Oh, the cats have their claws out for Desirée Rogers! The stylish White House social secretary is on the hot seat for the lapse in security that allowed Michaele and Tareq Salahi to crash last week's White House state dinner for Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh and his wife, Gursharan Kaur.
The Secret Service has taken the blame for the lapse (as they should). Still, the fact that no one from Rogers' staff was on hand to check guests against the official list, as had been the custom for previous presidential administrations, has led to speculation that she spent too much time that evening basking in the spotlight rather than taking care of business.
Meanwhile, Rogers has declined to testify today before a House Homeland Security Committee on the incident, reports the Associated Press.
Rogers made her entrance to the dinner in an attention-grabbing Comme des Garcons pale peach gown and did not stay in the background during the elegant event that she had organized, relates Washington Post reporter Robin Givhan. "Just because she has this job, it's not going to make her a worker bee," explained an unidentified friend, according to Givhan. "She's glamorous."
Givhan continued:
Although the state dinner was Rogers's responsibility, with its myriad moving parts, she was on the official guest list, along with other Obama intimates from Chicago, such as her ex-husband John Rogers, Marty Nesbitt and his wife, Anita Blanchard. Instead of remaining behind the scenes, like a discreet stage director, Desirée Rogers had a seat at the most exclusive dinner in town. She was not the first social secretary to be seated at a state dinner, although others typically pulled up a chair only after they'd mastered the role. SOURCE: Washington Post
That description was an echo of yesterday's diva portrayal by New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd:
The statuesque social secretary brandishing a Harvard M.B.A. and animal-print designer shoes is not any mere party planner. The old friend of the first couple from Chicago has the exalted and uncommon title of social secretary and special assistant to the president.
Instead of standing outside with a clipboard, eyeballing guests as Anne Hathaway did in "The Devil Wears Prada," Desirée was a guest at the dinner, the center of her own table of guests, just like the president and first lady.
As Michael Isikoff wrote in Newsweek, Rogers sidelined Cathy Hargraves, the East Wing staffer whose job it was to go to the East Gate portico and check off the names of each guest from a printout.
Rogers told Hargraves that the Obama team felt no need for those services because, given the recession, there wouldn't be many lavish dinners. But even if it's just two state dinners a year, as the first lady plans, one big mistake is too many. SOURCE: New York Times
Yes, the Washington wags might swipe at Rogers, but for now, the White House is standing behind her. Today White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs cited separation of powers and a history of White House staff not testifying before Congress as the reasons she will not go before the congressional committee.
______________
Sheryl Huggins Salomon is contributing editor of Black Voices, where she writes about politics and society. She is co-editor of the 'Nia Guide for Black Women' series of self-improvement books and the former publisher of Shade magazine. Follow her on Twitter or contact her at BVCEditor@aol.com.



Comments: (14)
Add a comment
By: Jewel on 12/09/2009 11:55PM
As much as I hate to say it, someone from Ms. Rogers' office should have been present in addition to the Secret Service. As a planner, I
know that is standard protocol. For high profile functions where security is needed, a person or persons from the planning team is also present at some point to catch uninvited guests from slipping
through or to readily vouch for names that were left off of the guest list. I know Ms. Rogers said she was available to answer any questions regarding any of the guests, but that was good enough. Even so, I don't think Ms. Rogers is a a diva, a disgrace, or should be fired. Surely, this type of thing will not happen again.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jewel on 12/10/2009 12:03AM
Correction - I know Ms. Rogers said she was available to answer any questions regarding any of the guests, but that was not good enough.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Michael Lofton on 12/26/2009 12:07PM
....and "big up" for Fox News for disclosing this because the liberal media would have shined this on.....
......because Desiree Rogers, the Obama Administration, or even President Obama, would have allowed the ax and all the responsibility to fall on the "Secret Service", the "Secret Service" not at fault at all....
......which would have resulted in one or more Secret Service members being fired, criminally prosecuted, etc., etc.
....and speaking of being ethical.....
http://www.bvblackspin.com/2009/11/05/black-congresspeople-being-black-listed/23#commentsInline
"Are Black Congresspeople Being Blacklisted?" by Madison Gray, Black Voices/Black Spin
......and the members of the Democratic Congressional Black Caucus who fit the description should not only be blacklisted, but also recalled or removed from a position of influence as an elected official.....
.....because far too often these individuals are:
1. Sleazy, incompetent, criminal, unethical and treasonous.
2. Fail or have no duty to uphold his or her mandated sworn oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and/or respective State Constitutions.
3. A Disgrace to the essence of what it means to be and elected official.
4. Any combination of 1, 2, and/or 3.
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-352814
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-182700
....Thank You Dr. Boyce Watkins for staying on point.
.....Unlike what you are seeing on "Black Voices", outside of the confines of the internet, meaning those in the trenches who have faced the music.......
....and/or those who have been a witness to other law abiding Black people egregiously violated by the atrocities of government, know differently.....
.......all while President Barack Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and/or other misfit elected Black leaders, lawyers, etc., remain silent, or condemn and blanket the inner-city Black men, male, as being irresponsible, dead beat, you name it.....
....without a thread of evidence to prove that this is so!!!!
......and furthermore these individuals know, that more so than the rank and file in the Black community......
........it is our own elected Black leadership, and/or a misguided Black middleclass, who are......
.....blatant liars, irresponsible, dead beat, hypocrites, treasonous, unfit for elected office, sleazy, cut-throat, pimping the Black community for their own self efficacy, you name it.
.........Finally, there are many law abiding U.S. born Black people who do not have praise for President Barack Obama, and/or many other misfit elected Black leaders affiliated with the Democratic Party, political party responsible for the vestible of Slavery in the U.S., whose un-American and disgraceful actions keep the Democratic Party's buried Past Alive!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Michael Lofton on 12/26/2009 6:36PM
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/doug-heye/2009/12/04/secret-service-shouldnt-take-blame-for-white-house-crasher-scandal.html
"Secret Service Shouldn't Take Blame for White House Crasher Scandal"
"Tactless social climbing aside, that a couple could get that close to the President and Vice President—without an invitation—is troubling. What has the White House's reaction been? To stonewall, protect their own people, find the nearest bus and throw the United States Secret Service under it.
Despite Obama's repeated claims of transparency, the White House is not allowing their own personnel to testify at a hearing of the House Homeland Security Committee (Tiger Woods has been more forthcoming than the Obama White House), instead throwing Mark Sullivan, head of the Secret Service, to the wolves of Congress—not to mention the cameras.
Following the hearing, on the same day Obama held a "jobs summit," three employees of the Secret Service's uniformed officer division have been put on administrative leave. It is widely expected that the public servants will be fired."
The Secret Service did their job. They ensured they everyone was safe to enter and that the President and Vice President were not put at risk. The Secret Service is not there to be glorified bouncers, making a list of attendees and checking it twice. That's the job of the host organization—in this case, the White House."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwqBm-puhCc
Tareq and Michaele Salahi: We Were Invited to White House, We Weren't Party Crashers
Reply to this Comment | Report This