceSo the choice comes down to Obama choosing a relative newcomer, rising star like himself or someone with a more traditional trajectory in politics. I say, go with change.


Comments: (58)
Add a comment
By: DanR on 12/08/2008 9:49AM
Obama is nuts, and we thought Bush was nuts.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Regina on 12/08/2008 12:58PM
It is NOT ok for gays to marry OR show public affection!!! I do not want my kids seeing that...They should have NO right to show public displays of affection in front of other peoples children..PERIOD
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: John Meade on 12/08/2008 7:05PM
Oh boy! I guess a witch will be hired next!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Eric on 12/09/2008 4:22AM
DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH! IT IS TIME WE EMBRACE IT.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Tracie on 12/09/2008 3:03PM
What about Barney Frank? He's as gay as they come. Of course B.O. is doing this. Why not stir the pot some more? He's an idiot. I can't believe we have an unkown nobody for the next president. Don't blame me, I voted Republican. You libs can only blame yourselves when everything goes to Hell in a handbasket, and it will.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Elizabeth Garraway on 12/09/2008 3:44PM
We have freedom of speech, but who is smart enough to win the majority of votes to become president? Guess someone is jealous.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: danny66 on 12/09/2008 6:17PM
I am All up for diversity and i believe obama will help the country but does he need to put a gay person to fill the job? i dont think that is good. Even more gayness is gross.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Cherubim on 12/09/2008 10:16PM
President-Elect Barack Obama has chosen, mostly, Wall Street promoters and corporate lawyers to be in his cabinet. He hasn't included anyone who knows how to interact and relate with everyday American citizens, and then report back to him concerning: (1) what the people need, and (2) whether his administration’s new initiatives are working. During the Great Depression, Eleanor Roosevelt fulfilled this role for President Franklin D. Roosevelt. I nominate Senator John Edwards for this role. John Edwards would be a refreshing change. Is not change what Obama s supposed to be about? As a rival of Barack Obama, for the Democratic Party Presidential nomination, John Edwards, consistently spoke up for average Americans, i.e. Main Street, not Wall Street. During his “Road to One America Poverty Tour” John Edwards demonstrated that he is uniquely qualified for this role.
The video evidence follows:
He has walked with and comforted people whose homes were being foreclosed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i_GWrYkcCI
Defined the “Great Moral Test of Our Generation”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS1x88ZmohM
He has visited workers employed in the new renewal energy economy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50yOR5bvMV0
John Edwards is, also, the only candidate for President that actually went down to New Orleans on several occasions and worked along side those striving to try to bring back the areas that remain so devastated from the effects of Hurricane Katrina:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAqktFnA4nk&feature=PlayList&p=EB1EC8919DC5DC52&index=0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DaofQCkbA8
Reply to this Comment | Report This