Monique Ruffin: Moms Change the World: Kenya Stevens
Theodore Johnson: President Obama and the New Talented Tenth
Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, a 21-year-old Army cook, had no choice but to skip deployment to Afghanistan, even if it meant going to jail. The single mother of 10-month-old Kamani did not have anyone in place to care for her son.
Her mother, who was already emotionally and physically spent caring for three relatives, was incapable of caring for her grandson. Since Hutchinson had no other relatives or friends with whom she could leave her young son (the child's father is also out of the picture) she refused military orders to go overseas.
The Oakland, Calif., native was arrested by military police 10 days after she missed her unit's flight. To date, no charges have been filed, and Hutchinson remains confined to the Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah, Ga., where she may be facing up to a year in jail, pending an investigation.
In a statement released through her lawyer, Hutchinson said:
It is outrageous that they would deploy a single mother without a complete and current family care plan. I would like to find someone I trust who can take care of my son, but I cannot force my family to do this. They are dealing with their own health issues.
When the military mom was arrested on Nov. 6, Kamani was handed over to child welfare services, where he remained for nearly two days until Hutchinson's mother picked him up. According to Army records, Hutchinson joined the army in 2007 and has not been previously deployed overseas.
Army regulations dictate that all single-parent soldiers pre-plan their childcare accommodations for dependent children before they are deployed. According to published reports, in late October, Rai Sue Sussman, Hutchinson's attorney, said that the Army told her client that they would give her more time to find suitable arrangements for her child. Sussman added, "Then earlier this month, they told her she would not get the extended time after all and would have to deploy. The day before she was forced to deploy, they told her you have a choice to make, but your duty is to get on that plane," Sussman said.
In a release, Sussman stresses, "Hutchinson is not a conscientious objector seeking to avoid deployment." Kevin Larson, a spokesman for Hunter Army Airfield, states that Hutchinson's "deployment is halted" and that there will be no deployment while there is an investigation.
Comments: (46)
Add a comment
By: GE on 11/17/2009 5:31PM
Clearly, Paul does not get it. He sounds jaded as if he was abandoned by his mother at a early age. The reality is Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, a 21-year-old Army cook -is a MOTHER first and foremost.
Paul I just hope that if you have kids you find the help and love the your need to give to them...cause you've missed the point.
PEACE OUT
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: paul on 11/17/2009 5:57PM
to GE:
I saw the point. The first line of the article says that she had no choice but to go AWOL. Bull-Oney. I disagree with the premise of the point of the article - that she had no choice in the matter because motherhood was thrust upon her. To that I say "Where is her husband?"
A mother first and foremost?? She was in the Army first, (the article says she joined in 2007) and now she's looking at giving up her kid while she goes to jail for her actions. That means she decided to start a family with a guy who is "not in the picture" knowing full well that we were at war and there was a very good chance that she would be deployed. Some mom.
The only victim here is the kid, and the only bad guy is the mom.
In her statement she says "It is outrageous that they would deploy a single mother without a complete and current family care plan." I agree with her 100% - it is outrageous that she did not have a plan for her child knowing full well that she was going to be deployed.
I have 2 young kids and my wife is a stay-home mom. She has the most important job in the world. My job is only to support her and the kids. If she were an army cook that got deployed I would be here with our kids, she would be over there doing her duty, and we wouldn't be in the news for going AWOL and dodging our obligations to the military.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: fathaz_luv on 11/17/2009 7:06PM
This young lady is the prime example on why the military doesn't let single parents join active duty. On a daily basis I have young ladies with children who has a legitimate person to care for their child(ren) just in case they are deployed but can't because of situations like this. The consequences of this young ladies actions will affect others in the future. The rule is pretty clear. If you have a child before enlistment and you are a single parent then you are disqualified for enlistment into the active (fulltime) service. Some ladies like the above soldier have children while on active duty which is fine. They are required to have a person in place to care for her child in case they are deployed. This is called a family care plan which is actually signed by her commanding officer and the person listed as the legal guardian. The guardianship papers has to be notorized before it is accepted by the military. If the soldier doesn't have a valid family care plan, they will be discharged from the military.
Bottom line, some soldiers use this as a reason not to deploy. She can't do anything for her son now in jail. Now the mother of the soldier steps forward and gets the child but the damage has been done now. This is a serious issue and before others comment on it they need to now the rules.
Some think just because they are serving their time stationed at their place of duty they are doing their job. They are actually training at their duty station until called upon to perform their job.
If your child wanted to join the military but was told by a recruiter she can't because she is a single parent, what would you say? You would say, "Why can't she join as a single parent." This is why! The military can pay your bills, provide medical and life insurance, and send you to college but when the military need you to perform the job you try and skip out on it. You should be made to pay every single dime back. The money it cost to train you also which is easily $30,000 and up per person depending on your job specialty.
I am a father of two and married to a beautiful woman. If faced with the same situation, I would have handled it differently. If this young lady is discharged she will once again try and rejoin the military. I see this all the time.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: dre smith on 11/18/2009 7:27AM
Well written and definetaly on point.
Ditto!
Report This
By: RUSerious on 11/18/2009 7:53PM
I agree! Very good points! Apparently "AF" didn't get it....research, educate, comprehend and TRY AGAIN AF!
Report This
By: BG on 11/17/2009 7:20PM
As simple as that Paul. First my prayers and support goes to other men and women who had left their children with other folks to take on the war for their country. It offends the concience of mankind to see the soldier's mom operating a daycare, taking care of other people's children, and cannot take care of her grandchild. If this lady were to go to the nightclub all week long, she would have somebody to babysit for her. This is not a race issue and it is a shame to coat it that way. She belong in jail.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: AF on 11/18/2009 4:25PM
I agree with GE.Paul and Fatha..why have you not stepped up to help this mom out, offered to take care of her son.Paul, the Army sees no colors. The black voice is her heritage. Your the one that sees colors. And Fatha do you have relatives serving in the Armed Forces? How would you know " You see it all the time" I have family in the Army and I don't see it all the time. We are not her and WE cannot speak for her. She is an Army mother, first and foremost. She is protection her son, as she would be protecting yours, should she be deployed. Instead of complaining why don't you stand up and try to help her.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: fathaz_luv on 11/20/2009 10:22AM
Why are people so ignorant to the facts? I am currently in the Army (15 total yrs) and have been deployed also. This soldier had at least 6 months to prepare for this deployment. I have two children: 7 months and 11. Obviously you do know anything about the military. And by the way I have several family members who is in the military. I just got off recruiting duty (two years) a couple months ago. Female soldiers have the opportunity to be released for pregnancy if they see fit to care for their children. She decided to stay in and continue getting paid and receiving the benefits. Some came in the recruiting station saying the reason why they got out. Males and females would be on orders to deploy but they used the same excuse to get out of the deployment but in about six months they are trying to come back into the military. This isn't somewhere you can go for a free check.
The mom runs a daycare. The military will help pay for daily care.(vouchers). Not to mention the Army was paying her a basic housing allowance (about a $1000) and BAS(food allowance) plus her monthy pay for her rank she held. Why couldn't see pay her mom to watch her child. If the mother only can take care of children who is paying her money then there she go. The child wouldn't just be her grandchild she would also be her client. The very person who said she couldn't take care of the kid now has the child.
The military isn't just a job to get paid. When it's time to deploy some people come out the woodworks with excuses on why they can't go. If this soldier get out of this deployment then there would be a mess that none of you have to deal with. Keep sitting on your couch eating and getting fat while all the soldiers risk their lives and make sacrifices so you can do the things you are doing today. A lot of people say they are apreciative but in all actually they are not. (This doesn't apply to everyone). People have died to form this country or have we forgotten about that. Part of my job while serving on recruiting duty is to contact High school students for possible enlistment. Parents curse you, kids don't want to talk to you. Everyone wants to go to college but who is going to protect this country to give us these luxuries. Me!!!!! People would sacrific someone elses child but want to protect their own. And the very parents who wouldn't let their child join are bringing their kids to us when they get into some trouble. We don't want those bad apples to have to deal with.
This is more than this soldier! Where is the patriotism? All that say she is a mother first, you take her place and deploy!
Report This
By: todd on 12/12/2009 7:37PM
Well the answer is simple, she needs to get the hell out of the Army and she should not be allow to ever come back into any branch of the military. Because this means that some other military family has to suffer for her short falls. (i.e. some one who just got off deployment has to go back on deployment). This welfare case is a shame. all she had to do is tell her command that she needed a hardship discharge due to her being a single parent. but she did not because she wants a pay check. In the military this is common place practice, you have females that can not make height and weight requirements; so they get pregnant and do not deploy and get another 6 months to get back in shape but before that time is up they are pregnant once more and the cycle never stops. Also, I understand something’s are a must in dealing with a pregnancy but at some point you must meet all the minimum requirements like all other service member in order to call your self a service member. I would feel less than equal if I took advantage of a system in this way. If she worked at BK and could not make to work she would be fired, I bet you she has not told you how many training evolutions, she has missed, how many times she has been late to work because of inadequate child care, and how much time she was given to get an adequate child care.
Report This
By: Jacquie on 11/17/2009 8:33PM
Apparently, the father isn't doing his duty. You know the army is male-controlled, right? So, the government can't make the fathers do their duty parentally, financially or otherwise . . . but, they want the mother to fulfill her duty ( I mean, be SUPERwoman). Of course, let the woman do it all.
Reply to this Comment | Report This