
Fox News host Glenn Beck held his march on Washington Saturday, with the theme of "restoring honor" to America. The crowd was predominantly white and mostly conservative. Tea Party members were all about, and Beck found Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. to be a reliable stage prop for what some might consider a political circus.
Sarah Palin spoke at the rally, along with Alveda King, the niece of Dr. King. Rev. Al Sharpton held a counter rally nearby and marched with a group of protesters for the three miles to a spot where a monument is planned for the slain civil rights leader. Rev. Sharpton reminded the group listening to him that we should not "mistake progress for arrival" and made the accurate assessment that those in Beck's party would have considered Dr. King's organizers to be troublemakers.
First, I should say that Beck's claim that he is attempting to restore honor to America is both odd and disingenuous. Restoring honor means that somehow you feel that honor has been lost. I am not sure if Dr. King would be comfortable with that message.
Also, one would presume that if Beck and Palin are truly celebrating the values of Dr. King, they would advocate for the issues that King stood for, such as fighting poverty, improving public schools, increasing workers' wages and putting an end to senseless wars. Beck and Palin stand for almost none of that.
The only thing Beck has in common with Dr. King is that they were both protesting the government. The difference is that King protested the government's excessive commitments to white America, while Beck is now protesting the government's reduced commitment to white entitlement. If John McCain or Hillary Clinton were in the White House, neither Beck nor Palin would feel the need to protest with such deliberate and racially agitated overtones.
Speaking of agitation, I would argue that this is part of Beck's job description. With the smirk on his chubby face, he sits with his producers each day to find something racially divisive to say, in large part because he knows that people of color see him (and others like him) to be oppressive figures to which they must remain quite sensitive. I've decided that Beck is effectively an entertainer, and to treat him as anything other than that is counterproductive. By giving him all of our attention, we are only throwing grease on to a grease fire.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and a Scholarship in Action resident of the Institute for Black Public Policy. To have Dr. Boyce's commentary delivered to your e-mail, please click here. 

Comments: (15)
Add a comment
By: Dave on 9/01/2010 2:33PM
Author writes: Also, one would presume that if Beck and Palin are truly celebrating the values of Dr. King, they would advocate for the issues that King stood for, such as fighting poverty, improving public schools, increasing workers' wages and putting an end to senseless wars. Beck and Palin stand for almost none of that."
They do advocate these issues, just not the way you like. Fighting Poverty... (taxing less so people have more money for charities and more jobs). Improving public schools.... yes, by reforming and privatizing. How many billions have we spent so far and how many improvments have we seen. None. Because teachers unions are controlled by communists who only care about destroying this great nation. Increasing wages... that's exactly what tax cuts do.
Not extending unemployment benefits out for two years so people will look for real jobs and start their own businesses.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Davd on 9/01/2010 4:21PM
And on what do you base this utter nonsense?
It is the Democrats that are racists, They evidently believe blacks are too weak to fend for themselves.
The only thing most whites don't like about Obama is his anti-Americanism, his socialism, and his liberation theology... If it weren't for those few very major defects, he would be fine.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: mckenz707 on 9/02/2010 10:46PM
http://www.angelfire.com/ak2/intelligencerreport/obama_at_bat.html
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: aeronurse on 9/03/2010 9:15PM
How ironic dear Dr. Watkins that 95% of blacks voted for Barack Obama, the most UNQUALIFIED major presidential candidate ever, black or white, despite the fact that Dr. King advocated doing the exact opposite. Didn't he once say "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."?
Obama was elected by black American voters SOLEY due to the color of his skin, which is the polar opposite of what Dr. King asked everyone in his "I Have a Dream" speech, to aspire to.
The racial divide is growing because most black Americans hate this country so much that they will elect someone, and support someone, who has absolutely no clue on how to run a country.
Obama is good at one thing, however: taking vacations during a bad economy. In fact, he left on his 9th vacation in 18 months today. No president/family has vacationed as much as the Obamas. I suppose he is trying to give the appearance of being busy, SINCE HE HAS NO CLUE about how to run a country.He should write a book called "How to Travel Well on the Taxpayer's Dime During a Global Recession"!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: fu on 9/11/2010 7:21AM
"The racial divide is growing because most black Americans hate this country "
Typical ignorant blanket statement by some simple minded fool who hates what he can't control. The racial divide is growing because of ignorant Whites like yourself. When Blacks came out in droves to support Clinton not one of you bigots questioned why Blacks voted for him. I wonder why? 95% voted for Obama, your wrong! but anyway it doesn't matter, you do not control how people vote.
Get a life , you phoney.
Report This