Neutral

PRESIDENT OBAMA MADE IT CLEAR THAT HE IS TIRED OF THE MEDIA POUNCING ON SOUND BITES AND BASICALLY B.S. FROM THE RIGHT...AND SO AM I AS WELL AS OTHERS.

QUIT POSTING THIS CRAP BY THOSE RACIST EVIL HATEFUL RETARD TEA BAGGERS. THEY WANT AMERICA TO FAIL THEY BELONG TO THE PARTY OF "NO". SO STOP POSTING THEIR HATEFUL MESSAGES.

I VOTED FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA TO CHANGE IF NOT ALL AT LEAST SOME OF THE WRONGS THAT TOOK PLACE DURING THE BUSH ADMINSTRATION. THIS IS 2010, THIS IS PRESIDENT OBAMA'S SECOND TERM. LET'S NOT WASTE IT ON EVIL HATEFUL SICK MINDED TEA BAGGERS.

THEY WANT TO SAY PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A PIMP AND I SAY THE TEA BAGGERS ARE BLUE EYE DEVILS SO THERE WHAT ABOUT IT.

LET'S MOVE ON AND STOP WITH THIS STUPID SH-T!

 Report This

Low Ranked

THIS IS PRESIDENT OBAMA'S SECOND TERM. LET'S NOT WASTE IT ON EVIL HATEFUL SICK MINDED TEA BAGGERS.

THEY WANT TO SAY PRESIDENT OBAMA IS A PIMP AND I SAY THE TEA BAGGERS ARE BLUE EYE DEVILS SO THERE WHAT ABOUT IT.

LET'S MOVE ON AND STOP WITH THIS STUPID SH-T!

 Report This

Neutral

To Mimi, whose using sound bites now?? You need to think for yourself.

 Report This

Low Ranked

Of course, every previous president has been lampooned. But although it's perfectly okay to lampoon white presidents, you never never can do it to a Negro ... that would be racist. This is just more of the same old double standard, whites have to walk on eggshells in how they portray or talk about Negroes, but Negroes are free to portray or talk about whites in the worst ways.

 Report This

Low Ranked

Here's another example of the double standard:

No longer can whites put on blackface and do minstrel shows.

BUT blacks can put on white makeup and do a mockery of whites ... remember the Wayan's brother's 2004 movie White Chicks? How is this Negro movie making fun of whites any different than the following 1942 clip, which is now considered to racist to be included whenever the full movie is aired:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAHSTbD4A5M&feature=player_embedded

 Report This

Neutral

Once again you're bastardizing the facts and trivializing the point, which was clearly made. (A commonly known practice of your ILK).

What's missing here is the underlying connotations that you two are deliberately over looking, as you reach for excuses to pacify yourselves on the matter.
(Seeking an exit)

Whites, known historically as the oppressors, has positioned and programmed the people at large in such a way as to have their negative mockeries laughed off, more so, than those same but relative mockeries of blacks, which is likely and often more damaging.
Blacks are more likely haunted by negative propagandas than whites would be and therein lies the fundamental differences on the matter which those of your ILK has long since orchestrated, not the blacks.
(Feel free to Read/Review your own damn history books!)

Also, Whites "Black Facing" themselves had many underlying reasons for doing it, but more often because it was better received as slap-stick entertainment for the stage act than to have a REAL black person playing the part in an audience packed with psychotically racist trigger-happy whites. Go figure!
(Read/Review your own damn history books!)

And if the wayans brothers had made that exact same film/movie (you’ve referenced) back when whites were doing all the frequent but yet to be prosecuted drive by shootings and a host of other insanely criminal acts they were not found guilty for, the wayans would have long since been lynched and I KNOW YOU ALREADY KNOW THIS, yet you proceed under equal comparison, which self testifies what you folks made of.

And about Jesus getting the same treatment? Well the difference is, HE rose from the dead on the 3rd day, but everyone else are still in their graves.

 Report This