When I first heard about Spike Lee's attacks on Tyler Perry's films as being on-screen coonery, taking us back to the days of Amos and Andy, I applauded. I'd seen the ads for Meet the Browns and "House of Payne" and found myself headed straight for the toilet. How black people could be portrayed this way in the 21st century, I had no idea.
But I then realized that I'd made the very same mistake I often accuse others of making: I'd judged the book by its cover, and I'd been running my mouth about something I didn't fully understand. Spike Lee might be doing the same thing to Tyler Perry himself.
Not long after hearing Spike Lee's first critique of Tyler Perry, I went to see some Tyler Perry films. I also watched episodes of "House of Payne" and "Meet the Browns." I can't say that I enjoy the TV shows very much, but I loved the films. I also got a better understanding of Tyler Perry while watching his movies and plays. As much as I thought that Perry was using a man in a dress to sell tickets, the truth is that he was also using a man in a dress to sell his ideas. When one watches Tyler Perry movies, you find that the films are far less about Madea (the man in a dress), and far more about lessons in life, love and spirit that affect us all.
What is also true is that even if Perry were not idealistic enough to care about enhancing our spirits, the reality is that he has every right to put comedic characters in to his scripts. The problem for blacks in media has never been that we are being cast as buffoons; the issue is that these are the only roles we get. Black people can be funny, happy, sad, angry, thuggish, intellectual, ambitious and righteous. We are all of those things, but Hollywood doesn't get that (anybody see the "Ghetto girl" in "Couple's Retreat"?). So, for us to presume that the solution for Hollywood is to cast every black person as a Malcolm X or W.E.B. Dubois is both illogical and unrealistic. The objective is for us to have as many diverse images to choose from as the white man down the hall.
So to say that Tyler Perry is somehow responsible for undermining the images of African Americans in media is like saying that the MTV Show "Jack Ass" makes all white people look stupid. While one might notice the image of Madea in Perry's films (who actually is pretty funny), they can also notice the many black doctors, lawyers, pastors, and businesswomen as well. So, I say this to Spike Lee: I love you brother, you know I do. But in this case, I encourage you to do the right thing and broaden your perspective. Tyler Perry is not the enemy - Hollywood is.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is a Finance Professor at Syracuse University and founder of the Your Black World Coalition. To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 


Comments: (54)
Add a comment
By: LadyJNewYork on 10/27/2009 4:48PM
I agree with Spike Lee, nothing against Tyler Perry but his films should grow beyond the Madea's and Mr. Browns.
I like some of TP film's but after a while you get the same ole same ole...It would be nice if Tyler Perry took it to the next level with his movie instead of the same ole same ole, "not hate" just an observation....Nothing personal!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: wayne on 10/27/2009 4:51PM
Tyler Perry has given back to the community 100%.HE KEEPS MANY ACTORS IN HOLLYWOOD WITH A JOB,WHEN OTHERS CLOSED THE DOORS IN THEIR FACE.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Veda Johnson on 11/04/2009 7:20PM
Thank you for your comment because it is so true that if it hadn't been for Tyler Perry many of our black artist would be out of work. It's hard enough out there for black actors all competing for a few jobs. So thank you also Tyler Perry for opening up doors for them. God has bless Tyler with of gift that keeps on giving and he doesn't mind spreading his wealth around. Let's face it, because he has no problem in giving back, he can't help to be blessed. I really do love Spike Lee and I make it my business to go to his movies on the 1st weekend. Perhaps he too can learn a few things from Tyler when it comes to giving.
Report This
By: James Harris on 10/27/2009 5:00PM
My hat off to you Dr. Boyce, I concur. When I first heard what Spike lee was saying about Tyler Perry I was pissed. Spike Lee is supposed to be an intelligent man; well at least I thought he was. I’m sure there were people that said those things to Spike at some point in his career and for him to do it to another “brotha” instead of talking to him in private was wrong. Could it be that Mr. Lee is jealous?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Rob Tate on 11/02/2009 5:44PM
I seriously doubt that a director as storied as Spike Lee is "jealous" of another Black director. You don't think that he couldn't make the same type of films? He has a history of making films that go beyond what Hollywood has come to expect. In a way I agree with Spike, but I also realize that Perry always has a "lesson" learned, and the story is often inspirational. However, we are the only ones watching his films, not white people. All his films do nothing on an international level. All the white people see is the trailer which is 75% madea, so the images are still there and not the story that has the lesson. His demographic is church going individuals that are very familiar with his stage plays. At some point some kind of "difference" has to be made with his characters and the story.
Report This
By: Tameca on 11/06/2009 10:36AM
I fully agree w/you Mr. Harris! When I heard the comments made by Spike,my first thoughts were,oh, he's upset because he's not "on" right now. Everyone should have their time in the spotlight and Spike being the caliber of person that he is should support Tyler Perry rather than condemn him. Whether people want to accept it or not black people are very diverse and TP does an excellent job depicting this in his films.
Report This
By: Always Amazed... on 10/27/2009 5:34PM
Excellently written and adapatively expressed, Dr. Watkins.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: SunnyDAY on 11/03/2009 2:02PM
ditto
Report This
By: Arjai on 10/27/2009 5:52PM
Why? There is more than enough room for the both of them. Spike Lees' films can be viewed as "coonerey" just like he is saying Tyler Perrys' films are.
It is sad to see someone with experience (Spike) attack someone who is learning the buisness, and doing for himself, by himself and succeeding at it.
(Perry). It reminds me of the whole "crabs in a barrell" phrase.
I totally respect them both. Spike has come a long way since "she's gotta have it" and "school daze" both movies had their place and time. These movies have also opened doors for many african american actors who still have successful careers to this day. That is an accomplishment that Spike should be proud of. No one can deny that.
The same can be said for Tyler. You've got to respect a man that set out on his journey and refused to compromise (not that Spike did)_and did it for himself when others said no. I will be the first to say that I was kinda tired of Madea. Still, you would have to be blind to not see how his empire has grown. Why did I get married, The family that prays! They were far from coonerey.
It makes Spike look immature and envious to attack Tyler publicly. If he really cared, he could have contacted him privately. Who knows, the right approach could have resulted in a joint effort production....I would have payed to see it. However, this back and forth, media mud slinging only makes us all look bad.
There is room for us all.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Sonjam on 11/03/2009 2:05PM
Well put.
Report This