
While trumpets were blaring and Mardi Gras beads were being tossed after the Saints' monumental Super Bowl victory, revelers were asking "who dat?" But urban politics had already given its latest answer.
Earlier this month, voters in the Big Easy chose Mitch Landrieu as mayor, making him the first white mayor of the city since his father held the office more than 30 years prior. But the election signifies something very different: a change in the voting tastes in cities with large black populations.
Since the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., majority African American constituencies have been increasingly creating voting blocs that almost exclusively send black candidates to public offices, city councils, state legislatures and even the U.S. House of Representatives. And when they didn't send a brother or sister to the House, the rep needed to at least connote his love of barbecue and Ray Charles' music.
But since the notable 95 percent black backing of President Barack Obama in densely black areas, people who would have never gotten a black vote a generation ago have been winning elections or at least coming very close.
The first clue was in New Orleans in 2008, when moderate Republican Joseph Cao, a Vietnamese American, defeated nine-term Democrat William Jefferson, who was eventually imprisoned on corruption charges. Louisiana's 2nd Congressional District is an area that Jefferson had on lock for years. Any challenge to him made almost no sense.
But skepticism about Jefferson's effectiveness, the corruption charges and Hurricane Katrina changed the voting demographic there, leaving the stream wide open for Cao to take the seat.
The next year, in Atlanta, one of the most heated mayoral races in years nearly put city councilwoman Mary Norwood in City Hall. She received 46 percent of the vote, more than any other candidate, but the rules there state that if nobody gets more than 50 percent of the vote, a runoff must take place, which happened on Dec. 1, which resulted in her opponent, Kasim Reed, taking office.
What is striking is that Atlanta is 56 percent black, perhaps enough to have easily given Reed the win, but black voters there did not give him strong support. It should also be noted that Atlanta has lost as much as 15 percent of its black population since the mid-1970s.
Chicago is probably the most noticeable city with a significant black population with a white mayor (Richard M. Daley). He defeated Eugene Sawyer, who replaced Harold M. Washington in 1989. Blacks are clearly keeping Daley in office as much as whites are.
But back in New Orleans, Landrieu's election possibly represents less of a demographic shift and more a change in what African Americans will vote for. The '70s and '80s represented a time when blacks sought black faces to represent them in government. Perhaps now, they are seeking the strongest representation, looking for more bang for their buck.
If black Americans do not feel beholden to vote for a municipal or legislative candidate just because he or she is black, then it won't be long before any particular party will have to stop taking our votes for granted. Maybe that's a good thing, maybe that's what post-racial really means.


Comments: (8)
Add a comment
By: kingpen81 on 2/16/2010 2:26PM
I understand the point of the article however I am reluctant to jump to the same conclusion. I think the election of President Obama has created a false sense of progress in this country. No doubt progress has been made however we are far from post racial. Lets remember two things: 1) 95% of Blacks and close to 65% of young people (18-25) voted for Obama 2) the politics in this country is dominated by incumbents which are overwhelmingly white males 45 and over. The reality is that this group of politicians did not vote for the president nor are they post racial; in fact many simply tolerate us and don't champion are causes. Which further supports the need for Black voting blocs, so that our voices are heard, more importantly are needs are addressed. Don't get me wrong Black politicians doesn't necessarily go hard for us either but the chances are much greater.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: marylandman003 on 2/16/2010 3:19PM
racist are the worlds true racists.
over 90% of the time negroes vote negro,instead of who's better for the job.
any wonder why cities with negro democrat mayors are falling apart due to negro crime and violence??
Baltimore. DC. Newark NJ. Cleveland. Detroit Chicago,the list goes on and on and on!!
maybe negroes cant and shouldnt govern them selves
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: kingpen81 on 2/16/2010 10:41PM
you can't be serious .... let's be clear white folk don't know who they are voting for half the time as well, don't act like its only black folk. furthermore all of the those cities have serious epidemics of poverty and underdevelopment. these two things can't be ignored. poverty has the tremendous impact of crippling towns and cities. Those cities are only the focus because large populations of black fold live there....there are thousands of poor white areas....do these people not know who they are voting on.... are those areas failing because of the white leaders???
Report This
By: James on 2/17/2010 10:46AM
People of color have always voted for those outside of their race. When they see a candidate that they believe in they tend to vote for him or her. Race really isn't an issue. Just look at the history of cities where the minority population is the majority. They don't vote for a person just because of his or her race. Minorities more then the majority race tend to vote based on issues.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: G REDD on 2/17/2010 3:22AM
I WOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW THE NUMBER OF BLACK FOLKS THAT ACTUALLY VOTED IN THE ELECTION. I CANNOT IMAGINE THAT THE VOTE REPRESENTS SOME GREAT SHIFT IN COLOR LINE VOTING AS MUCH AS IT DOES WHAT THEY HAVE TO CHOOSE FROM. I DID A LOT OF VOTER REGISTRATION AROUND PRESIDENT OBAMA'S ELECTION AND I HONESTLY THINK THAT THE DEMOGRAPHIC HAS CHANGED BECAUSE THOSE NEW VOTERS ARE NOW AWARE OF WHAT THEIR VOTE CAN DO. YOU SITED A LIMITED NUMBER OF INSTANCES, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE NUMBERS BEFORE I WOULD CONCEED THAT ETHNOCENTRIC VOTING PATTERNS ARE A THING OF THE PAST!!!!!!!
BE SAFE, BE WELL AND BE BLESSED!!!!! " G "
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: jimydancer on 2/19/2010 3:50PM
There is no post racial anything and if anything racism has increased with the election of Obama.
Tell you truth the term and the directions sounds a whole lot like some of that new black republican squash...............
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Fred M. Abel Jr. on 2/27/2010 9:34PM
The thing that i see is that one blames one and the other does the same,,what i would like to see maby one day is .that we are as one and there is no more color,then we can vote as people and all be as one ,and we vote as people of the country ,and not who can blame the other,,and no matter if you are black and i am white,we will work and do things as one color ,no matter who or what color we are,
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: frank on 3/03/2010 12:52AM
What government program has ever worked?...what has the democratic party done for us?.....if health care program is so cheap and good for all....let congress try it first.
Reply to this Comment | Report This