Following the criticism it received for including the term "Negro" on 2010 forms, the Census Bureau is considering dropping the word from its surveysAccording to Richard Prince's Journal-isms:
"A test embedded in the 2010 census will measure the effect of removing the term 'Negro' on reports about a person's racial identity." "The results will be used to inform design changes for future surveys and the 2020 Census. In the 2000 census, more than 50,000 persons chose to write down explicitly that they identified themselves as 'Negro'," the announcement continued.
Some people felt that the term was offensive. The Census Bureau argued that more than 56,000 people self-identified themselves as Negro during the last census by writing the term in. In addition, the word was included alongside African American and black on the same question, not as a separate entry. The Census Bureau says that similar research was not done during the 2000 census and that "such research is important to avoid unanticipated consequences of changing question wording on the outcome of a census."
The word itself is not offensive, just outdated. The Census Bureau should be applauded for trying to be as inclusive as possible, given that census data helps determine everything from school, road and hospital funding to congressional districts.
Racial identification in this country has always been tricky. Some people look at your skin color and automatically decide what race you are. The one-drop rule is alive and well, but individuals see things differently.
It's not like there is universal agreement over the terms "black" or "African American." Some people feel that "black" is not a realistic description of their actual color. Others say they don't feel connected enough to Africa to be called African Americans.
I wouldn't be surprised if in my lifetime another term arises to replace both.
As I said in an earlier piece, the Census Bureau should take steps to make sure younger blacks who may be offended by the term are not turned off so much that they refuse to fill out the questionnaire.
If the Census Bureau's tests reveal that fewer blacks took part in being counted because the word Negro was not on the questionnaire, then maybe it should stay on the form. I'm more concerned about properly funded schools.
And, like it or not, there are still people from earlier generations who refer to themselves as Negro.


Comments: (33)
Add a comment
By: allourbase on 1/28/2010 4:38PM
Our society will never change at this rate. The best solution is anyone taking a census to not mark a race. Eventually they wont include race and the issue will be left where it needs to be in the past. It is just a classification to target you and sell something. Think about really who cares what color you are! Race issues will not stop till we stop identifying ourselves by it. How about identifying what type of person you are and your interests, goals, and ambitions. Be proud of your heritage, but its not what defines you.
Anyway the black/white slave argument...go to goree island off the coast of Senegal, Africa. You will find both hands are dirty...American slavery well a bit different people are sick and made it into a status issue.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Tyrone Galtney on 3/06/2010 1:02AM
The divide and conquer game has been going on since Slavery. Negroe was a misapplication to Africans who were forced to be called such but Carter G. Woodson made a point when he said the Euro-Devils who run this country behind closed doors and are Klu Klux Klans, NAZI's, and Zionist. They all asked "What Must We Do With The Negroe?" and now Rahm Emmanuel Obama's Backstabber in The White House and Pro Israel Secret Spy has conspired to dilute the power of "Black" people in this country by bringing up an old term in question. By Calling me Negroe I wonder how would they feel if someone called them "Hymie" we get a Black President and the Black People get much more lesser respect. I wonder what do Rahm Emmanuel and his friends call the president when his back is turned. Those Backstabbers are now trying to undercount us once again starting chiefly with the Gate Keeper to The White House "Rahmbo".
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mara on 4/11/2010 9:55PM
Recently, I found the 2010 Census form hanging on my door. As I began filling it out, I came across a dilemma. The U.S. government wants to know if my children are adopted or not and it wants to know what our races are. Being adopted myself, I had to put “Other” and “Don’t Know Adopted” for my race and “Other” and “Don’t Know” for my kids’ races.
Can you imagine not knowing your ethnicity, your race? Now imagine walking into a vital records office and asking the clerk for your original birth certificate only to be told “No, you can’t have it, it’s sealed.”
How about being presented with a “family history form” to fill out at every single doctor’s office visit and having to put “N/A Adopted” where life saving information should be?
Imagine being asked what your nationality is and having to respond with “I don’t know”.
It is time that the archaic practice of sealing and altering birth certificates of adopted persons stops.
Adoption is a 5 billion dollar, unregulated industry that profits from the sale and redistribution of children. It turns children into chattel who are re-labeled and sold as “blank slates”.
Genealogy, a modern-day fascination, cannot be enjoyed by adopted persons with sealed identities. Family trees are exclusive to the non-adopted persons in our society.
If adoption is truly to return to what is best for a child, then the rights of children to their biological identities should NEVER be violated. Every single judge that finalizes an adoption and orders a child’s birth certificate to be sealed should be ashamed of him/herself.
I challenge all readers: Ask the adopted persons that you know if their original birth certificates are sealed.
Reply to this Comment | Report This