
Meanwhile African Americans all over the country secretly prayed that he would not embarrass the race too badly. After his surprising, OK let's face it, bizarre, primary win, Greene gave the first speech of his non-campaign. After doing several awkward, bumbling and downright strange interviews with various media outlets, the South Carolina Democratic electorate now watched their miracle candidate nervously, hoping that, at the very least, all his subjects and verbs would agree.
So, how did he do in his first campaign appearance? Alvin Greene probably did better than most people thought he would. He didn't make any major errors, didn't use profanity and did not show pornography to the audience. He stayed on-topic (for the most part), focusing on his three major themes of jobs, education and justice. He talked about the fact that the country lost 125,000 jobs just last month.
Greene wants to focus on infrastructure projects, such as building roads, which he says the state needs to put South Carolinians back to work. Education would also be a priority if Greene is elected. He pointed out that South Carolina was 49th in high school drop-out rates and standardized test scores. Greene challenged parents of under-performing children to be more involved in their education. So far, so good.
Next, Greene hit the criminal justice system. This is when it got a little weird.
Next, Greene hit the criminal justice system. This is when it got a little weird.
Greene declared, "We need justice in the justice system. South Carolina spends twice as much on inmates than on students." OK, we're with you.... He talks about how first-time offenders should be offered alternatives to jail through programs like pre-trial intervention. So far so good. Then he starts to go off the rails.
He tells some bizarre story about "a guy" who got tangled up in the criminal justice system - we all know that when someone talks about "a guy" or "friend" he or she is probably talking about him or herself.
Anyway, this "guy" got in trouble, and although he qualified for pre-trial intervention, he was denied and the trial was delayed.
He tells some bizarre story about "a guy" who got tangled up in the criminal justice system - we all know that when someone talks about "a guy" or "friend" he or she is probably talking about him or herself.
Anyway, this "guy" got in trouble, and although he qualified for pre-trial intervention, he was denied and the trial was delayed.
"But," he says, suddenly looking off-kilter, as if he forgot where he was for a moment, "Moving on...."
You could almost hear the crowd's collective "WTF?"
All in all, it wasn't the utter and complete disaster we all have come to expect when Greene opens his mouth. He nervously read his notes from a black spiral notebook, wiped his brow and did his best to sound authoritative. Senatorial even.
You could almost hear the crowd's collective "WTF?"
All in all, it wasn't the utter and complete disaster we all have come to expect when Greene opens his mouth. He nervously read his notes from a black spiral notebook, wiped his brow and did his best to sound authoritative. Senatorial even.
He made a little quip in the beginning about being a perfect candidate for the NAACP Image Awards, although I have a sneaky suspicion that he didn't write that joke and didn't seem to know what it meant. Frankly, it didn't sound like he wrote any of it.
It sounded like a bunch of policy positions that had been cut and pasted from different websites the night before. Unfortunately, the only part that sounded genuine was that creepy part about his "friend." The 6 - 12 minute elocutionary extravaganza ended with Greene timidly waving, looking unsure of what he was supposed to do next.
I know you're not supposed to say this anymore, but what the hell, he looked kind of slow.
He cracked a child-like smile as he got a standing ovation before an audience of more than 400 in his hometown of Manning. Greene took no questions from the audience and hustled past a group of reporters on his way out of the building without stopping to talk.
Pamela Clavon Brunson, who attended the speech, said we should be proud of a young black man following his dream of becoming a U.S. Senator, even if he doesn't give an amazing speech like other longtime politicians.
Another onlooker, Jerry Johnson, said Greene looked much better giving his speech than he has in interviews. "I wasn't blown away, but he didn't do bad," Johnson said. "Considering I didn't know anything about him coming in, that's not so bad."
OK, if no one else is going to say it, I will:
He was absolutely terrible. Did the fact that he wasn't as bad as we thought he was going be, make him less terrible? No. It was violently bad. Face it, it was awful and horrible and stinky. I will admit, though, I'm conflicted. On one hand, I want to support this brother who is a legitimate candidate (like it or not) in following his dream of becoming a senator.
Another onlooker, Jerry Johnson, said Greene looked much better giving his speech than he has in interviews. "I wasn't blown away, but he didn't do bad," Johnson said. "Considering I didn't know anything about him coming in, that's not so bad."
OK, if no one else is going to say it, I will:
He was absolutely terrible. Did the fact that he wasn't as bad as we thought he was going be, make him less terrible? No. It was violently bad. Face it, it was awful and horrible and stinky. I will admit, though, I'm conflicted. On one hand, I want to support this brother who is a legitimate candidate (like it or not) in following his dream of becoming a senator.
However, should my affinity for the underdog story and my desire to see another African-American senator force me to abandon all my standards with regards to my elected officials? I mean, this guy is clearly not right in the head. I'm not asking for Obama, but couldn't he at least be average? What are we saying about ourselves if we accept and support someone who is clearly incompetent just because he's black?
Or, to many South Carolinians, is a thumb in the eye of Jim de Mint worth lowering the bar of expectations? I just don't know. This dude is embarrassingly bad and I don't know what we accomplish by not holding him to the standards all our leaders should be held to, like forming a cohesive thought without having to read it, but on the other hand, the Republicans have Sarah Palin....
Or, to many South Carolinians, is a thumb in the eye of Jim de Mint worth lowering the bar of expectations? I just don't know. This dude is embarrassingly bad and I don't know what we accomplish by not holding him to the standards all our leaders should be held to, like forming a cohesive thought without having to read it, but on the other hand, the Republicans have Sarah Palin....
Alvin Greene 2010!!!!!!
Watch Greene in action here:
Watch Greene in action here:


Comments: (13)
Add a comment
By: BG on 7/20/2010 4:34PM
He may have purchased the suit from WalMart.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: darrell on 7/20/2010 5:48PM
I don't understand what u mean?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Michael Lofton on 7/22/2010 6:54PM
....Alvin Greene can't be any worse than those who presently hold office. Alvin Green is a breath of fresh air as compared with the inept NAACP (the National Association for the Advancement of Corrupt Colored People) and/or the many incumbent misfit inept elected Black officials affiliated with the Democratic Party who are truly a disgrace to the essence of what it means to be an elected official.
http://deadwiler.blogtownhall.com/2010/07/20/the_republican_party,_rush_limbaugh,_fox_news,_town_hallcom,_tea_party_members,_etc_are_not_my_enemy!.thtml
“Rush Limbaugh Insults Black People With 'Cracker' Remark” by Dr. Boyce Watkins, PhD, BlackVoices/Black Spin
Alvin Green, the Republican Party, Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, TownHall.com, etc. are not my enemy.
In contrast, the Los Angeles Sentinel, which publishes falsehoods about Black families, specifically the Mr. and Mrs. Leon E. Lofton, Jr. family, and/or a truly deceitful and inept elected Black leadership who fit the description are indeed a proven enemy of the Black community!
The Truth, as expressed by Los Angeles Superior Court Cases C895188 and BC 385899, and other factual information.
vs.
http://ceyseau.net/files/THE_SENTINEL_IS_A_YELLOW_JOURNAL.pdf
http://ceyseau.net/files/The_Real_Uncle_Tom_s_.pdf
The “yellow journalism” of the Los Angeles
Sentinel, the largest black owned worthless newspaper in the U.S.
“.....that puts emphasis on issues concerning the African-American community and it's readers Its a highly regarded paper that significantly influences the perceptions, attitudes and buying decisions of it's readership”.
........and flocks of birds fly backwards against a strong tail wind too!
Sincerely,
Michael L. Lofton
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Riley Hart on 7/20/2010 7:27PM
Hi!
I hope that I'm not being too presumptuous and posting here when I really don't have that much to add...
In reference to the mainstream media that some would hold 'less' accountable...
This whole situation speaks volumes about our media here in SC. Is it not possible to obtain adequate media coverage of a candidate without adequate funding? In the case of Victor Rawl and Alvin Greene, I have to think probably so. According to what I've seen, Alvin Greene, the guy running against Judge Rawl, was totally discounted by the Democrats, and ignored by the corporate media, as was the judge, pretty much. While SC was marvelling at Sarah Palin and Nikki Haley, and enjoying their little tea party games, maybe one station(or paper, I forget) in Greenville(and one in Charleston, I think, actually took the time to find out who Alvin Greene was, and if you missed that one single report, you were out of luck.
In the absence of financing, I propose it is the duty of the media to inform the public about candidates, and I also propose that they failed miserably in the case of reporting on the democrats, and I, for one, would like to see a return to the Fairness Doctrine.
We deserve better than this...but we 'do' have a candidate now that is not towing around large iou's from corporations, and this may actually be a very good thing. Greene has already managed to somehow communicate his stance to me on several important issues(Kagan, fair tax, etc.)
And you know what? I agree with him on these issues. A 'conscientious' public servant does not necessarily equal a party-line towing hack.
So BLess You Brother Greene, and may the people be the winners!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: nellis on 7/20/2010 9:02PM
You are hilarious. Your fascination with us is really amazing.Not that you don't have enough retards in your race to watch. Start with George w
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Bengals Baby on 7/21/2010 11:16AM
Our fascination you can be summed up quite easily. blacks will NEVER cese to amaze you.
Report This
By: Riley Hart on 7/21/2010 8:18PM
...so true...rupert murdoch and jim demint is all i can handle!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Riley Hart on 7/21/2010 10:52PM
...correct! Rupert, Rush, Demint, whatever...
...fact remains that most peeps thoughts are controlled by this large corporate entity we know as the 'mainstream media'.
MSM is not owned by big business...they 'are' big business. S
o enough of the ad hominems, friends...i feel like I have stumbled into an astroturf site...farewell...
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Judy on 7/21/2010 7:51PM
Havent you heard? If we say that he is not so great at ANYTHING then we could be labled racist.
That is an issue that HAS to be addresed in America.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Jeannette on 7/21/2010 11:31PM
This man is set to go to court regaurding some type of criminal charges. He told the court that he was unable to pay for his own lawyer, so he was assigned a court appointed lawyer. Majically, he had enough money to post the $10,000 filing fee for the Senatorial race. Apparently he was not vetted to run for this position.
So lets see if I got it right, we have a possible criminal running for a senate seat? And the taxpayors are picking up the tab for his defense. As my granny would say, something in the milk is mot clean. Is there an investigation being launched into this shameful sham? Once convicted he will no longer qualify for the office. Where are the Feds? Do the people that hired him to pull off this stunt believe that this will work? He wins, gets disqualified, and has to step down, and some Tea Party member takes over?
Reply to this Comment | Report This