
News that for the first time an HIV vaccine has had some success in protecting people from the disease is severely tempered by news out of St. Louis County that a 40-year-old African American male is being held on $200,000 cash bond on six counts of recklessly risking infection of another with HIV. The news of the vaccine shows how far we've come in the battle against HIV, but the arrest of this St. Louis County man shows how much further we have to go in educating the public.
Prosecutors say that Orlando A. Hadley had numerous sexual encounters with a woman and did not reveal his HIV status to her. The woman later tested positive for HIV. Now, police are polling the public to see who else may have had sexual contact with Hadley.
Let's be clear, not being honest with your sexual partner about your HIV status is terrible. Individuals, though, must learn to take steps to protect themselves from sexually transmitted diseases, regardless of what our partner tells you. The advance in HIV/AIDS medications has turned the disease into more of a chronic condition for some, but just because living with HIV/AIDS is easier doesn't mean we should let down our guards.
"Quite frankly, this kind of prosecution misses the boat and does harm. Outside of rape, it takes two people to transmit the disease," Phill Wilson, president and CEO of the Black AIDS Institute in Los Angeles, told Black Voices in an interview. "This says to folks, 'I don't have to protect myself.' What would be healthier is to change the conversation to address how it is each of our responsibilities to protect ourselves."
It's a conversation that needs to happen now because HIV and AIDS is ravaging the African American community. According to the Centers for Disease Control, African Americans account for 51 percent of new HIV/AIDS diagnoses. African Americans also account for 48 percent of people living with HIV/AIDS. At the end of 2007, 40 percent of the people with AIDS who died were African American.
These horrible statistics point to the fact that we are not doing enough to protect ourselves. Reducing the number of partners we have and always using condoms are good places to start. We need to address the terrible problem of intravenous drug use in our communities and also the stigma against homosexuality and HIV/AIDS. According to the CDC, in a recent study of men who have sex with men in five cities, 46 percent were HIV positive and 67 percent were unaware of their infection.
Because of the way people with this disease are treated, some may choose not to know their status despite the consequences.
"There are people that are HIV positive and don't want to believe it and ignore it. There are people that know or suspect their partner is involved in high-risk behavior and don't protect themselves," Wilson said.
This is more of a moral issue than a legal issue, except in rare cases when an individual seems to be repeatedly and purposely infecting others. Putting this one man behind bars will not go as far as continued and strengthened outreach to those who are most at risk.


Comments: (46)
Add a comment
By: Connie on 9/30/2009 8:42AM
If we arrest this man for knowingly transmitting disease, then we need to arrest countless parents that have held or attended "Swine Flu Parties" to purposely infect their children with the deadly influenza.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Kiara W on 10/01/2009 11:56AM
If you knowingly have sexual intercourse with someone when you have a sexually transmitted disease and transmit that disease to that person, I feel as though there should be a course of legal action your partner should be able to take. Especially with HIV, a person that is intentionally putting a person at risk to get a disease that will more than likely led to a painful and horrible death, should be prosecuted. Its like murdering someone. Yes the other person took a risk, yet regardless of that fact, any religious argument, and speculation of the person's sexual habits, their partner of choice willfully and knowingly withheld information that could have possibly led their partner to make a different choice with their lives.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: thickness on 3/21/2010 10:50AM
well i iknow this man i use to deal with him back in the day. just think he could have been in my path at the present time.but i noticed something about him that wasnt right no means no. i pray and hope there wasnt to many woman that he dealt with and im praying for the ones he has had sex with. bu im kinda of wondering will those woman come forth or will they be to ashamed.daddy-o aka orlando hadley was a sick man. he will burn in hell for this.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Regina on 2/16/2010 11:55AM
We should all remember that just because it is important that we all take preventive measures to protected ourselves from HIV or STD infections, this does not give an infected individual, who knows of their infection, the right to expose another. Shared responsibility is a wonderful theory but it doesn't take away the responsibility of the infected community to protect others from a disease they know they have the potential to spread. Those of us who test positive for HIV are told at the time of our positive test how this disease is spread and what precautions to take to virtually eliminate the spread of the infection. There are no excuses for someone who knowingly exposes another to this disease so lets just stop asking why and start requiring people to do their part in stopping the spread of this disease.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Kiara on 3/29/2010 8:23PM
Past prevention efforts have been effective in changing behaviors that in turn have slowed the epidemic overall. However, some high-risk behaviors such as unprotected sex continue at far too high a rate among those not infected as well as those infected.
source: http://simplestdtesting.com/resources/
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ADMR on 11/26/2010 1:51PM
Let's Be Clear...SEE.......This is News From Over 1 Year Ago - Simply Disgusting
Reply to this Comment | Report This