The problem, however, is that President Obama's seemingly hyper-rational decision was ultimately a bit irrational when compared with prior decisions. With all the political capital Obama lost by supporting Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, he could have at least been a bit slower to pull out the sword to undermine Paterson's power as governor of New York.
Here are some quick thoughts on the Obama/Paterson debacle last week:
1) Why take a stand on Gates and then run for cover on Paterson? Gates does not hold public office, and Obama should have known that he would not gain a single point of approval from white America by supporting a black man in a scuffle against the police. The situation was made worse when it turned out that Gates was challenging a police officer known for his degree of racial sensitivity. If you're willing to allow yourself to get politically body slammed for a Harvard crony, it doesn't make sense to pass over the chance to support a brother (Paterson) who may actually regain enough political power to make a difference.
2) Paterson is already having a tough time without another powerful black man working to embarrass him. New York's economy, which relied heavily on tax revenue from Wall Street, is in shambles. The New York State Senate is in complete disarray. Paterson is getting legal challenges on his appointment of lieutenant governor. I must ask whether it was necessary to kick a black politician when he's down, or if there was another way this situation could have been handled. Last week, during my conversation with Rev. Al Sharpton on his radio show, a caller asked an incredibly profound question, saying, "If Obama's popularity is low in 2012, will he step aside and let Hillary run?" I honestly don't think he would.
3) Timing is everything. Was this really the right time, Mr. President? I am not sure why the president couldn't have waited a few months before asking Gov. Paterson to step down. One can certainly understand the need to maintain congressional and Senate majorities, but waiting a while or not saying anything at all could have allowed the situation to play itself out. Sure, having the weight of the president behind Paterson's public dismissal certainly expedites his political homicide, but I am still confused as to why Obama only chose Paterson as the target of such ruthless behavior. There are other Democratic governors suffering in the polls, and Obama has said almost nothing about their situations.
4) Could the leak have been any sloppier? Who let the story out just two days before the president was to visit New York? Would it have helped if Paterson and Obama had a private conversation? In light of Paterson's public disregard for Obama's orders, as well as the NAACP stepping in to help him, I simply can't imagine how this distraction has been productive for anyone.
5) Does race matter at all, or is blackness only acceptable when politically convenient? I am the first to understand President Obama's loyalties to the Democratic Party. The question, though, is whether there is a point in which it's okay for a black leader to stand up for another one. Not that race should be the only deciding factor in weighty political decisions, but one must wonder if there is ever a time when we will stop pretending that we live in a post-racial society. Rush Limbaugh has quickly reminded us that such a society does not yet exist, at least not in America.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is a professor at Syracuse University, a leading African American speaker and author of the forthcoming book 'Black American Money.' To have Dr. Boyce's commentary delivered to your e-mail, please click here. 


Comments: (41)
Add a comment
By: Allie on 9/26/2009 5:55PM
As a New York State resident, I believe that Paterson is a total incompetent. But, I also believe that it is up to the residents of New York State to address the issue,not the President of the United States of America. It may have been politically expedient for Obama to let news of his feelings leak (does he have feelings of his own?) but it was wrong. It was disrespectful, unprofessional and unethical to do this to a sitting governor and he would not have done this to a White man. The people of New York State are more than capable of selecting their own governor.
I have supported President Obama and I have argued against the disrespect being shown him and now he does the same thing to someone else. People will remember this stunt and it will come back to bite him in the butt. Respect is a two-way street.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: E. Jaime on 10/02/2009 3:04PM
BHO ( our president ), is a dissappointment to say the least. That Gates incident was a no brainer. Being the Leader of the free world he should have looked around at his surroundings. He's the president of America. A minority that reached such high office he has already won in so many ways. Whitie with his good ol' boy's club lost that old prejudice prestigue. Yet BHO ' collaberated ' his words completely incorrect. Our president has shown not to have any back bone, leaving our troops on Afghanistan in harms way. Seriously no once of reallity with this Jimmy Carter version. Very dissappointing, maybe the slap to his ego that was kindly applied by the Olympic committee will put things in perspective. Mr. President nobody respects a leader that isn't familliar with his country's strengths. Be our President not popular enigma.
Report This
By: Tim & Marsha on 9/26/2009 7:24PM
So it would've been okay with you if this had been a White Governor? You're only upset because it was a Black Governor? Unbelievable and it just proves that there are Black Racists also.
Yes, it is up to the voters to decide who they want as their elected officials, but it is also up to the Democratic Party to make sure that there is a viable candidate to compete. And this is nothing new to Politics. Where have you been???
Because the Media has become an industry that tries to shape the news rather than just reporting it, they saw an opportunity to make this an issue about race. And just like another African American who lacks wisdom, Michael Steele, you chose to jump on the bandwagon. So clearly you have double standards because as your article implies, if it is a Black official, he or she should not be called out for their ineptness. "He's already having a tough time"??? Priceless. You also say that "There are other Democratic governors suffering in the polls, and Obama has said almost nothing about their situations." What does 'almost' mean? What factual information are you basing this statement on? Is it because you haven't heard about it in the news, or is it just not on your radar because they are not Black? This just goes to show that a person can be academically smart and lack true wisdom at the same time.
The President was elected as the leader of this Country and believe it or not, that includes Whites, Hispanics, Native Americans and Asians too. We need the strongest leaders--not based on their race or ethnicity, but on their abilities. And until people like you can understand this, there will always be a level of bigotry in this Country.
So should we expect to see an article from you anytime the President does something that is not to your liking involving a Black person during his entire term? Or do you think maybe it's a good idea to let the man do his job, which is to lead the entire Country--not just the African American population--out of this mess we were put in by the last Administration? That's what we plan to do.
And we don't need Limbaugh as a reminder that we are not even close to a post-racial society. You yourself have proven that. Where is your outrage for the Census worker who was found in Kentucky hanging, hog-tied, naked and with the word "Fed" written on his chest? Oh, I get it--he wasn't Black so not worthy of your concern.
Tim & Marsha, and yes, we're African American
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: monique on 9/30/2009 10:17PM
Whenever someone writes a statement that ends with "yes, we're african american" that means that the person has some serious racial issues. Does being black make your stupid comment special or more legitimate? Would it have less meaning if you were white? Ironically, by going out of your way to state that you're black and using this to validate your point, you are supporting Dr. Watkins point that race does matter in politics and in life.
Report This
By: monique on 9/27/2009 11:24PM
Whenever someone writes a statement that ends with "yes, we're african american" that means that the person has some serious racial issues. Does being black make your stupid comment special or more legitimate? Would it have less meaning if you were white? Ironically, by going out of your way to state that you're black and using this to validate your point, you are supporting Dr. Watkins point that race does matter in politics and in life.
Report This
By: triciagirl on 9/30/2009 10:17PM
What I love is how Tim and Marsha write their blog entries together. Now that's priceless? Do you guys share a brain or something?
Report This
By: triciagirl on 9/27/2009 11:26PM
Why do you write your blog entries together? Do you share a brain too? Does Tim own the brain or does Marsha?
Report This
By: SmoothSmitty on 9/29/2009 8:47PM
Tim & Marsha, I totally agree with everything you
posted inregards to this blog, and I'm sure you're going to get a lot of negative response for it. In my circle I often remind my friends that the Prez is'nt exclusive just to african-americans but to all americans, and he has a commitment to the democratic party to keep it strong. Just like the republicans has a commitment to keep their party strong. (even though I beleive they are really hurting theirselves with this self-inflected pain of racism.) But for some reason or an other they (some not all of my friends) can't grasp the reality of politics. It's funny it almost seems that they expect the prez to morph into some Martin Luther King and Malcom X or something.
Report This
By: truthbetold on 10/01/2009 1:31PM
I agree with everything you said except calling blacks racist. Black american people don't have the ability to be racist. We can be discriminatory, and prejudiced, but we can not be racist. We are not in any position of power to deprive anyone of civil liberties. The institutionalized racism throughout the whole country, world, against the american negro is tremedous and all we can do as blacks is react to the condition we were put into. Yes, some of us discriminate and are prejudice, but racist we are not. That's just another lie perpetrated by racist whites, trying to turn it around on us. They know they are lying when they use they word racist, or just ignorant themselves. Look up the definition of racism.
Report This
By: que on 9/26/2009 8:16PM
if he is president of all america why are black folk visited to talk ahout health care seen him in your community oe your perents community explaining issues.ever seen him on a sunday show talking to a black jurnalist .have you seen BV,THE ROOT,asr these question.have you seen him in your alumni news letter saying he visited your school
HOWARD is down the street havent been to that school mike steel did all the people mean all the people not just mobil home communities we just wont the guy toserve us all the CBC comes from
local communities so he cant tell them he wont suport them they dont care they take care of local business so we can still elect our congressman
we see them all the time black folk are not fox news stop blacklisting us
Reply to this Comment | Report This