
In a dispute eerily reminiscent of the one between Larry Summers and Cornel West, Chicago literary and civil rights icon Haki Madhubuti resigned last week as an educator at Chicago State University after 26 years, citing vengefulness on the part of his new boss.
"This is a difficult time for me. Because of circumstances beyond my control, I have been forced to seek early retirement," Madhubuti said in a statement issued to attendees of the Gwendolyn Brooks Conference for Black Literature and Creative Writing. He is 68 years old.
"On June 22 , 2009, I issued an open letter to the University community, in regards to the appointment of our current president, Dr. Wayne Watson," said the Third World Press founder and Chicago Public Schools charter operator. "I questioned in no uncertain language the flawed and undemocratic process in which he was selected. I was as fully aware when I issued the letter as I am now that all actions have consequences."
First reported by Chicago Sun-Times columnist Mary Mitchell, Madhubuti said his split from the University came after Watson, who took the helm of the South Side institution last year, demoted him.
Madhubuti is one of the world's best-selling authors of poetry and non-fiction, with books in print in excess of 3 million.
He began his career in publishing when he met poet Gwendolyn Brooks, who encouraged him to publish a collection of poetry. Madhubuti self-published and distributed "Think Black." He sold several hundred copies within a week. A year later, in 1967, he and two partners launched Third World Press in the basement of his Chicago apartment with $400 and a mimeograph machine. The publishing house set a precedent for publishing black authors, including literary greats such as Amiri Baraka, Gwendolyn Brooks and Chancellor Williams.
Madhubuti is also the co-founder of the Institute of Positive Education/New Concept Development Center and co-founder of Betty Shabazz International Charter School, founder and board member of the National Association of Black Book Publishers and founder and director of the National Black Writers Retreat, among other projects, including a private preschool he founded with his wife.
He was employed at the school at a salary of more than $100k, which is customary for professors who bring prestige to universities. These level of professors are required to pursue scholarly pursuits outside of the classroom, and at many elite institutions, are given a lighter course load. The results are two-fold: it brings more students to the university and students get the opportunity to work with professors who actually work in the field.
Madhubuti said Watson demanded he teach four courses a semester-rather than one-removed him from the paid staff of the Gwendolyn Brooks Center he founded and reduced him to volunteer status with the master's program in creative writing that he co-founded.
"I am convinced that this move against me is personal and vindictive," Madhubuti said. "Although I did agree to increase my course load, I rejected the points that removed me from the structures I founded and co-founded at the university."
On Madhubuti's decision to leave, Dr. Watson said, "That is his decision. I am only asking him to teach."
Madhubuti has filed a grievance against the university.
Should Madhubuti have stayed at the university? Is there a good reason for removing someone from a program that he founded?


Comments: (6)
Add a comment
By: Orion on 4/06/2010 12:58PM
Dr. Wayne Watson the President since October 09, has requested Madhubti to teach a full load and Watson is being slamed for doing so.
Haki Madhubuti is an estemeed and prolific writer. He has given a public resignation because Watson required accountability and a full teaching load of 12 hours. Previously Madhubuti has been teaching 3 hours a year for a full salary. Quite the job, wouldn't you say. Enters new boss asking for accountability and responsibility and you claim that you are being mistreated. What kind of thinking is this?
Most people would be pleased to have a full salary for 3 hours of work per year. Wow, in these economic times, do the math. Madhubuti has had generous support from Chicago State University with an annual conference and the formation of The Gwendolyn Brooks Center.These are major achievements. In these hard economic times, state funding budget cuts, it would not be realistic to keep things the same. A touch of reality enters. No one on the planet, not even the President of the United States, can work only three hours a year and justify a full salary. No one is that distinguished.
Watson became President of Chicago State after much controversy but I wonder why didn't Haki Madhubuti apply for the position? He seems to be saying if you break up my playground and make me work like the other Distinguished Professors, I will take my books and go home. Chicago State Unviersity is a teaching university and the most important thing a professor can do is teach, hands on. This is what great professors do.
Watson is providing leadership and asking his faculty to be accountable and responsible. What's wrong with that? Wouldn't you like to work for full salary and work only three hours a week. Wow. What a job.
Everyone should be able to see through this.
At 26 years and age 68 and a salary of $110,000, Don has maxed out in his pension and has so many outside interests that faarting around at CSU is no longer worth his while.
However, instead of retiring and showing the selfish side, he trumps up this mess in order to become a martyr, in the true tradition of the radical '60s Mau-Maus.
Nice scam.
Will you
look into the face
of a student who has no Pell grant,
No MAPP grant,
and more loans
than is right or fair
And say that your work
is more important?
That students
must pay for non-teaching when
they desparately need to learn?
That is my poem of resistence!
To those who equate Don Lee (Haki) to other "Star" professors at other universities with respect to workload and salary, you are comparing apples to oranges.
Yes, this may be the case at major research instutitions where the "star" professor brings in millions of dollars in research grant dollars to the school or attacts the best and brightest PhD candidates to the school, adding to its prestige.
Don does/did not do either.
The only one that benefitted from Don's work was Don (and his spouse).
Furthermore, one could say that Don started this whole mess with the poison pen open letter he wrote criticizing the process of the selection of the new president - not too smart for a man pre-emptively bites the hand that feeds him.
So you can count me as another who supports Dr. Watson on this one. This guy Haki has been pillaging CSU for years. Since he did not take a salary from 3rd World Press, you could say that CSU/the Taxpayers basically subsidized that business venture by providing him a one class load job, health insurance, office space and a platform to promote himself.
2008 information on Haki (Don Lee is his "slave" name) Madhubuti.
From: http://www.archive.org/details/StateUniversitiesOfIllinoisSalaries2008
Name: Lee, Don L
Title: Professor English
Start Date: 08/16/84
Salary: $110,928.00
Plus his spouse (Carol Lee) has a nice gig as a Professor at Northwestern University, so there will be no tag days for them.
He is 68 years old and can start enjoying his $90,000 plus per year pension and free lifetime health insurance.
At issue are the students of CSU and an administration, faculty and policies that prepare these students for professions and success in a growing global community. How many letters has this professor written, using his stature and name recognition in support of additional funding for CSU not associated with his department? How many elected officials has he lobbied on behalf of the university not associated with a program directly linked to him? The question is legitimate because Dr. Madhubuti wrote that his support extends beyond his department to the entire institution, its mission and all of its students.
There is no way anyone could accomplish so much beyond the university walls and have teaching be a priority. If being asked to earn his salary by taking on a full time teaching schedule after twenty-five years of the university supporting all of his outside endeavors is so distasteful that it warrants such indignation, then respectfully Dr. Madhubuti, just accept that your other initiatives have a greater priority and move on quietly. Don’t try to hurt the man who is trying to make the best use of university resources by paying professors a full time salary that actually teach full time.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Bomani Kyasa on 12/26/2011 5:40PM
The Great Haki Madhhubuti is one the most important, seminal artist of the 20th century. Professor Madhubuti desreves the same rights, privileges,and respect accorded to a luminary of his stature. As usual, when it is time for an African-American to enjoy the customary accoutrements befitting a world reknown activist scholar, the rules change. This is is not only an cynical effort to disenfranchise a courageous exemplar of apllied, Black Nationalist/Revolutionary Theory; but it seeks to deprive a world-class intellect, the paid creative space acrrued by tenure and excellence that his counterparts enjoy. One cannot produce great literature by teaching four (4)classes a term. This is an an egregious insult to Dr. Madhubuti, the Pan-African Liberation Movement and to academia, as a whole.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Orion on 4/09/2010 5:51PM
I've been reading this story for a couple of days waiting for it to make sense. It still doesn't.
I don't understand why Mitchell called it a public fight, when it wasn't public until she wrote about it? (And it is notable that no other media outlet picked the story up).
I don't understand why
Mitchell wrote 2 stories in three days, the first about a non-existent feud and the second to foment public response about the non-existent feud, unless the something about the relationship between these two that we don't know. Where is a good ethical editor when you need one?
So these are my questions.
First, when would an English Professor work for the President? He wouldn't. He would work for the Chair of the English Department. But the Chair of the English Department is three levels below the President. So why does this professor call the president "his boss?". It doesn't pass the sniff test that this is a real feud.
Second, Emeritus status is always an unpaid status. I don't understand why this Professor thinks that he should be paid when there is a Director of the Center Quraysh Ali Lansana, Director, Gwendolyn Brooks Center, Associate Professor of English/Creative Writing. Is Chicago State supposed to pay two Directors for this center? Is the media being used in an effort to get the CSU to back down?
Third - retiring is the way to get what he wants, to be paid (he will get a pension), and he won't have to teach. So why not just take that option instead of creating this noise?
Fourth - why does Madhubuti think that an obscure letter he wrote a year ago is even relevant? Everyone but him had forgotten about it a year ago.
Fifth - If Haki would rather retire than teach, why does he think that there was a move against him? Why isn't it just that he exercised an option to retire which was available to him?
Sixth - Why is a 68 year old man retiring considered to be "an early retirement?"
Seventh - I don't believe CSU has a job called cultural icon, but if does, why doesn't Madhubuti apply for it and be done? If his job is an English Professor, why does he think he can be paid to be a cultural icon instead?
Eighth - If Madhubuti can teach somewhere else, why doesn't he just go there and teach? Why put CSU through the hoops? He has given up his slave name, and he should give up his slave mentality about work. Nobody forces him to take a check from CSU.
Nineth - If he doesn't teach, why would he be missed? How many students even know who he is or that he has an office at CSU?
Last, why pick now? Why pick this way, (in the papers) rather than civilized and behind closed doors. Why not show the students the courtesy of not bringing dishonor to CSU with public name calling and mudslinging - if you have any students you care about?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: sedi on 7/12/2011 8:07AM
i am persian girl from iran
iam apoet
ilove your poem
i wrote a book for you
pleas take me your nomber tl
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Heloise.Leslie on 7/05/2011 10:11AM
Sounds like a case of double dipping. He was paid to teach at CSU but was doing his own thing. If distinguished status why getting paid on the public dole really? I would question his doings not those of CSU admin.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: sedi salari on 7/18/2011 9:50AM
Hi haki
i am a poet from iran. i wrote abook for you.
i am going to translate your poems.
please send your email adress for me.
i like you.
Reply to this Comment | Report This