
Michael, Michael, Michael. It's like he is a glutton for punishment. Either that or he has a press secretary who is secretly trying to destroy his career. In true Michael Steele style, he has released a nonsensical statement this morning opposing President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, dean of the Harvard law school. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against anyone's politics. I feel reasonable minds can disagree on a number of policies and ideas about how to achieve the same goal. With Steele, though, what I'm missing is the reasonable mind part.
Steele's statement reads:
"Over the past year, the American people have been witness to President Obama's massive expansion of the federal government in to our daily lives. To assure the American people, President Obama's Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, will need to demonstrate that she is committed to upholding the vision of our founding fathers, who wrote a Constitution meant to limit the power of government, not expand it. The president has stated repeatedly that he wants a justice who will understand the effects of decisions on the lives of everyday Americans. But what Americans want is a justice who will stay true to the Constitution and defend the rights of all Americans, adhering to the rule of law instead of legislating from the bench. Given Kagan's opposition to allowing military recruiters access to her law school's campus, her endorsement of the liberal agenda and her support for statements suggesting that the Constitution "as originally drafted and conceived, was "defective," you can expect Senate Republicans to respectfully raise serious and tough questions to ensure the American people can thoroughly and thoughtfully examine Kagan's qualifications and legal philosophy before she is confirmed to a lifetime appointment." (Source: Republican National Committee)
For those of you who have been too busy watching LisaRaye's reality show or planting sh*t in Farmville to stay up on things, Kagan was the former law clerk of Thurgood Marshall, the first African American Supreme Court justice who once famously used the word "defective" to refer to the government devised by America's 18th-century founders in a 1987 speech commemorating the bicentennial of the Constitution. In particular, Marshall discussed the Constitution's deliberate omission of equal rights for women and black slaves.
Marshall added that the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government ,and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights we hold as fundamental today. When contemporary Americans cite the Constitution, they invoke a concept that is vastly different from what the framers barely began to construct two centuries ago.
Apparently, Kagan's agreement and support of Marshall's statements offend Steele's sensibilities, because he would have no doubt preferred to remain a slave.
Additionally, in another perversion of facts, Steele objects to Kagan's refusal to allow military recruiters on her law school campus. What he doesn't say is that her objection was based on her opposition to the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, which she felt was discriminatory.
Dozens of law schools supported barring JAG recruiters, including Yale, Stanford, Harvard and my alma mater, Georgetown Law, because of DADT. Law schools did this not because they hate America and Jesus, but because they did not support a policy that prevented men and women from fighting for their country simply based on sexual orientation.
Steele's injection of misinformation with a splash of lunacy is truly a detriment to intelligent debate in this country.
Whether one agrees with Kagan's nomination is really not the point. Steele's implication that discrimination on the basis of sexuality is not problematic and that the Constitution was NOT defective as it was originally "drafted and conceived" is the real story here.
But I guess on some level it makes sense: If it were left up to him, he would still be three-fifths of a man, which would match his three-fifths of a brain.
Contrary to the foolishness of Steele, watch President Obama introduce Kagan to the world:


Comments: (17)
Add a comment
By: globe trotter on 5/10/2010 9:25PM
He did it again, another White woman ! I know his mother was White but,don't you think the president would try to pick a Black Women this time?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: lorry on 5/10/2010 9:35PM
! there is a "web//site" named "sexyblackwhite" for dateing or relationship, black or white singles can go there to find something sexy or beauty online !!!//www.sexyblackwhite.com
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: cherie on 5/10/2010 9:37PM
The selection of Elena Kagan is a slap in the face to all African-Americans. President Obama has had an opportunity of a lifetime- to select a Black Jurist to the highest court. Where is the outrage? Why are black organizations not protesting this nomination? An African American was not even seriously considered.President Obama was elected with 95% of the Black vote. What good is it to have a "BLACK" PRESIDENT if he ignores his people..... and forget making the argument that she is should be qualified because she clerked for Thurgood Marshall. It is a shame that the only Black Jurist on the court was nominated by President Bush.
Once again African-Americans are sent to the “back of the bus” and this time it is by one of our own…
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: pilotx on 5/10/2010 9:55PM
Relax, he will have at least one more SC appointee to make. And can you imagine the outrage if he did appoint a sista? In all fairness the next SC justice should be either an Asian, an Indigenous person or an atheist. Or a mixture of all of the above;-)
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Pattyanna on 5/11/2010 12:45AM
Would you also infer the Ten Commandments were defective as they didn't include the volumes of "manmade interpretations" since invoked to stretch their intent? The framers of the constitution enshrined the inalienable right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness to all. It's the people with an axe to grind who needed clarification...leading to chaotic upheavel that continues today at our border. Illegal is Illegal - even if you are a minority or a drug dealer.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: fostgraf on 5/11/2010 9:17AM
Some of the men that signed the Constitution had slaves. If they really meant " all men are created equal" they would have release their slaves. What they meant was all white men are created equal. Black men would have had equal rights from that moment on. We all know that didn't happen.
Report This
By: Michel Jons on 5/11/2010 10:16AM
Alright, do you think it's OK to call her a dyke? Regardless of her sexual orientation, she is well qualified for the job. The military is at its wits end looking for recruits because African-Americans and Hispanics and poor whites have realized it is not worth their time to do so amymore. Iraq is not fighting for our country. That was a bogus war and you know it. Afghanastan was something that was worth while. So is you want qualified people "Don't ask don't tell" will have to go. You know that as well. Stop with the name calling and oh by the way I'm all woman and I love my husband. I'm not a biggot!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Matthew Fogg on 5/11/2010 12:24PM
First let me be clear, the author of this piece is 100% on the mark of righteousness. Why are commenter's questioning Justice Thurgood Marshall's "defective" interpretation of the Constitution as written by the founders. That is in fact, the job of a Supreme Court Justice. That's why there are 9 and a consensus rules. The Constitution also gives the President the right to pick whomever he wants if they are qualified weather we like it or not. I would love for diversity to make up the nine but I would love even more, the nine interpret the laws as though each citizen was his/her mother, father, brother, sisters and or anyone they loved.
Just as I voted for Obama's obvious extraordinary leadership thus far, which has saved a great Republic from a profound Depression, I clearly trust his judgment to select a person who he believes will embody his vision of a more perfect union. Clearly, there are a heap of flaws in this great Republic today but not as nearly as many when it was created just to name legalized Slavery, genocide of Indigenous inhabitants and treatment of woman at that time. What amazes me is those inconsiderate Americans today who say "look at what is happening to this nation, it is going to the garbage pit." I say to those same selfish inconsiderate folks that, as a African American male - however bad you may think this great Republic is now, its much better for me and my ancestors than what you think we came from. Its no longer all about you and forget those other 2nd Class citizens. Not a sermon - just a thought!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mary on 5/11/2010 1:33PM
Michael Steele is another White Wash OJ. He will be coming back home to his (black folks) when the white folks kicks him under the bus.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: dacapo456 on 5/11/2010 3:28PM
Cherie you lack a reasonable perspective. Blacks represent 1 in 9 citizens in the U.S. Blacks also represent 1 in 9 supreme court justices. It is one of the few places where we are fully represented. If anyone has a beef it would be either women who represent 50% of society but never 50% of the court, or all races other than black, white, and hispanic because they have no representation at all.
Reply to this Comment | Report This