I'm not sure why President Barack Obama and the Democrats are acting like the sky has fallen and that the health care bill is dead after Martha Coakley lost the Massachusetts Senate race to Republican Scott Brown.Democrats, despite losing their filibuster-proof 60 vote super majority, have enough options open to them to pass the bill without, as some commentators have speculated, alienating the general public.
According to the New York Times:
House leaders signaled that they had effectively ruled out the idea of adopting the Senate bill, which would send it directly to the president for his signature. Yet close advisers to the president said such a move was still on the table. Mr. Brown's victory in Massachusetts on Tuesday denies Democrats the 60th vote that they need to surmount filibusters and advance a revised health measure. Senate leaders said they would not risk antagonizing voters by trying to rush a bill through before Mr. Brown could be sworn in, and Mr. Obama agreed. "People in Massachusetts spoke," the president told ABC. "He's got to be part of that process."
Brown can still be a part of the process after the Senate bill is adopted by the House. Paul Waldman of The American Prospect writes:
Obama would sign it, and the infrastructure of reform would be in place. Then they could attempt to correct some of the Senate bill's weaknesses in the reconciliation process, which only requires 51 votes (though it does limit which parts of the bill can be addressed).
These days, some Republicans seem more interested in planning for the midterm and presidential election as opposed to enacting desperately needed health care reform. Other Western countries can't believe that we don't have a system in place already. People who go to work every day are without proper coverage and health care costs are hurting the economy by dragging some businesses under.
Seven presidents have tried to adopt health care reform. This may be the last best chance for another generation.Can you imagine what this country would look like if politicians had buckled and not passed Medicare or social security? Our country is a better place for the elderly because of those two programs, even though they, like health care reform, are far from perfect.
As Kevin Drum of Mother Jones points out, the attitude of Democrats is similar to the 2000 recount. Instead of fighting for a full recount effort and being eager to at least examine the public's concerns, Democrats were more concerned with maintaining a sense of decorum and a façade for the world. I'm not sure Republicans would have taken the same tact had the shoe been on the other foot.
Drum writes:It's time for House liberals, labor unions, lefty activists, Blue Dogs, Democratic pro-lifers, and fence-sitting centrists to all face reality: The only way to pass healthcare reform of any kind is for the House to pass the Senate bill and then work to improve it later during the budget reconciliation process, which requires only 51 votes in the Senate. That's it. That's the choice.
Although Massachusetts voters may have had health care on their minds in voting for Brown, what role did local issues, such as property taxes, play in the vote? How about Coakley's reported lackadaisical campaigning and her failure to get her message directly to the voters? Did she effectively articulate to voters why she's in favor of the health care bill?
As Waldman points out using a crude numbers game: If Brown wins, Democratic senators supporting reform will represent 193 million Americans (63 percent), while Republicans opposing reform will represent 113 million (37 percent). It would be hard to argue that that small change means Democrats no longer have a right to enact their agenda.
If Democrats back down, they lose anyway. You can feel Republicans trying to use this momentum to knock down a raft of issues that deserve examination and change in this country, such as regulating the financial markets, our energy consumption and global warming.
African Americans voted for progressive change. As consistent supporters of the Democratic Party, we should demand that Democrats stop over thinking the issue and push forward with health care reform.


Comments: (42)
Add a comment
By: Bill Schrier on 1/22/2010 5:35PM
"Can you imagine what this country would look like if politicians had buckled and not passed Medicare or social security."
Yes I can. Without the socialist Medicare and Social Security programs, workers in this country wouldn't have a huge payroll tax and Medicare tax burden all their lives, most of which doesn't even go to those programs but to government bureacratic "workers". All those saved taxes the workers who earned it could easily make a good 10% a year on in private sector investments.
In addition, payroll taxes have to be matched by the employer. This means employers have a dis-incentive to hire new workers, or at least full time new workers (the good jobs), meaning this socialism is also a job killer, except for useless government bureaucrat jobs.
The money paid in by the productive mostly goes to the lazy, those who paid in little or nothing to these programs get the most benefits but pay the least (remind you of someone you know?). That's why you Negroes love those entitlement programs ... they re-distribute wealth from those who earn it to you.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Debbie on 1/22/2010 8:05PM
Bill you are truly a total jerk. That is why you krackers are the largest ethnic group on welfare, social security and every other entitlement program, and always have been since there inception. Tell your myths to someone who doesn't know any better. I would love for them to go away then we would see just how many of you could survive. We survived slavery, Jim crow, depression, and discrimination and still are doing better than you in many situation with no help. Kiss my Black ***!
Report This
By: faros123 on 1/22/2010 8:05PM
Bill Schrier:
You and your kind are so ignorant. It was Eisenhower's "socialist" highway program that made suburban life possible. There's a long list of "sociaist" programs that Whites have benefitted from,ie, F.H.A., Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Pell Grants--just to name a few.
Concerning your statement that "Negroes love those entitlement programs, I would like for you to respond to this question. Who are the main recipients of "entitlement" programs in Utah, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota,Vermont, Rhode Island, Maine. Can you see where I'm going with this. By the way, Just about every American of African descent that I know, works. How many do you personally know that doesn't.
I have another question for you. Are you familiar with the Homestead Act of the 1800's? Talk about redistribution!!! You people are so funny.
Report This
By: Bill Schrier on 1/22/2010 8:23PM
Yes, the absolute number of whites on welfare is higher, but the RATE of welfare among blacks is quadruple that of whites. Does the term "per capita" mean anything to you?
When you add in the blacks in prison, or living off illegal means (gangs, selling drugs), together with the high rate of blacks who work for the government, you have a far higher dependency RATE of blacks on government than is the case of whites. Yes, the numbers are high for whites because they outnumber blacks by many times, but it's RATE that matters.
Report This
By: d on 1/23/2010 4:23AM
That's why you Negroes love those entitlement programs ... they re-distribute wealth from those who earn it to you.
--well since our ancestors worked for free for over 250 years, then I guess we are getting some of their long overdue paychecks. I think you call it inheritance.
Report This
By: Bill Schrier on 1/22/2010 6:40PM
"African Americans voted for progressive change. As consistent supporters of the Democratic Party, we should demand that Democrats stop over thinking the issue and push forward with health care reform."
It's precisely because Negroes are reliable Democratic voters that you can't demand anything of the Democrats. The party takes your vote for granted, and all evidence points to that being a safe assumption on their part.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Debbie on 1/22/2010 8:06PM
Then what happened to all you wealth with twenty out of twenty-eight years of Republican rule? They screwed you royally. Don't blame the Democrats for that. Take your head out of your A** and maybe you could effect some change in this country. I hate stupid people!
Report This
By: Bill Schrier on 1/22/2010 8:26PM
Who said I was a Republican? I'm a Libertarian or Constitutionalist. If I find a Republican who is a Libertarian or close, I vote for them. Otherwise, I vote straight Libertarian.
Report This
By: Michael Lofton on 1/23/2010 2:29PM
"You stupid ignorant Redneck hiding under a white sheet cause you are a coward. What are you doing reading Black Voice anyway. At the end of the day, we will see who have the last word. Tell me something what color do you think you'll be when you're DEAD?" by SoulSister
SoulSister and/or anyone else who lack factual basis for his or her comments
.....is that the best you can do to defend and honor your idol, President Barack "the Magic Negro" Obama?
Furthermore there are many other U.S. born Black men, women like me, who have an entirely different assessment of President Obama and/or the Obama Administration. We are not all misinformed and gullible!
The people have spoken, and by and large are not interested in ObamaCrat Health Care!
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-316033
This is yet another good reason why it is so important that our own elected Black leaders, the so-called Black affluent, or others in our community, step up to the plate to truly serve the best interests of law abiding Black people who have legitimate claims for redress......
....so that money earned through legitima
te court settlements can be used to create privately financed work opportunity so that Black people who are U.S. citizens by birthright can:
1. Pay for the health care plan of his, her, or their choice.
2. Own rental property as opposed to being the predominate renter or being on a public financed "section 8" rental subsidy.
3. Afford to send any sibling to private school, etc.
4. Be better equipped to control their own destiny.
5. Keep over intrusion of government out of the their lives.
6. Send that treasonous Black middleclass "packing", in no good President Barack Obama being one of the treasonous, and/or any outsiders whose influence conspires with the treasonous Black middleclass in no good "Black Code" law enforcement or other un-American, truly unethical, and illegal practices.
7. Achieve the American Dream and compete on any level, with anyone, be it Caucasian, Korean, Hispanic, Affluent, etc., etc., etc.
8. Etc.
.....The typical contemporary elected Black leaders, and/or the typical no good Black middleclass are against this.
By and large many of these individuals have derived their income by using the Black underclass in assorted no good government financed welfare, AFDC, Mental Health (Bull Crap), presenting or publishing falsehoods, conspiring with the perpetrators to further deny law abiding U.S. born Black people redress, promoting penal incarceration, fining, probation for and/or punishment of the innocent, breaking up law abiding Black families for ill-gained profit, etc., which has made Black people "fodder for the system
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Bill Schrier on 1/22/2010 7:48PM
Wow, you sound like the rare black person who actually gets it. That Democratic socialism is not about helping anybody other than Democratic politicians exercise power and accrue wealth and decision-making power unto themselves, taking freedom from the people. Most blacks can't see that the break-up of their family structure coincided with the massive Democratic social welfare programs of the 1960's, so that the traditional family structure of a father and a mother was replaced by a government social worker and a mother.
Report This