Tuesday night's prime time political event displayed the power of President Obama's delivery, where he takes the Democrats and where the Republicans need to go from here.President Barack Obama addressed the Congress and America last night to recap the first meaningful legislative effort by this historic administration. In order to sell the merits of his plan, the president spoke to many sections of a suffering America, addressing the need for renewable energy, greater educational achievements, and the consistent flow of credit within our economic markets.
The president reminded both America and Congress that there will be sacrifices that all must make, including himself. He reminded America that there will be times in the future that we will disagree on the methods to use to improve our great land. He praised the courage of the military while calling out the lack of civic responsibility shown by high school dropouts, pointing out that those individuals let themselves and their countrymen down by giving up on their education.
Obama spoke with the power of an orator, the presence of a statesman, and the connectivity of America's professorial neighbor. If his four-year term can be equated to the World Series of Politics, Obama won game 1 in a Bob Gibson-like fashion, taking command early on his home turf and never relinquishing it.
Then there was Bobby Jindal.
The governor from Louisiana has been widely praised as a rising star within the Republican Party. As such, he received the monumental task of delivering the response to the president's first major address of his administration. He was asked to match the passion and delivery of a master speaker to balance the scale back towards Republicans, showing that the minority party still has the relevancy and creativity that America needs to turn the tide of this national crisis.If Obama spoke to Congress and the nation with the persona of a historic orator, Jindal gave the GOP response with the passion of a high school biology lecture video on Petri dish experiments.
Much of America has a hard time connecting with the Republican Party at this juncture because of the party's inability to build strong ties of trust and confidence between itself and the America electorate. In contrast to Obama's heart-felt, impassioned speech, Jindal's address came across as canned, typical, and sterile, using the phrase such as "...American can do anything..." to a point where any initial emotional zing from the sentiment was eventually lost in a sea of blandness and typical rhetoric.
Even Jindal's "mea culpa" on behalf of the Republican Party to rebuild trust was washed away within a matter of sentences once he continued his address by mischaracterizing President Obama's call for action where the president said steps must be quickly enacted or else "...we may not be able to reverse..." its effects.
Jindal had some good points, such as the need for more competitive and successful schools for American children, using the steps put into place in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina as an example. However, Jindal talked more from a philosophical point of view at a time when a large portion of America is too frightened for their current situations to engage in theory and speculate on their future.
Even though both men spoke to visionary paths that the country should take, each took different paths to get us there. Both men spoke to instilling confidence in this shaken country, but only one was successful in providing it. Both men spoke to renewing the world esteem and excellence of America, but only one provided the primetime colorful picture that Americans needed to see at a time where their confidence is compromised.
And both men are considered rock stars within their own respective political parties, but one showed how much contrast there is between masterfully articulating a vision and a message versus dryly talking to a philosophical view.
____________________
Lenny McAllister is a Republican political commentator and guest co-host for Fox News - Charlotte's morning show "Fox News Rising," where his commentary can be seen every Monday. His website is lennymcallister.com

Comments: (111)
Add a comment
By: E Joyce on 2/27/2009 12:48PM
I find your comments to be condescending and fixed on the premise that your point of view is the correct one. The reality is that almost every African American is either bi-racial or tri-racial, but what does that really have to do with character, qualifications and agenda. The Republicans are in a tailspin, yet they keep doing what they've always done. Using disingenuous wannabes -- Steele, Jindal, Palin -- to prop up the premise of providing artificial sweeteners to the GOP pot, is just not enough to make it taste any better. You complain about who got selected for what, I think President Obama actually looked at their resumes. People with their own political agendas SHOULD have turned down cabinet opportunnities, and nothing further should be read into it. As yet another armchair quarterback, I hope that you are planning to get in the game and do something yourself. The notion of change is all inclusive.
Report This
By: commonsenseandawareness on 2/26/2009 5:33PM
To Margaret Jackson, kingdawgg, and SassyHunay. Whew, it took me a little while to decipher those slang names. Anyway. if you three had paid attention to detail to my comment you would have noticed that I did not say that B.H.O. should have an all black cabinet, nor did I say that he needs to only help blacks. I did not vote for him, but I hope that he succeeds. I am an Independent. What I said was that B.H.O. did not appoint any blacks to any top cabinet positions except for Eric Holder. Now, What is wrong with this picture? Even our former President George W. Bush appointed a black female and a black male to the second highest position in the country, and Pres. Bush is a non bi-partisan, right wing republican who only votes along party lines. Does Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell ring a bell? Well it should. Now that I have cleared up your flawed and scarred opinions, I will move on. I am from a state that has a recently retired black federal judge named U.W.Clemons, who was the first black to be appointed as a federal judge, and he was appointed by a white, hillbilly, democrat ex- president named Jimmy Carter. In the state where I reside there is also a black congressman by the name of Artur Davis, who attended Harvard with B.H.O. and is a close friend of B.H.O. and his wife. Yet, when congressman Davis was offered the position of attorney general(the position that Eric Holder is in), congressman Davis turned it down because he said he did not want to be indebted to the "White House insiders". This speaks volumes considering the relationship between congressman Davis and B.H.O. Now congressman Davis has annouced his bid to run for governor of our great and wonderful state in an attempt to be the first black to be elected to this office. More power to him. I think that maybe congressman Davis knows something more about B.H.O. than we will ever know. I hope that B.H.O. succeeds and delivers. I understand him and where he is coming from. I am Bi-racial. The product of an african-american/puerto rican father and irish/caucasian mother. I was born and reared in New Haven, Connecticut, and moved to the present great state where I reside at the age of 20 years oldwith my parents to work in my mother and father's company. I was fortunate to have been reared my whole life with my mother and father in the home, and my mother and father never spent a night away from each other until my father passed away with cancer. I understand what B.H.O has dealt with, but it seems that he has overlooked some important black figures that could have easily brought new light to the administration by having a top position in the cabinet. When the stimulus money is distributed to the states for infrastructure projects, I hope that B.H.O. stresses that blacks, hispanics, asians and other minority contractors be given fair and equal acknowledgement during the bidding process in order to receive city, state, county, and federal contracts to perform work on infrastructure projects. Like I said, I hope that B.H.O. delivers, but you all need to look beneath the
surfsce. As far as the three names that I mentioned during the opening of my comment, Please read the comments and opinions posted on this page carefully and in detail before you decide to reply to or comment on. I am certain that after you have done this, your comments will have somewhat of a bit more substance, and myself and other readers can reply to, or comment on your opinions with at least a smidgen of interest.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: commonsenseandawareness on 2/26/2009 5:42PM
Do people actually live in Louisiana. I thought that was a place where people just went to party. Oh my fault. I forgot. That is where little weezy, and master p is from. oops,my fault.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jimmy Biddle on 2/27/2009 9:40AM
Is that supposed to be funny? Rude I think, what point does that prove?
Report This
By: sanG on 2/26/2009 7:02PM
To:Common, Who-thinks-he-has-sense-and-awareness, but IS and apparently HAS BEEN living under a rock - PLEASE SNAP OUT OF IT ! You are such easy prey for THE PARTY of DIVIDE and CONQUER. I'm gonna pray for you. Let us stop criticizing The President's extreme accomplishment, excellent communication skills and revolutionary plans and find a good way to be constructive rather then waste time on negativity.
As for Jinhdal, I'm just shaking my head.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: commonsenseandawareness on 2/27/2009 1:01PM
This reply is for sanG. I appreciate the fact that you used the appropriate words in your comment when describing B.H.O. The words that I am referring to are "EXTREME AND REVOLUTIONARY." Hey, I must congratulate you,you have the right idea. Let me present this as a plausible argument:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA is an EXTREMIST and
REVOLUTIONARY
EXTREMISTS and REVOLUTIONARIES are SOCIALISTS
and COMMUNISTS
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA is a SOCIALIST and a
COMMUNIST.
You said it sanG, not me.
Report This
By: marymack on 2/26/2009 11:05PM
We as Black Americans(because a lot of us don't check the African American box anymore)really don't give a hoot about who Obama caters to or shake hands with...the man is bi-racial by God and he is no more black than he is white...he is both,so quit trying to divide us and move on and get down to things you can do to help America and the economy...I came out of retirement and I also have a disability,but I started my own business selling poetry,so I can help our country and our President...so whoever you are....mr.uwouldn't nocommonsense if it hit you in your stupid face....Buy a poem,get a job,do something besides hate on President Obama.THE MAN IS MARRIED TO A BEAUTIFUL,INTELLIGENT,BLACK WOMAN...WHAT MORE DO YOU PEOPLE WANT...BLOOD?!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: commonsenseandawareness on 2/27/2009 10:47AM
I, like you, have every right to express my opinions and beliefs as I choose, as long as I am not inciting violence or committing a criminal act. First of all, If had read my comment with some commonsenseandawareness you would have noticed that I too, am Bi-racial, and I am gainfully employed as CFO of my parent's company. Congrats on your skills as a poet. As a contributor to the school of literary thought, Here is a poem for you:
SPEAK AS YOU PLEASE,
AND DO AS YOU DO,
YOUR OPINION HOLDS NO VALUE,
AND NEITHER DO YOU.
I WILL CLOSE FOR NOW,
WITH A FINAL NOTE OF TRUTH,
I REALLY, REALLY,
FEEL SORRY FOR YOU.
Report This
By: Jessie on 2/26/2009 10:35PM
Dear JabirAbdulLatifAlim
"How can republicans call themselves fiscal conservatives; and don't blink an eye over monies spent on weapons r+d and war." If you do a little research you'll find Democrats as well as Republicans have used weapons spending and war to bring us out of recessions historically as of course that spending does create and retain jobs during a time of war. At the time some people did not appreciate weapons spending during Reagan's terms. They did appreciate getting out of the Carter recessions and when we went into Iraq both times even the world was amazed at how well those weapons performed and how quickly the Iraqi military was decimated.
"I just bet you all missed the parts about fiscal oversight. How about a budget that gets scrutinized line by line to weed out wasteful unnecessary spending? how about holding elected officials accountable for abusing taxpayers bailout funds?" Perhaps you missed the part about Daschle and Geithner not paying their taxes and ending up not having to pay penalties and interest as everyone else would. Maybe you missed all the pork Obama signed for or pushed for in the previous two near trillion dollar bills. Yes, great oversight and great watch to stop unnecessary programs. Trillions being spent, little to create jobs.
"Now, tell us "other americans"how trickle down economics prevented all of those jobs from going overseas and mexico." Ahh NAFTA, the bill signed into law by Bill Clinton. This was an adjustment necessary due to the lack of new workforce versus retirees. As usual the government overdid it. BTW. I've seen people that were once wealthy in unemployment lines. If nothing else the benefit of this poor economy will perhaps teach America's youth the value of a job. How can you even mention republican spending considering the Party Democrats are having spending money borrowed for the next two generations. Historic deficits never before accomplished. Shameful.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Naja on 2/27/2009 7:30AM
This was a great article. It expressed my sentiments exactly.
Reply to this Comment | Report This