With their stubborn refusal to compromise and efforts to use the issue as a way to win seats in the upcoming midterm elections, I don't see what choice Democrats have but to push health care reform through by using a simple majority vote that will eliminate Republican parliamentary efforts to halt it.The issue is of paramount importance for the 46-million Americans without coverage, for businesses struggling to compete because of the ridiculous cost of health care, for the millions of Americans denied coverage for pre-existing conditions and for this country's long-term financial success, but obviously not to members of the Republican party, none of whom voted in favor of the Senate bill.
Under the White House call for a "simple up-or-down" vote, the house would, according to the Associated Press, "pass the Senate bill and send it to Obama. The Senate would then use budget reconciliation rules to make several changes demanded by House Democrats. Those rules prohibit filibusters."
"We're not talking about changing any rules here," White House Health Reform Director Nancy-Ann DeParle said on 'Meet the Press.' "All the president's talking about is: Do we need to address this problem and does it make sense to have a simple, up-or-down vote on whether or not we want to fix these problems?"
This issue is not one that should be about politics. Republicans have plotted from the beginning to do just that. Let's not forget the comment from Republican Sen. Jim DeMint's about health care reform: "If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him."President Obama has reached out to Republicans and asked them to weigh in on the issue. A nationally televised health care summit, with Democrats and Republicans, yielded nothing except more Republican demands to start from scratch. Why?
"There are a number of other Republicans who do not think something of this magnitude ought to be jammed down the throats of a public that doesn't want it through this kind of device," Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said on CNN.
If Republicans were truly interested in compromise, they would try and make the bill the best it could be. Instead, they have muddied the issue. They have led voters to believe that this is a vote about the government intruding into their lives. They have stoked fear in the elderly about death panels and the middle class about exorbitant costs, two groups that could benefit from this bill. Voters elected a majority of representatives who are in favor of the proposal. Why talk about future elections? The representatives we have are there to do a job right now.
I like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's thinking on the issue. "We're not here just to self-perpetuate our service in Congress," she said on the Sunday morning talks shows. "We're here to do the job for the American people."
Pelosi referenced the struggle to pass Medicare and Social Security, which provides care for millions of Americans and are popular parts of our safety net. The same talk about America becoming a socialist regime were being bandied then too.
The same efforts to stop those reforms "decades ago are at work again against this bill," said Pelosi.
Those Democrats worried about losing their seats in upcoming elections should let it go. You were elected to serve, not to remain in office for life. If you are going to lose your seat, now is the time to at least make a stand.


Comments: (4)
Add a comment
By: KK on 3/01/2010 11:24AM
It's not that the Republican's don't want coverage for all. Even many Democrats are backing away from it. Why? Because it's a very bad bill. It does nothing to curb the escalating costs of health care and it will be a financial disaster for all of us.
Tell me, where is the feasibility study to prove this will not bankrupt us? Where is any research that says they have taken everything into account and can prove this will be better for the nation? There isn't one! They don't care if it's feasible, they only want to "prove that they can govern."
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: ana on 3/04/2010 12:33PM
Health care and Jobs for all are basic fundamental rights!If we are still at odds over simple issues as these,then we are in serious trouble as a country!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Bill Watson on 3/01/2010 11:02PM
Kill this bill and start over.
Mr. President if you are going to jam a bill through do it for the people who elected you not the healthcare industry.
The Presidential plan is a terrible plan it is 2700 pages, so far, of schemes and angles to enrich the heath care industry while exploiting consumers, employers, and the United States Treasury.
Passing the 2700 page bill with tweaking will not lower ever increasing costs nor will it cure the historic sins and unacceptable insurance practices of withholding or denying care which have bankrupted and killed patients.
Only a public option which eliminates insurance companies and eliminates for profit private care providers can cure the conflict between profit motive and evidence based care decisions.
The ugly truth is denying care increases profits.
There is nothing in this bill worth saving; it is worse than no bill.
The best fix for health care reform will require two options which will give everyone the opportunity to choose either free public; (NHC) national health care, or to privately purchase and receive private care.
National Health System users would never have to pay another insurance premium, medical service co pay fee, or any prescription costs.
No more medical bankruptcies, no more uninsured people denied care, no more forced dilemmas between going without food or other necessities in order to pay for needed medications or care.
Everyone choosing government care could have it free with no restrictions.
Jam this through.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: PEACHES on 3/19/2010 12:12PM
BILL:
THE HEALTHCARE BILL CANNOT START FRESH. TO START OVER IT NEEDS 60 VOTES. THERE ARE ONLY 59 DEMOCRATS PRESENT MAKING THIS CHOICE TO START OVER OBVIOUSLY IMPOSSIBLE.
Report This