
The women thought they were getting love -- or at least some physical gratification -- when the bedded down with Nushawn Williams, but the drug-abusing, sex-obsessed New York man was giving the gift of HIV to his victims instead.
Now, after serving 12 years for his despicable crime, New York authorities have a problem.
What are they to do with Williams, 33, upon his release, since he has shown little remorse for his crime, demonstrated violent behavior and just might try to infect more women?
The answer is to simply keep Williams in jail.
Under a civil law designed to keep dangerous offenders off the street even when they finish their prison term, New York authorities are seeking to keep Williams in jail indefinitely.
Civil libertarians may howl at the notion of keeping someone imprisoned after serving their sentence, and usually, I'd be right along with them.
But every now and then, a criminal will test the limits of how to balance an inmate's personal rights against the safety of society at large. And in this balance, I'm sorry, Mr. Williams, but you come out on the short end of the ledger.
It's bad enough that 13 women are at risk for doing nothing more than having had sex with him. It's amazing to me that Williams served just 12 years for what amounts to 13 counts of attempted murder.
Two of his victims who contracted HIV later had children born with the virus. Sickening.
The notion that even one more person should be threatened by Williams' freedom is a risk none of us can accept.
The authorities seeking to hold Williams should be forced to show exactly why he still poses a risk, and goals should be established for his behavior so that he, with the proper counseling, can work toward his release day.
But it doesn't sound like that day has come just yet, so until he is ready to be a productive citizen, Williams should cool his heels in prison.
A hearing is scheduled for Williams on May 6 to determine if there is enough evidence to hold him.


Comments: (87)
Add a comment
By: paul on 5/03/2010 11:58AM
We can beat this disease. We just need to put aside some of our "rights" and commit to it.
Mandatory periodic testing for EVERYONE and a small tattoo in the groin area of those who test positive. We'd have it contained within a generation. It's a serious disease and will just keep killing us if we don't take serious measures.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: john on 5/04/2010 1:01AM
adultery is bad too; you want to mark people for that?
Report This
By: PAM on 5/03/2010 6:55PM
THAT IS A GREAT IDEA, THEN AGAIN SOME PEOPLE DON;T EVEN BOTHER TO LOOK DOWN THERE
Report This
By: Andrew on 5/04/2010 6:55AM
Are you kidding if you have the tendency to be a dog it should be openly shown for all to see before you infect someone else. Otherwise if you are an innocent victim don't expose them.
Report This
By: paul on 5/04/2010 11:16AM
John:
Not a 'scarlet letter'. I'm not suggesting a punishment for being bad. This would be to stop the spread of a deadly scourge. There's a difference.
Anyone who thinks we should just keep doing what we're doing (which isn't working) either already has the disease or doesn't really care if it spreads.
You got a better idea?
Report This
By: smarttsista on 5/04/2010 10:45AM
That's actually a very good idea.
Report This
By: detmem on 5/04/2010 7:00PM
I have an idea; how about people taking responsibilty for their own actions. I for one am not willing to give up rights just because some people refuse to be responsible. Ever hear of condoms! or requiring the tests before you jump in the bed with someone.
Report This
By: Dunk on 5/23/2010 3:46PM
Here in California, there have been cases where a rapist has agreed to be castrated in exchange for prison release. Maybe New York should de-ball this fool.
Report This
By: Mike on 5/03/2010 12:45PM
Cut off his junk
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: john on 5/04/2010 1:01AM
Do you support the releasing of everyones HIV status so that the ones who are not HIV positive can report on HIV positive people having sex with non-HIV positive people? You want to cut off this man's jack; you should not want to limit your actions to just this one since many more are doing as this man. How are you going to cut off a female's sexual member/part to stop her? Are your going to stuff hers with something and glue it shut???? You seem intelligent on what to do with this man; I want to see can you extend your intelligence to the next logically step-wisdom. Oh that's right, you have to learn to treat all the same without biasness.Only a god thinks as you; the other God thinks of all the same-love, discipline, and mercy. My GOD.
Report This