
The killing took place in a wealthy suburb in Connecticut and went unsolved for decades. Skakel's attorneys, Hope Seeley and Hubert Santos, said that it was a "travesty" that the Connecticut courts would not allow the jury to see new evidence.
"Fairness and justice require no less," they said in a statement.
The attorneys plan to file another appeal, arguing that Skakel's former attorney, Michael Sherman, had provided inadequate counsel in the first case. They claim that he was unable to properly investigate the crime because he was having financial difficulties.
Skakel is now 49 years old and sought a new trial after a student from the same private school as Skakel implicated two other friends. The request was turned down by a judge in 2007, so Skakel then appealed to the highest court in the state. The friend implicating the other men has refused to speak to the media.
The judge argues that Skakel's theory is improbable because a large black man and a second man of mixed race would have stood out in this neighborhood.
"These three young men did not look like the average fourteen or fifteen year olds who would have blended into the crowd, particularly not in an area that was described by one witness as 'a fairly lily-white community,'" Justice Joette Katz wrote for the majority.
If it is indeed the case that Michael Skakel was framed and tried for a crime he didn't commit, then that would be highly unfortunate. However, if he and his attorneys are using the "black man did it" as their "Get out of jail free" card, then we should all be offended. Accusing black defendants of crimes they did not commit is not only unethical, but quite frequent and telling. It reminds us that our nation is one that is likely to believe that black men are criminals and social deviants. Such perceptions play a role in our justice system, which is why the United States has become a world leader in the numbers of black men it has been willing to incarcerate.
All families have a black sheep and this includes the Kennedy family. In spite of the great things the family has done for America and the African American community, Skakel's conviction is a reminder that even the best of us are never perfect.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and the author of the new book, "Black American Money." To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 

Comments: (7)
Add a comment
By: ADMR on 4/13/2010 7:00PM
Good Evening Dr Boyce...6:04
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: John Lindsay on 4/13/2010 10:00PM
This case was profiled on one of the "cold Case" shows back in the early 90s.
The Greenwich police bungled the case due to inexperience in investigating this type of case.
The evidence that was presented on the show...strongly implicated Skakel, but his wealth and family influence allowed him to remain untried for 27 years.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: amishfarmer on 4/15/2010 12:35PM
This clown should have been "fried" years ago. This just goes to show you that in MA you can get away with murder if you have Kennedy ties. Fat Ted did!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: A BLACK Male Did It on 4/14/2010 1:17PM
BLACK SNAKE MOANed Early.......Those Who perpetuate Stereotypes Are N******, then Wonder Why Many Are perceived the way many are...
SMH GENTLEMEN - Watched ONE(s)
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: nellis on 4/16/2010 3:17PM
Did Mike get his analysis of history from a comic book?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Che on 4/17/2010 7:57PM
Everybpdy give Mike a round of applause for getting off subject!!
The article is about a man who killed another human being and does not want to do time for it. This is not about a Kennedy dating a black male or female. Stop it. It is annoying and you are ignorant.
Next time you want to act racist, STAY ON TASK!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Nell on 4/18/2010 11:22AM
Yeah, Mike, what he said! I guess you didn't notice the unfortunate usage of the analogy of "black sheep" in Dr. Watkins' remarks. How about a riff on that negative connotation by one who should know better?
Reply to this Comment | Report This