ForKai Wright, editor of ColorLines.com, a news analysis Website, all the heated debate, protests and legal wrangling over the tough Arizona immigration law that was gutted by a federal judge last Wednesday boils down to simple math.
Arizona and its immigration law equal racial profiling, and racial profiling, under any circumstance, is racist and wrong, the Brooklyn-based writer and editor told Aol. Black Voices:
"The way the law is written, it would ask police to profile people. It would actually require racial profiling, which is a situation black people are very familiar with.
"To attempt to identify someone as undocumented ... I don't see how you could write the law without racial profiling."
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled that Arizona law SB 1070, which would have empowered police to question people whom they suspect of being illegal immigrants intrudes on federal immigration enforcement.
Bolton's decision backs up the Justice Department's argument and gave the Obama administration a victory in a legal battle that will likely go to the U.S. Supreme Court, since Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has announced that she will appeal the Bolton decision.
The Justice Department lawsuit against Arizona is supported by a clause in the U.S. Constitution that grants the federal government sole authority to create and enforce immigration law, but because the federal government authorizes local governments to assist in some immigration enforcement actions, the legality of Arizona's action is uncertain.
Bolton's decision blocked a provision to require police to check immigration status if they stop someone while enforcing other laws. Also on hold is a measure to criminalize the failure of immigrants to carry registration papers.
Civil rights groups and federal lawyers had objected to those provisions, while Arizona officials defended them as necessary to fight a tide of illegal immigration.
Debate on the Arizona law has caused a divide nationwide, with supporters arguing that they want immigration law strictly enforced, while opponents like Wright see profiling as disturbing part of the measure.
Defenders of the Arizona law say that because more than a dozen of other states are considering similar legislation, a popular groundswell is emerging for stronger immigration enforcement.
Wright, however, says that an orchestrated campaign by the conservative Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) is behind the proposed legislation in many of those states:
"In these other states, the laws are being pushed by FAIR. They are not growing up from the people organically."
Bob Dane, a FAIRspokesman, told Aol. Black Voices that the Washington, D.C.–based group helped Arizona craft its law but denied that the group is behind any campaign to spread similar laws to other states.
"There is no grand scheme or lead architect to spread these laws," Dane said. "It is a grassroots movement made up of people who have had enough of illegal immigration."
As far as popular polls that show a majority of Americans supporting immigration law enforcement, Wright said that mere popularity shouldn't decide what becomes law and what doesn't.
"Some areas of law should be left to popular opinion but others areas should be more reflective of our values as a nation," Wright said. "And any law that requires police to check people in this way goes against our values."
I agree with Wright that no matter what you call it, officers will likely use some degree of racial profiling to determine people they suspect to be in the country illegally.
But is that necessarily evil?
Yes, someone in Arizona who speaks with a Spanish accent will be subjected to greater scrutiny. But let's be honest for a second. Illegal immigrants in states that border Mexico will be of Spanish descent. It's simple common sense.
If this country had an illegal immigrant problem with Sweden, then it would not be unreasonable to suspect people who spoke with a Swedish accent and had Swedish features.
I understand that people of Spanish descent who are legal citizens will be inconvenienced from time to time by officers' inquiries. If the inquiries become abusive, those incidents can be challenged in court and those officers punished. But in life, inconvenience in the name of protecting the law is a part of life.
When I drive through a drunk driving check point, I am inconvenienced every time I am forced to stop and show the officer I have not been drinking.
Asking an officer to stop illegal immigration in a state that borders Mexico without taking into account how supposed immigrants speak and what they look like is like making law enforcement wear blindfolds to do their jobs.
28-July-10 - An Ohio woman who helped counsel countless couples experiencing marital discord was found stabbed to death on Monday. The suspect is her husband.
27-July-10 - Mocienne Petit Jackson, a Netherlands woman who claims to be the child of pop sensation Michael Jackson and Diana Ross' sister, Barbara Ross, has filed documents in a Los Angeles court, according to TMZ.
23-July-10 - Could it be that Rangel simply forgot the rules? Did it slip his mind that he wasn't supposed to use his letterhead to get corporate donations for a building named after him, as charged? That's not the Charlie Rangel I knew, but that Rangel will surely be exposed when his trial starts.
23-July-10 - R&B heartthrob Brian McKnight, who was accused of being a long-lost baby daddy to a 14-year-old Florida boy, is not be the child's biological father.
22-July-10 - Staying out of trouble is not an easy feat for rapper Foxy Brown, who was arrested in Brooklyn on Wednesday for violating an order of protection, according to TMZ.
23-July-10 - A child pyromaniac is suspected of murdering his mother and siblings, setting fire to his home, and then slitting his own throat with a razor.
22-July-10 - Ieshuh Griffin is a legislative candidate from Wisconsin who seems willing to do whatever it takes to get elected. In the five words that candidates are allowed to put on the ballot to describe themselves, Griffin put the phrase, "Not the white man's b*tch."
21-July-10 - DeFarra Gaymon, a father of four and the CEO of Credit Union of Atlanta, was shot to death in a Newark, N.J. park known for male prostitution.
20-July-10 - Snoop Dogg and his wife revealed to People Magazine that the discovery that their then-6-year-old daughter, Cori, had lupus helped bring their family closer.
What did Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower have in common?
Here is something that should be of great interest for you to pass around. I didn't know of this until it was pointed out to me.
Back during The Great Depression, President Herbert Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs available to American citizens that desperately needed work..
Harry Truman deported over two million Illegal's after WWII to create jobs for returning veterans.
And then again in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower deported 13 million Mexican Nationals! The program was called 'Operation Wetback'.. It was done so WWII and Korean Veterans would have a better chance at jobs. It took 2 Years, but they deported them!
Now....if they could deport the illegal's back then - they could sure do it today?
lf you have doubts about the veracity of this information, enter Operation Wetback into your favorite search engine and confirm it for yourself.
Reminder: Don't forget to pay your taxes... 12 million Illegal Aliens are depending on you.
I feel that black people dropped the ball on this one. We need to be the loudest voice in terms of racial justice. Especially since white people are the main propagators of racist injustice.
You must not live in California. Latino/ illegal immigrants have more hangups about American Blacks than American Whites. They have many neighborhoods where you risk your life by renting or buying there. Play nice lessons are needed in these purveyors of old school racism (before the civil rights movement) primarily Latin neighborhoods.
I agree Vickiss. Brenda, This is an issue in some neighborhoods but not the result of generalized racism by undocumented immigrants. The violence is the result of gang activity (which are primarily born in USA) and drug turf where an increase in African-American residents also corresponds to a possibility of a rival gang moving in as well. The gangs that target black residents are usually associated with the Mexican Mafia prison gang/drug distributors.
It all comes down to the basic divide and conquer strategy. Although I will not further expand on this statement at this moment.
it's not just racial profiling. it's good ole fashioned redneck ignorance. there will be a lot of conversations started by AZ police that start with, "you don't look like yer from around these parts," and other genius comments that are okayed by this bill. AZ is already paying dearly--in some neighborhoods 1 out of 3 homes are now vacant and grocery stores are closing. they're a bunch of economnic geniuses.
Do you really think so? i think it's about time others picked up the ball i.e. the hispanics we tired of picking up other people's balls and running with it, while they looked the other way laughing as we are pulled over or sacked and they kept their jobs, sorry but we have had to put of with to much crap all our lives, let others see how it feels why should are backs be continually be used as stepping stones for others!
If you have nothing to hide why leave Arizona? as far as I am concerned they can profile us african americans all they want, as long as they know when they send us back to africa they are the one's paying the air fare! but as they send us back make sure they take the same exit out of our country!
The people/countries who are complaining about the possibility of increased racial profiling are the ones who simply do not want Arizona to enforce the law. Countries like Mexico, Guatemala, and other Central and South American countries want to export their poverty to the United States. These countries are not doing very much of anything to improve the lives of their citizens to where they don't have to immigrate in large numbers to the United States. I support Arizona's efforts to control the tide of illegal immigration into the state. People of all races and nationalities can immigrate legally but they don't want to. They break the law by crossing the border illegally and then quickly have children to "anchor" them to this country. Many then try to claim racism and bias when they are deported even though they are not supposed to be here in the first place. I think the President is wrong for having sued the state of Arizona. He did it for political reasons and I am thinking that it will galvanize the political right in the fall elections. The majority of Americans support the new Arizona law and the administration simply cannot ignore the will of the people.
Comments: (22)
Add a comment
By: Edatted on 8/02/2010 4:27PM
What did Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower have in
common?
Here is something that should be of great
interest for you to pass around.
I didn't know of this until it was pointed out to me.
Back during The Great Depression, President Herbert
Hoover ordered the deportation of ALL illegal aliens
in order to make jobs available to American citizens that
desperately needed work..
Harry Truman deported over two million Illegal's
after WWII to create jobs for returning veterans.
And then again in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower deported 13
million Mexican Nationals! The program was called
'Operation Wetback'.. It was done so WWII and Korean
Veterans would have a better chance at jobs.
It took 2 Years, but they deported them!
Now....if they could deport the illegal's back then - they could sure
do it today?
lf you have doubts about the veracity of this information,
enter Operation Wetback into your favorite
search engine and confirm it for
yourself.
Reminder:
Don't forget to pay your taxes...
12 million Illegal Aliens are depending on you.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: rightorwrong on 8/02/2010 4:55PM
Question is Mexico a failed state?
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Vickiss on 8/02/2010 4:52PM
I feel that black people dropped the ball on this one. We need to be the loudest voice in terms of racial justice. Especially since white people are the main propagators of racist injustice.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Brenda on 8/02/2010 9:50PM
You must not live in California. Latino/ illegal immigrants have more hangups about American Blacks than American Whites. They have many neighborhoods where you risk your life by renting or buying there. Play nice lessons are needed in these purveyors of old school racism (before the civil rights movement) primarily Latin neighborhoods.
Report This
By: CC on 8/03/2010 3:29AM
I agree Vickiss.
Brenda,
This is an issue in some neighborhoods but not the result of generalized racism by undocumented immigrants. The violence is the result of gang activity (which are primarily born in USA) and drug turf where an increase in African-American residents also corresponds to a possibility of a rival gang moving in as well. The gangs that target black residents are usually associated with the Mexican Mafia prison gang/drug distributors.
It all comes down to the basic divide and conquer strategy. Although I will not further expand on this statement at this moment.
Report This
By: david on 8/02/2010 5:04PM
it's not just racial profiling. it's good ole fashioned redneck ignorance. there will be a lot of conversations started by AZ police that start with, "you don't look like yer from around these parts," and other genius comments that are okayed by this bill. AZ is already paying dearly--in some neighborhoods 1 out of 3 homes are now vacant and grocery stores are closing. they're a bunch of economnic geniuses.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Alie on 8/02/2010 5:08PM
Do you really think so? i think it's about time others picked up the ball i.e. the hispanics we tired of picking up other people's balls and running with it, while they looked the other way laughing as we are pulled over or sacked and they kept their jobs, sorry but we have had to put of with to much crap all our lives, let others see how it feels why should are backs be continually be used as stepping stones for others!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Alie on 8/02/2010 5:12PM
If you have nothing to hide why leave Arizona? as far as I am concerned they can profile us african americans all they want, as long as they know when they send us back to africa they are the one's paying the air fare! but as they send us back make sure they take the same exit out of our country!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lila on 8/02/2010 5:37PM
The people/countries who are complaining about the possibility of increased racial profiling are the ones who simply do not want Arizona to enforce the law. Countries like Mexico, Guatemala, and other Central and South American countries want to export their poverty to the United States. These countries are not doing very much of anything to improve the lives of their citizens to where they don't have to immigrate in large numbers to the United States. I support Arizona's efforts to control the tide of illegal immigration into the state. People of all races and nationalities can immigrate legally but they don't want to. They break the law by crossing the border illegally and then quickly have children to "anchor" them to this country. Many then try to claim racism and bias when they are deported even though they are not supposed to be here in the first place. I think the President is wrong for having sued the state of Arizona. He did it for political reasons and I am thinking that it will galvanize the political right in the fall elections. The majority of Americans support the new Arizona law and the administration simply cannot ignore the will of the people.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: gerald on 8/02/2010 8:30PM
Well said,lets put an end to this regime from doing what ever they want against the will of the people just like Obamacare.
Report This