The Loop 21 is a dynamic, new African American news site taking the pulse of America regarding race, politics and more. The site just completed its second annual race and media survey, in which "Journalists of color from around the country weighed in on the explosive issue of racial news coverage" (TheLoop21.com). A regular contributor to both the Loop 21 and the Huffington Post, political commentator Keli Goff took some time out to discuss the results of this survey from a fresh perspective. If you want your voice to be heard on these issues, head over to the Loop to take their second survey on race in the news, which investigates how the public views the media's treatment of people of color, as opposed to journalists. Let's hear what Keli has to say about race relations, Desiree Rogers, Obama's future and more. So, tell us, Keli, have you always been a journalist?
I actually started out in politics. My first big gig was as an intern on Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign when I was at NYU. Because of that experience, I ended up working as a congressional aid for a congresswoman here in New York. Then I worked in communications for non-profits that had a political focus. I was doing that during the day and going to Columbia and getting my master's at night, and I sold my first book while I was there. It's called 'Party Crashing: How the Hip-Hop Generation Declared Political Independence.' I had this idea based on conversations with friends about there being a big change in terms of the politics of young, black Americans. I would bring it up with different white friends who had varying degrees of prominence. Some people were elected officials, some people were high-ranking staffers – and no one had any idea that there was a difference between an 80-year-old black voter in the south and a young, educated 25-year-old black voter in an urban environment. There was this idea that we are all exactly alike, and I knew that this is just not true. So I had this idea, and through a series of twists and turns, I was linked up with my agent, and that's how we sold my first book. Obviously the timing kind of worked out because we had a chapter called "Generation Obama," and the book came out during the presidential primary.
Race & Media
View more presentations from InTheLoop.
How would you describe TheLoop21.com?
It's a news site first and foremost. It makes sure to highlight perspectives that are relevant to African Americans. At first it's easy to say "oh, it's a black news site." But I think this survey is a perfect example of how there can be a distinction between something that's just a news site, or an outlet that is mindful of capturing the perspectives of African Americans.
Your site just completed its annual race and media survey of journalist of color. What was the most surprising finding of the survey?
I'm not really surprised by anything that came out of the survey. I say that because, there are so many findings that just make sense. For example, the fact that so many journalists believe that the media during President Obama's first year has actually made race relations worse. I don't think it's actually surprising if you are involved in media in some capacity.
Because we all know, particularly if you are in a mainstream media outlet with big corporate bottom lines, that the priority is ratings and dollars. So, which is more likely to get stronger ratings? The idea of spending a year talking about stuff that's going well and singing "Kumbayah"? Or focusing on the handful of people who are carrying swastika signs and ripping up Rosa Parks posters? That's what gets focused on, even though I don't believe that represents the majority of Americans. But if you turn on the news, you would think "I guess black people shouldn't leave their apartments. It's bad out there." I don't think that is entirely representative. I think that's what gets good ratings.
Right now, theLoop21.com is conducting a survey geared towards the public to gauge their feelings about race as reported on in the media. What do you think you might find?
I have a strong feeling that if you ask the average person of color "Do you think that your perspective is represented on the news," the answer is going to be "no." That's unfortunate, but it just proves that we have some work to do.
Some of the good news I want to highlight – and I don't think it's a coincidence – is that since the president's election we now have more African American White House correspondents. That's a great sign of progress we need to pay attention to. It's not enough, but I think we're getting there. That's the upside of where we're headed as a country. We just have a little more work to do to get there.
What news outlets can you recommend as being accurate and fair in reporting on race?
There's a lot of exciting stuff happening. I'm sure you know about TheRoot.com, which does some interesting commentary. There are actually a lot of sites that are on the horizon. The gossip site Bossip is launching something called TheAtlantaPost.com. It's not up yet, but I have already been interviewed for it in a debate section about politics, which says it is heading in a more hard news direction.
The other thing I would add is, we don't want to be in a position where we are just dependent on news sites that are exclusively for people of color – even though I think that they are great and needed. We want to get to a place where people feel that mainstream outlets are making a concerted effort to highlight the perspectives of communities of color.
What do you think are some of the most common misrepresentations of blacks in news programming?
I think one of the most damaging things is the belief that African Americans are not interested in substantive programming. That's really frustrating, because the election showed that we are and we care. We are a very diverse community. But often there is a lack of diversity among the people who make these types of decisions. I think people panic, and err on the side of caution and unfortunately in our case, err on the side that underestimates our intelligence, our reach and our scope.
Are there black news pundits who are intentionally distorting our image for their own gain?
I think you ask a very fair question, but I don't think it's limited to black people. I can think of a number of people, being on the pundit circuit, who you learn quickly are playing different roles -- people who are black, white and every other color in between – because, for whatever reason, it enhances whatever they are trying to build up career-wise. It becomes more complicated when that person is part of a group that is not on television as often. Fundamentally it's always going to go back to the outlet, because it's the responsibility of the news outlet to represent every community as fairly and accurately as it can. I don't know how much to put blame on someone because their phone rings, and they get asked to come on a lot, and they say yes!
So I hear the criticism, but I just don't think it's fair to say that people who don't represent how the majority of black people vote on an issue should not be allowed to have a media platform.
How do you think President Obama is doing? Do you think the health care bill will pass?
This is probably the first chance I am getting to say this on the record, but I believe that pursuing health care in the first year was a tactical error. That's not an entirely popular view point with people in the base, but so be it. It forced the president to spend political capital he hadn't really yet built up.
But if you are president, the buck always has to stop with you. He made the choice to go after health care, and do all this compromising. The good news for him, and the polls seem to bear this out, is that fundamentally, Americans appear to like him and his family, and they trust him. That's something that money cannot buy. As long as he holds on to that, he will be in good shape.
What do you think of the whole Desiree Rogers incident? A lot of our members believe she was thrown under a bus.
If that's what they think, then I need to correct the record on that. That's definitely not true. If she was going to be thrown under a bus, she would have been forced to testify before Congress. And in fact they did the opposite – she wasn't forced to. And the only reason that is, is because people were protecting her, bending over backwards and forward to protect her from having to endure that.
As someone who's been to a White House event, the disconnect for a lot of people who don't understand why it was considered Rogers' fault is that, while fundamentally it was a security breech, it was a breech that was enabled by the fact that there was no one there from the social office to balance out the final say-so with the secret service. And that was because, she, according to all published reports, eliminated that position. That's why fundamentally, the buck stops with her. As I said on air, as someone who has attend a White House function before, you go through secret service, but then there is a person with a familiarity of the attendees with a clip board to say "Oh, Keli arrived, I know her." That person wasn't there. And the reason she wasn't there was because, apparently Rodgers eliminated the position. So as fabulous as she really is, you can't say that there is absolutely no blame there.
Also, all that being said, that's not the entire reason why she was done in. I joke in a piece on The Loop, that it's almost as though she was treated like an accused witch in Salem. And her real crime was not what happened at the state dinner. It was really her not fitting in in Washington. She didn't dress right, she had her fancy degree. There is a coterie of the old Washington guard that has run plenty of people out of town. Rogers wasn't the first, and she won't be the last in all likelihood.
Thanks for your time and your insights, Keli. To close, would you mind sharing your favorite inspiring piece of wisdom or favorite quote with the Black Voices audience?
On my door I keep a Bill Cosby quote that reads, "I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody." It is a particularly useful piece of advice when you are a writer who often challenges other people and their ideas.
+Head over to the Loop 21 to take their latest survey on race in the news, which investigates how the public views the media's treatment of people of color!


Comments: (10)
Add a comment
By: Hilroy on 3/05/2010 8:47AM
The scary part is that blacks or any of the President's supporters are keepng quiet when he is being treated the way he is.
If he was white he would be considered a miracle worker and a good first year president.
I HAD HOPE FOR AMERICA BUT SEEING THE WAY THIS MAN IS BEING TREATED, I CAN ONLY SAY CONFIDENTLY THAT THE CANCER OF RACISM WILL ONE DAY DESTROY AMERICA. FOR THE GOOD OF AMERICA,I HOPE I AM WRONG.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Vickiss on 3/05/2010 11:47AM
Actually the cancer of racism is what keeps America alive.
Report This
By: Kaevonda Smith on 3/07/2010 8:14AM
Great article! I totally agree with Ms. Goff about President Obama trying to reform healthcare first.. . .especially when so many people just want a job. I really think that it will go down as the President's biggest blunder. As far as Ms. Rogers, it was obvious that she was being protected. Frankly, she may be a friend to the first family but she was definately expendable. I will go to the Loop and check out the survey.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: toyna on 3/05/2010 7:45PM
Hey Bill, You're either a paranoid figure of your imagination or just damn stupid? You racist neanderthals will never go away, No one will ever trust any of your kind, The only reason you people do your dirty work in secret is because ''YOU NO DAMN WELL NO ONE IS AFRAID OF YOU'' HELL WILL BE PAID.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: John Lindsay on 3/06/2010 10:54AM
Bill Schrier (BS): It's BLACK RACISM that will destroy this nation. White racism has disappeared,
JL: Bullcrap.
After Obama became president, the number of White supremacist groups increased from 888 to 926....and still growing.
Here in Kentucky during the May 2009 presidential primary, 2 out of 5 White voters told pollsters that "they did not vote for Obama because of his "race."
Since we know that Whites "tend to be untruthful when asked to share beliefs about 'race' with pollsters, the actual number was likely to be 3 or 4 out of 5.
"Three or 4 out of 5" is significantly supported by the fact that in the November election, Obama only won 3 out of Kentucky's 120 counties. Three out of 120 counties.
There are over 190,000 hate crimes committed in America each year, but less than .001% are reported in the mainstream media.
The Southern Poverty Law Center has 2 publications that provide a state-by-state or city-by-city breakdown on hate crimes....and a hate crimes map.
You can also receive a FREE e-mail report called Hatewatch that documents such crimes.
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups
Many states in America do NOT have a hate crimes law, and thus such crimes are classified as just assault, vandalism, murder, etc.....which makes the official number of hate crimes lower than what it should be.
Besides these hate crimes, there is racial profiling by White police officers, employment discrimination, environmental racism, a racial disparity in the giving of the death penalty, low expectations by White teachers of Black & Latino students, the exclusion of People of Color's accomplishments & contributions to America and the world in the curriculums of K-12 and most colleges, and on and on and on.
And what about the Florida voting mess, in which Black voters were unfairly scrubbed from the voting rolls, the dilapidated voting machines in predominantly Black areas, police roadblocks near Black voting precincts...which were setup to deter Blacks from voting because they had to wait so long to get through the roadblocks, etc.
White racism has NOT disappeared.
bs: The black race hustlers exploit imagined racism for profit .. ... they always get what they want.
JL: Hmmm.
Everyone knows that Texaco's executives were using the phrase "black jelly beans" to refer to "discrimination against Black applicants and Black employees."
CBS's 60 Minutes covered this crap.
Bill, please provide a list of examples that are reflective of "Black racism" that would be parallel to the 190,000 hate crimes committed by both White supremacists organizations and individual racists...as well as examples of Black cops harassing White drivers, Black employers discriminating against White job applicants or White employees, Black teachers who don't think White students can learn, Black city, state, or federal officials who place toxic dumps near White residential areas, etc., etc., etc.
You can't do it. All you can do is to write that "labeling an act as racism" is racism itself."
And it's not.
Describing acts of racism committed by White people...is NOT an act of racism.....as many Whites often claim.
How can you address any problem...if you cannot name or describe the problem?!
Keli Goff: Or focusing on the handful of people who are carrying swastika signs and ripping up Rosa Parks posters? That's what gets focused on, even though I don't believe that represents the majority of Americans.
JL: Racism doesn't just involve "people carrying swastika signs and ripping up Rosa Parks posters."
I would VERY HAPPY if those (signs & posters) were the only racist things that were happening.
Instead, as I noted in my statements to bill, discrimination is PERVASIVE in America, ranging from police officers to teachers to social workers to prosecutors to judges to juries to city/state/federal officials etc., etc., etc.
Having a Black president has NOT changed the economic, educational, political, and social structures or institutions of amerikkka.
I will admit that some change has occurred....but we still have a long, long way to go.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: John Lindsay on 3/06/2010 11:03AM
I forgot to add that "trying to play down racism"...will not end racism.
It is only through the EXPOSURE OF RACISM...that racism decreases.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mike on 3/06/2010 1:21PM
John Lindsay, seems like anybody can find data to support and conclusion.
It only took about 1.1 seconds on bing to find almost 6,000 websites to show just how bad black against white hate crimes are.
The loudly promoted “hate crime epidemic” in America is an illusion.
Jacobs and Potter examine many of the myths and problems surrounding the idea of hate crimes, showing, among other things, that the loudly promoted “hate crime epidemic” in America is an illusion. Hate crimes have never been more than a tiny fraction of overall violent crime, and the numbers have actually been holding steady or decreasing in recent years.22
The authors also reveal the surprising statistics regarding interracial crime. It turns out that 80 percent of violent crimes involve an attacker and victim of the same race. “For the 20 percent of violent crimes that are interracial, 15 percent involve black offenders and white victims; 2 percent involve white offenders and black victims; and 3 percent involve other combinations.”23
These statistics include all instances of interracial violent crime, not just those labeled “hate crimes.” To see the rates of anti-white and anti-black violence that have been categorized as hate crimes, one only needs to take a cursory look at the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports specifically on hate crime to see that blacks commit them at a higher rate than whites.24
According to the US Census Bureau’s most recent projection (for Sept. 1, 2000), 82.2 percent of the US population is white, while 12.8 percent is black. If Hispanics are excluded from both counts, then the numbers are 71.4 percent white and 12.2 percent black.25
In the most recent year for which FBI data are available (1998), we see that there were 2,084 anti-black hate crimes committed by whites, and 567 anti-white hate crimes committed by blacks. Though the absolute number of anti-black crimes is 3.6 times as high as anti-white crimes, keep in mind that there are almost six times as many whites as blacks in the US. To get a true picture, we need to look at the proportional rates.
Eighty percent of violent crimes involve an attacker and victim of the same race.
If we divide each population by the number of crimes committed by individuals in that population, we see that there was one anti-black attack for every 94,436 white people, but one anti-white attack for every 59,172 black people. Thus, the rate of black-perpetrated hate crimes against whites is approximately 1.6 times higher than the rate of white-perpetrated hate crimes against blacks.
Looking at hate crimes involving death and rape tells an even starker story. In 1998 five white people were killed in hate crimes, while three black people were killed in the same period. During that year, four women of each race were raped as a result of racial hatred. If these incidents were occurring between the races at equal rates based on their populations, we’d expect to see six times as many blacks killed and raped by whites as the opposite. Yet we see an equal number of rapes and almost twice as many anti-white slayings.
How can we ever hope to bridge the racial divide if we won’t even look at the hard facts of racism?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: just on 3/06/2010 10:11PM
I hate when whites and blacks refer to "imagined" racism as if the people who experience it don't know what the heck they are talking about.
I also hate when white people witness overt racism and say that isn't racist." I personally don't like white people interpreting my experiences because 95% of the time they are wrong.
I don't believe white people and most of the really successful black people (especially image promoters, high ranking executives and politicians) are in a position to speak openly about this lest they be punished economically or career wise.
The Black community, because of racism, currently does not have an ambassador of any sorts to speak to issues of racism because white people tend to discredit anyone who does and punish them with whatever power they have. They want to promote the image that America has moved into a "post-racial" arena But racism is the one thing they won't own up to - we all know they have a best friend that is black
Then they go on to promote and orchestrate scenarios using outdated stereotypes which makes them feel they are correct.
There is something mentally wrong with almost an entire group of people (white people) being in denial about what the world knows is racially tainted behavior. Who is going to heal this mental illness of white america?
Because of their illness, I don't want them interpreting my experience.
Report This
By: Trudy on 3/07/2010 12:55AM
I wondered about the Desiree Rogers situation. Thanks for the insight
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: REDHEELS on 3/07/2010 8:37AM
The bias reporting and RACIALLY motivated stories won't end until there is some demographic change in this U.S. - And that's the ONLY way Black People will see CHANGE and benefit, in any way, form or fashion. We're talking another 30, 40 years for things to be done right and fairly? And many of them do NOT believe it doing what's "right and fair".
The establishment has been doing THIS for a good 300-400 years
And as we ALL know, "what goes around comes around".
Reply to this Comment | Report This