I never knew how much people loved their Big Macs, Twinkies and candy bars. The mere suggestion by me that a small tax on fattening foods would be a smart way to help finance the cost of fixing America's broken health care system sent some readers into rants, questioning my sense of fairness, intelligence and even my parentage.
I stand 100 percent behind my mother and father who did a fine job raising me. And while I wasn't a straight-A student in school, my tests scores weren't anything to run away from.
However, questions about the basic fairness of a proposed fat-food tax have the most merit – and therefore deserve answers.
Even critics of the tax concept agree that overweight, unhealthy folks strain our health care system with disproportionate rates of diabetes, heart disease and other maladies. And delivering quality health care to this segment of the population ends up costing us all.
So why not make the food producers who make huge profits but create this unhealthy situation pay their fair share? You can't tax someone for being fat in America, but you can tax the people who are making Americans fat.
Folks who smoke tobacco or who drink alcohol pay taxes on the products they imbibe to their health's detriment. It is time for fat-food producers and consumers to do the same.
The argument comes back. "I have the right to be fat, so leave me alone."
Of course you have a right to be as large, fat and unhealthful as you want. But when it costs me in skyrocketing health care costs and jeopardizes the financial futures of generations to come, then it is my business.
The same "stay-out-of-my-business" arguments were used when seat belts were made mandatory. And that logic applies here. I shouldn't have to pay higher car insurance premiums because you get in an accident.
Second, just a few pennies tariff added to a wide range of fattening foods would raise billions in added revenue.
I must admit that seeing the government (and it doesn't matter who is president) get its hands on new pots of money makes me a little queasy. Waste, fraud and mismanagement could end up eating away much of the new money stream. But for now, the issue is raising the funds to fix health care. And taxing fattening foods would do it.


Comments: (7)
Add a comment
By: kcn9971 on 6/18/2009 9:59PM
For those in favor of a junk food tax, I ask... when has the Government ever taken our tax money and spent it wisely?? The only thing they will do with this money is use it for more "Pork" projects and more reckless spending. Giving Washington more money is like giving a teenager a credit card. The last thing it will ever be used for is giving Americans good health care
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ray on 6/21/2009 3:37AM
I'd be in favor of a fast food tax, because it seems to be the only way to force these companies into self regulating themselves from buying cheaper processed foods and serving it to the masses and marketing it as if it was a culinary delight with no side effects or health concerns. Goverments will always look to gain financial gains in any way they can. But to make mcdonalds give up selling processed foods.....priceless!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: kcn9971 on 6/21/2009 1:21PM
What right does the Govt. have to FORCE companies to pay for their "pork" projects. It's people like you who would welcome a totalitarian Government. Why are you so afraid to make your own decisions without having "Big Brother" make it for you. It's the same argument with cigaretts; They don't want you to smoke, but yet they won't make cigaretts illegal...so what do they do...TAX you. The same applies for fast food. If it's dangerous..then make it illegal. It's nothing but Govt. extortion. If you believe in it so much YOU pay the taxes!!!
Report This
By: vfig2004 on 6/21/2009 6:55AM
No, I don't feel fast food should be premium taxed:
- A tax would affect lower income ppl - fast food an inexpensive meal or social outing for many families; added cost could hurt.
- Behavior is cause of bad health, not food. Eat fast food sparingly, watch portion sizes, exercise and health should be OK.
- Such a tax would create more bureaucracy and waste in government; it could also create another layer of management within fast food companies and guess who'll end up paying for it?
Us - the already stressed out and overburdened taxpayer.
Enough already!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Kristen Altbaum on 7/27/2009 12:55AM
It’s time America did away with employer paid healthcare plans, individual plans, Medicaid and Medicare. We need a total revamp of the system, paid for, by taxing all processed food in America. Foods that should NOT be taxed: fruits, vegetables, nuts, beans, whole grains, meat and dairy should be government subsidized to the extent that local farmers, dairies and butchers can provide these foods whenever possible.
Processed foods, on the other hand, SHOULD be taxed…BIG. A common sense system, such as this, would:
- Generate the taxes necessary to provide healthcare for ALL Americans, rich and poor, young and old.
- Reduce global warming by eliminating some of the demand (manufacturing, packaging and transport) of processed food.
- Reduce healthcare costs by decreasing future demand.
- Increase the future productivity and ingenuity of America as a whole.
Continuing our current system, but requiring that the rich pay for the poor, will do NOTHING to change the overall health of our nation. We ARE what we eat. As long as government makes it easy to make unhealthy choices, many of us will choose to do so, dooming ourselves and our planet at the same time.
It’s time we do something drastic to help our health, economy and environment. Being economically enticed to eat more raw foods would do wonders. We need to feel good, be proud of ourselves and go back to being a country the rest of the world admires.
Kristen Altbaum
Lafayette, CA
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: 1984 on 7/30/2009 9:00PM
This is absolutely ridiculous. A "junk food" tax will not regulate the production standards of foods. It is purely and simply a way to generate government revenue. The government has no right to regulate what foods you do and do not put into your body. The citizens of this country need to stand up and say enough is enough. Taxing fast food to keep us healthy. What's next? I personally believe this goes beyond revenue. We as a nation have lost our way. The first three words of the U.S. Constitution are "We the People not We the government.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Gayla on 10/27/2010 3:36PM
So the real problem is the healthcare in our country. If you are really poor you can get free healthcare and do what you will with it. If you are wealthy or work for a business or corporation you can get health care. If you are in between or work P/T or for yourself , its too expensive to get healthcare. Who's coming up with a workable solution to the in between hard worker?
All kinds of people eat junk,not just the poor. When are we going to work together? If we set a bill in motion perhaps it should be on a 4yr trail basis to see if it does what it's meant to do, then reevaluate, and make changes thereafter
Reply to this Comment | Report This