
I read with great sadness about the conviction of former Birmingham, Ala., Mayor Larry Langford, 63, who was found guilty of accepting $236,000 in cash and gifts in exchange for guiding contracts toward one of his friends, investment banker Bill Blount.
Langford's conviction conjures up a long list of mixed feelings. I can almost never fully believe anything that most politicians say. What's worse, I surely can't trust what politicians say about other politicians, as others are now using Langford as an example of how they've suddenly weeded out corruption.
Here are some quick thoughts on the trial of Larry Langford and what it means for politics in general, as well as his home city of Birmingham.
1) It's interesting how all comments about this case vary along party lines.
On one side, the Birmingham Democrats (Langford's party) have a tone of forgiveness for Langford and/or a sense of outrage at this "unjust" verdict. From the Republican side, there is nothing unjust about the verdict; rather, it is a "wake-up call" for politicians that this behavior is not going to be tolerated. The truth is that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are doing a good job for the people of Birmingham. Since 2000, 13 percent of the Birmingham population has moved away. Langford might be a convenient scapegoat for what ails the city, but the truth is that its problems are much deeper.
2) Do you really think that Langford is the only politician who has accepted a bribe?
The saddest thing about politics is that there is usually a very delicate power balance, one that can destroy your career if it is ever tipped out of your favor. It seems that nearly every politician is holding a political gun to the head of another, with each of them worried that his dirty laundry is going to get released before his opponent's. There are many politicians who cheat on their spouses, sleep with male lovers while fighting against gay rights, allow themselves to be bought out by industries that want to hurt the American people and even have people killed. So when a politician is convicted of a crime, I don't suddenly feel that the streets are safer. My interpretation is that the "bad guy" was probably on the losing end of a power struggle, and our minds are being manipulated to think that he or she is somehow worse than all of the other politicians who take care of their own interests ahead of their constituency.
3) Does exposure for corruption destroy a politician's legacy?
I had a friend whose father used to beat her as a child. The beatings were severe, and she suffers long-term psychological trauma from the experience. When you ask her and her siblings about their father, though, they say nothing but good things. Their philosophy is not that the beatings were okay, but that their father's mistakes do not overcome the good things he did. The same can be said about Langford, a politician who was loved by many for being a go-getter, rising out of the projects of Birmingham to take over the mayor's office. I am hopeful that those who evaluate Langford's legacy in the long-term will not focus solely on this incident. For the sake of full disclosure, I do not know anyone from Langford's family or political camp.
When it comes to Langford's trial and conviction, the bottom line is this: My philosophy on political corruption is similar to the opinions that many had during the Monica Lewinsky scandal: If a politician is being a little selfish on the side, I don't usually care as long as he is doing his job effectively. Call me cynical, but I don't trust politicians as far as I can throw them, and I believe that for every convicted politician, there are 10 others who did the same thing unscathed. At the same time, I sympathize with political figures (even the head honcho in the White House), because many of them, like kids in the hood, are simply products of a messy, dysfunctional environment.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is a professor at Syracuse University and author of the book 'Black American Money.' To have Dr. Boyce's commentary delivered to your e-mail, please click here. 

Comments: (13)
Add a comment
By: J Matt on 10/30/2009 11:58PM
Boyce, next time when reporting on events like this, try to just report the news.
The extra commentary felt so much like an editorial on a blog. The article's headline led me to think you were just reporting the facts and details on the case. Instead, I just got a lot of jibberish from some one whom doesn't live in my hometown (Birmingham). As a tag, you should have just put your name down there since it was 80% about what you thought. Ugh, is this what AOL pays you all to do? Just post and blog your thoughts? What a life.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Billy Springer on 10/31/2009 9:19PM
Politics is full of greedy people who crave power. Once they have the power, the money will come in one form or another. While those people are in office, they don't have to spend a dime of their own money. The Kennedy family are the only family who can't be bribed because; they already have money.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: HELORIS on 10/31/2009 8:39PM
they all do it he just got caught.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Ha ha on 11/01/2009 5:24AM
Poli-tricksters. Ha ha.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: AL Chick on 11/01/2009 5:37AM
As one of the Birmingham city "deserters", I feel that it is correct in the fact that the city's problems run deeper than the mayor.
He got caught and the two investors in my opinion did whatever they could to save their own hides. Langford is NOT innocent, but hardly a "hard criminal" to have to face so many years in prison.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: sugarbowl2009 on 11/01/2009 10:02PM
I BET YOU THIS WAS RACIALLY MOTIVATED.......................NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT!SEE WE GIVE THIS A$$ ( O ) THE KEY TO THE CITY SO THAT THE COLOR SCALE DON'T TIP AND "HE" BLOWS IT.....SO I GUESS WE BETTER CALL SO CALLED REV SHARPTON AND REV. JJ AND SEE HOW THEY CAN GET HIM OFF ON SOME KIND OF RACIST ACT......LMAOOOOOOOOOOOO
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lacam31 on 11/02/2009 6:23AM
You're saying as racial joke. But it is what it is. I'll bet you those two friends of his don't get no time.804 years.Why they don't just string him up?I'll bet you would even like that better.He should not have accepted the gifts but i be damn if he deserve that kind of time.And by the way race is always a factor when a black man is connected with two white men testifing aganist him after they set him up.YeH buddy we gonna play this race card.
Report This
By: kt on 11/02/2009 4:38PM
This is every mayor in america!!!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ROBBIE on 11/02/2009 5:48PM
I have been a supporter of Mr. Langford for many many years. His no non-sense stance against black on black crime and holding parents accountable for the actions of their kids is the main reasons why I have and "STILL DO" support him. I think he made a mistake by falling prey to Bill Blount's scheme to get richer, then when the stove got to hot he turned like the RAT he is on his friends. I think whatever jail time Langford gets, Blount,Lapiere should get the equal.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: William on 11/03/2009 11:58AM
Typical comment from black America. As long is the culprit is black they look the other way. He got caught stealing and to suggest it is all right because others do it just goes to show you. Marion Barry in D.C. was a disgusting crook yet the black voters still supported him. Black people have no credibility because of this attitude.
Reply to this Comment | Report This