
I am disgusted that Whoopi Goldberg and 100 other Hollywood celebrities have declared their support for admitted pedophile director Roman Polanski. Hollywood is rallying around Polanski following his arrest in Switzerland on outstanding charges here in the United States. Somehow, Goldberg and others seem to think that money and talent mean you should skate scott free, even if you admit to forced anal and vaginal penetration of a drunk and drugged 13-year-old girl.
Goldberg, star of 'The Color Purple' and 'Sister Act,' said, "I know it wasn't rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don't believe it was rape-rape."
Whoopi, there is only one kind of rape, and Polanski committed it.
Goldberg goes on to acknowledge Polanski's crime, but then appears to condone Polanski's fleeing the country in 1978 to escape sentencing:
He pled guilty to having sex with a minor, and he went to jail, and when they let him out, he said, "You know what, this guy's going to give me 100 years in jail. I'm not staying.'"And that's why he left.
So, okay, I get it. Polanski didn't like his odds, so he just opted out of the criminal justice system? Someone please explain to me what is alright about that? Whoopi and the other Polanski apologists need to read the original plea agreement. Polanski took the plea knowing that the judge would render whatever sentence he deemed appropriate. When it was time to face the music, Polanski chickened out
Right now, there's a petition circulating in Hollywood in support of Polanski that has collected more than 100 signatures. I am not surprised that Woody Allen signed it, but I am surprised to find names such as Martin Scorsese, Pedro Almodovar and David Lynch on a petition demanding Polanski's release.
I see a lot of factors informing the actions of the Polanski apologists: I see the devaluation of women and the elevation of wealth and whiteness.
How do you think Spike Lee would be treated in this same situation? Or even more harmless Tyler Perry?
Michael Jackson denied the sexual abuse charges leveled against him and won in court. Still, past the day of his death, Jackson was vilified by many despite being found not guilty. I loved 'The Pianist' as much as the next person, but Polanski admitted sexually assaulting this young girl and ran away before being sentenced. Polanski is not worthy of this support, and he shouldn't get away with it.


Comments: (89)
Add a comment
By: E on 9/30/2009 1:09PM
I happened to be home and I turned to the View right before they got on this topic. I could say that no only did I loose ALOT, actually, ALL respect that I have for Whoopi, but for everyone who is saying that this man did not rape a 10 year-old! Even if she consented, it's still rape! She was drugged and he had sex with her! Who can even put a finger to justify that!? AND, Whoopi is a HORRIBLE debater! Sherri couldn't get a word in! It was like watching a 5 year-old talk in a group of people! Whoopi, with 1 in 5 people haven been molested, I wouldn't side with what he did, no mateer how long ago it was, in eternity!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: WENDY on 10/01/2009 9:26AM
Where were these Hollywood pedophile defenders when R Kelly was going through the fire???? Don't get me wrong, I believe R Kelly was wrong for his sexual mis-deeds with a young girl, but so is pedophile Polanski. You can't condemn one and then defend the other.
Report This
By: roscoe on 10/01/2009 1:43PM
Supporting,a rich white person like Roman Polanski ;ooks good on the celebrity resume when it comes time for starring movie roles. Let Whoopi get in that same type of trouble around some little white kids, no matter how long it happened and see how much support she gets for her release.
Report This
By: KAREN on 10/05/2009 11:20AM
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH OBAMA? I'M CONFUSED. WHOOPI MADE THE COMMENT AND VOICED HER OPINION BUT WHAT IN THE WORLD DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH OBAMA? YOU GUYS ARE JUST AS IGINORANT HAS THE STATEMENT WHOOPPI MADE!!!!
Report This
By: E on 9/30/2009 1:09PM
If it was YOUR 10 year-old that he gave drugs to have sex with, what would you do?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: duh on 10/02/2009 1:50PM
Please people get over yourself, It was a long time ago and the girl herslef wants this to be done with and just go away...which tells me it might not have even happened..second the fact is that he reached a plea, which often happens in court cases, and in those pleas people sometimes plead guilty to things they might not have admitted to doing just for the sake of getting it over with...he probably just accepted the plea and understood that he wasnt goign to go to jail, then the judge went back on the agreement. Lots of people are molested its not a crutch, get over it and live your life...I did
Report This
By: DEVONECO on 10/07/2009 4:58PM
By: E on 9/30/2009
If it was YOUR 10 year-old that he gave drugs to have sex with, what would you do?
Polanski would be speaking as though he has inhaled helium gas, for the rest of his life. Get it?????
Report This
By: monique on 9/30/2009 1:12PM
You are 100% correct on this. Whoopi should be ashamed.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: sandy on 10/14/2009 5:49PM
Whoopi did not condone what Polanski did, she wanted to report the facts about his case correctly. That is her job to do to the best of her ability without she or anyone on the VIEW making random comments without being supported by actual facts. If you the VIEW this morning you would have seen that she addressed this because not only you but others thought she had been in favor of Polanski, just as some of these Alist celebrities.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: barbarascy385 on 10/01/2009 4:54PM
I saw the show and what she was trying to do is make sure that the proper information was given out. She wasn't condoning what he did; she just wanted to be sure that everybody was accurate on what Polanski was charged with. She read EXACTLY what the charges were, what charges were dropped, and what he plead to. As far as Hollywood supporting him in any way, I wouldn't. In my opinion if Polanski wasn't a rich Hollywood director he would have been sitting in jail for this crime. This situation has gone on for to long and it needs to be resolved. He needs to face the music and stop running like a little kid. And from what I have read the law might have wanted to ask this child's mother some questions, too. The whole situation is shady.
Report This