Rand Paul Compares Himself to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Comments (13)

Rand Paul on Civil Rights
When you think of a modern-day 21st century Martin Luther King Jr.,who do you think of? President Barack Obama? Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker ? Kwame Kilpatrick? (just kidding.)
Well, our favorite confederate candidate Rand Paul wants you to think of him when you think of great civil right leaders Martin Luther King, Jr. and Frederick Douglas.

Appearing on Rush Limbaugh's radio show yesterday, Rand Paul, who is in major damage control mode, is now trying to backtrack from his recent remarks, regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After a storm of outrage over his comments in defense of segregationist policies in private businesses, his handlers have come up with what may be the strangest PR strategy ever.
After stating that he would not have supported the Civil Rights Act in its current form, because he believes private businesses should have the right to discriminate without interference by the pesky government, he now states that he is an idealist and implies that he should be held in the same regard as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. or Frederick Douglas.

Instead of uttering a giant mea culpa and slinking off to Virginia, where he would be welcomed with open arms, Rand Paul has now decided to compare himself to Dr. King and to abolitionist Douglass, both of whom fought for the rights of people who look like me. They devoted their lives to combating racism so people who look like me could go in to those private businesses that Rand Paul thinks should be allowed to discriminate against me or anyone else they choose.

Now, I've heard of reverse psychology, but this rises to Jedi Mind Trick level. As Yoda would say, "WTF?"

While Dr. King fought against Jim Crow laws and segregation and Frederick Douglass fought against slavery, Rand Paul claims his major fight is to allow restaurants to let people smoke.

Jim Crow laws, segregation, smoking - yeah, I can see how they are all the exact same thing.

Here is his op-ed from the Bowling Green Daily News:

I am unlike many folks who run for office. I am an idealist. When I read history I side with abolitionists, such as William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglas
who fought for 30 years to end slavery and to integrate public transportation in the free North in the 1840s. I see our failure to end slavery for decade after decade as a failure of weak-kneed politicians. [...]


Segregation ended only after a great and momentous uprising by idealists like Martin Luther King Jr., who provoked weak-kneed politicians to action.

In 2010, there are battles that need to be fought, and they have nothing to do with race or discrimination, but rather the rights of people to be free from a nanny state.

For example, I am opposed to the government telling restaurant owners that they cannot allow smoking in their establishments.
I believe we as consumers can choose whether to patronize a smoke-filled restaurant or do business with a smoke-free option. Think about it - this overreach is now extending to mandates about fat and calorie counts in menus. Do we really need the government managing all of these decisions for us?

They say when you find yourself in a hole the first thing you need to do is stop digging. Dig on Rand Paul, just dig on.....


Comments: (11)

Add a comment

Page 1 of 2

Add a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed but they are required to confirm your comments. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password."

Most Commented Articles

Daily Drama

The Best Clips From TV's Hottest Shows


More Daily Drama >>

Find a Message Board

Discover conversations on everyone from Barack to Beyonce. There are nearly 50 forums, so click on a category below and find the right one for you.