
Why am I talking about Sanchez in past tense? Because he was fired by CNN this week.
I doubt that you'll see the story about Sanchez's firing on CNN, but the anchor was released like an injured running back after calling Jon Stewart, host of 'The Daily Show,' a bigot. During an interview on 'Stand Up' with Pete Dominick, Sanchez spoke for nearly 20 minutes about how much of media is run by "elite Northeast liberals," who consider Hispanic journalists to be second-rate. When Dominick claimed that Stewart, who is Jewish, is a minority like Sanchez, he didn't agree. He argued that the wealth and power of the Jewish community does not put them in the same boat as black and Hispanic people.
During the interview, Sanchez said Stewart is a person with "a white liberal establishment point-of-view" who "can't relate to a guy like me." Sanchez also felt that Stewart is "upset that someone of my ilk is at, almost, his level."
Sanchez went on to say the following:
"White folks usually don't see it. But we do -- those of us who are minorities and women see it sometimes, too, from men in authority."
He went on to describe a conversation he'd had with an executive from CNN:
"I really don't see you as an anchor, I see you more as a reporter. I see you more as a John Quiñones -- you know, the guy on ABC. . . . Now, did he not realize that he was telling me. . . . An anchor is what you give the high-profile white guys, you know. . . . To a certain extent Jon Stewart and [Stephen] Colbert are the same way. I think Jon Stewart's a bigot."
CNN is an interesting network, and Sanchez's comments were interesting as well. By stating that the Jewish community is disproportionately powerful in our country, Sanchez certainly has evidence in his favor. Three of the justices on the Supreme Court are Jewish, although they represent roughly 2 percent of the population. Also, by working together on a consistent basis, Jewish Americans have created a significant amount of wealth and power, which hardly makes them an oppressed minority group.
Sanchez's comments, by noting the power of the Jewish community and differentiating it from that of Hispanics, do not appear to be the least bit anti-Semitic. For one to argue that the power base of the Jewish community is the same as that for Hispanics would be ridiculous. So, the idea that Jon Stewart is a minority in the same vein as Sanchez is ultimately incorrect. All the while, Sanchez's comments were dangerous, because he was taking on the power structure by speaking openly against racism, which is typically what most minorities implicitly agree NOT to do when they are given opportunities with major institutions. That's why you almost never hear of prominent athletes or celebrities speaking out against racism, even if they are telling the truth.
When senior administrators at Syracuse University pushed to fire me for speaking out against the university's racism three years ago, most of my black colleagues would only agree with me behind closed doors, but were terrified of speaking in public. I wasn't angered by their reaction, for it was entirely predictable in a country and university with such a well-documented history of racial oppression. The only reason I was protected from the "Out Spoken Negro Slaughter House," was because strong African Americans, like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Michael Eric Dyson and Julianne Malveaux came to my defense and refused to allow others to understate the impact of my scholarship. When people of color stick together, we can win the battle against racism. To this day, people of color who speak up must face a level of professional terrorism that keeps most of us quiet. If we are not quiet, we end up like Rick Sanchez, who is now standing in the unemployment line. I am disappointed, but not surprised, that Sanchez got the ax. The disease of racism is strong with most American institutions, and the backlash of this cultural poison can be devastating when it's honestly confronted. That, my friends, is why President Obama cannot and probably never will have a national conversation on race.
What's also interesting is that by firing Sanchez and replacing him with former New York Governor Elliot Spitzer, CNN also finds itself in a hypocritical quandary. Nearly 10 years ago, Rev. Jesse Jackson was removed from CNN for a violation of its ethics policy. Jackson, who'd just been revealed to have conceived a child outside his marriage, was immediately fired from the network.
All the while Spitzer, the man who went on a crusade against prostitution during his time as Attorney General, eventually admitted to regularly hiring prostitutes himself. This was enough to have him resign from the governor's office, but for some reason, CNN gives him a pass. One could argue that by firing a black man for having a child out of wedlock, yet overlooking another man's decision to consistently break the laws he's sworn to enforce, makes Sanchez's point quite clearly. There are privileges to being white in America, and Sanchez is probably right about the bigotry he's encountered as a journalist. CNN should not have fired Sanchez, but the truth is that they are powerful enough to not really care. That's the definition of white privilege.
One more point about CNN is that the network is in serious need of a racial overhaul. The National Association of Black Journalists has consistently called for CNN to hire more journalists of color, and while they've made some strides, we are still riding in the backseat of the corporate car. The lack of minority presence in key decisions for the network shows itself in the way the special "Black in America" continues to miss the mark on many fundamental dimensions of the black experience. Additionally, I am still waiting for the black or Hispanic version of Nancy Grace, Anderson Cooper, Wolf Blitzer or Larry King. In many ways, the executives at CNN still don't get it, and the firing of Rick Sanchez reiterates that point.
Dr. Boyce Watkins is the founder of the Your Black World Coalition and a Scholarship in Action Resident of the Institute for Black Public Policy. To have Dr. Boyce commentary delivered to your email, please click here. 

Comments: (109)
Add a comment
By: David on 10/05/2010 7:40PM
The spin doctors are at work. Some Jews are comparing Sanchez's firing to the recent resignation of Jewish Dr. Laura Schlessinger for using the N-word.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101005/media_nm/us_media_hitchens#mwpphu-post-form
There is absolutely NO comparison to what Rick Sanchez said to what that racist Dr. Laura Schlessinge said. Dr. Laura Schlessinger has proved herself to be a racist time and time again. Sanchez did NOT use any racial slurs towards Jews. Dr. Laura Schlessinger had a long history of racist attitudes towards blacks and other minorities. Rick Sanchez simply pointed out the truth that Jews do dominate the media. He did not use the K word as Schlessinger used the N word. Jon Stewart who's real name is Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz should have just left this alone. His and other Jews arrogance proves Sanchez point. Rich Sanchez was right to imply that being Jewish is a great advantage when trying to advance in the media.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: SHANNLINWO on 10/05/2010 7:40PM
The names Soledad O'Brien, Frederica Whitfield, Suzane Maulvaux was mentioned as being black. Many of black and white society may say they are black...but they are Biracial..they look no different than Rick. let them be the race they they are. They the same as OUR PRESIDENT OF THE USA..hes also BIRACIAL. I hate Rick gone ..wow!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: cultureguru on 10/05/2010 7:48PM
Hi, Stevey--
Actually, I think I did get the point, and agreed, but questioned the line of argument. (would be curious what point you are feeling I missed.)
TOTALLY AGREED: "White folks usually don't see it. But we do -- those of us who are minorities and women see it sometimes, too, from men in authority." This often has to do with how the "reward bands" at a company or institution are doled out--they favor those most like the establishment.
For next comment, was this BECAUSE OF A SPECIFIC INCIDENT WITH STEWART, OR WAS HE TALKING ABOUT STEWART AS REPRESENTATIVE OF A GROUP (Which is always dicey-as characterizing someone by a group is the basis of stereotypes and racism) "During the interview, Sanchez said Stewart is a person with "a white liberal establishment point-of-view" who "can't relate to a guy like me." Sanchez also felt that Stewart is "upset that someone of my ilk is at, almost, his level."
This is the stuff I also found curious (mostly because I think speaking out against racism is valuable and critical, and putting it in the context of comparing groups can diminish the power of the argument: Three of the justices on the Supreme Court are Jewish, although they represent roughly 2 percent of the population. Also, by working together on a consistent basis, Jewish Americans have created a significant amount of wealth and power, which hardly makes them an oppressed minority group....Sanchez's comments, by noting the power of the Jewish community and differentiating it from that of Hispanics...totally agree that the two groups are not the same, and would never count myself as an oppressed minority, but that line of argument does relate to stereotypes about Jews, who also are a diverse group of people.
As I said at the outset I was responding to the article, not to Sanchez (there's still a gap for me.)
As far as me, since you asked, I'm a white jewish liberal (ha ha), marred to a Brazilian, raising a multicultural kid, and I blog about Stereotypes in Advertising, unconscious bias and multicultural parenting at http://interculturaltalk.org. I'm not great at formulating responses quickly (as in I'll ponder this and then figure out where the gap in the argument as for me), and will probably blog about it--would be happy to do it as a give and take dialogue, if that's of interest to you.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: rosezi on 10/05/2010 11:35PM
I LOVED Rick Sanchez. He was one of the few anchors who discussed relevant issues. Unlike most westernized Hispanics, he wasn't ashamed of his culture. His comments were honest and true. A large percentage of Jews are rabidly racist, but when confronted with the issue of their racism towards blacks and other minorities, they hide behind their victimization during the Holocaust. They have been bestowed honorary "white" status. They become "whiter" and more accepted when they rail against other minorities much like the Poles did with the German nazis--became honorary Germans when the railed against the Jews. Remember that CNN is in Atlanta--Deep South Dixie with a superficial makeover. Even the so-called "black" anchors have to be "high-yellow" (the twins Don Lemon and T.J. Holmes); Soledad O'Brien's stories would be great if she didn't "soft-shoe" race issues on "Black in America." I often wonder, Where does she find these apolitical, illiterate, simple-minded black folks?" Oh, they must be native Atlantans--no short supply there. Shouldn't Rick Sanchez have "freedom of speech/press" at a news agency? His comments about Jon Stewart were on point. Stewart [and Bill Maher] are typically arrogant, flippant, condescending, over-rated lewd liberal "blow-hards" who would probably be selling bagels at Bloomingdale's if there wasn't a powerful Jewish-run media. We forget that many of the stereotypical images of blacks were perpetuated by Jewish movie moguls ["Gone With The Wind," Rochester, Step-n-Fetch It, etc.]. Jews' racial platform was: Let's target and stereotype the blacks and Hispanics so that we can take the racial hatred off ourselves. Bill Maher's racist joke about how "we" liked President Obama as a cool "basketball-player rather than a golfer" is a typical example of Jewish racisim. Their hatred doesn't stop with blacks and Hispanics--it gets even more vicious with born-again Christians. How dare us to declare that the Jesus they reject IS THE MESSIAH. They will conspire worse than nazis to persecute born-again Christians. They've become a power unto themselves and caused CNN to lose one of its finest anchors. Their hate-filled, vindictive message to Rick Sanchez (and anyone else who opposes them) is: "Don't even try to criticize one of "US;" we'll show you who has media power! They are hypocrites who are hateful, cruel, racist, and oppressive towards other minorities (they are not hateful toward whites because they want to keep their "honorary white status"), but if anyone says one word to criticize them, get ready for a Jewish jihad. Their vicious hatred is the flipside of the same Arab [Moslem] coin--they mirror each other; that's why there will never be peace in the Middle East. Now that Rick Sanchez is gone, we'll have to be assaulted by a hypocritical perverted "john" [Spitzer] who is really out of his league with a Pulitzer-prize winner, Kathleen Parker. Why didn't CNN at least replace Sanchez with just Parker? It's obvious that Southern-bred Ted Turner thinks little of Hispanics, dark-skinned blacks, and women. Spitzer is supposed to be under a rock someplace after his scandal, not teamed with a Pulitzer-prize winning journalist. What an insult to Kathleen Parker and Rick Sanchez! We'll miss you Rick--it's probably a "blessing in disguise;" you deserve better than CNN. As an African in America, I pray that you'll find something better than the southern-inspired Caucasian Noose Network.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: jane on 10/06/2010 3:03AM
Pretty funny. You make a generalization about Jews being racist then go on to talk about the Jews in the same way racists talk about blacks, hispanics, etc. Good job!
Report This
By: jane on 10/10/2010 8:36PM
I wonder why Boyd says CNN fired JEsse Jackson for his indescretions- he was never an employee. Furthermore Boyd complains that CNN hired Spitzer but fired Sanchez as though that is hypocrasy. Spitzer hired a hooker. Sanchez killed someone in a hit and run drunk driving accident and never did a day in jail. The better question is why he was hired in the first place. But Boyd is willing to overlook what a horrible person this is cause Sanchez played da race card
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: poetrysez on 10/06/2010 8:59AM
Dr Boyce,
Stephen Colbert is a democrat whose wife is the daughter of the prominent Charleston Civil Rights Litigator Joseph McGee. Colbert and Stewart are friends (besides the fact that they used to do The Daily Show together).
I was wondering why would “our brother” Rick Sanchez include Stephen Colbert in his rant about the executive and Jon Stewart...when Colbert wasn't even there? Now I know-our “brother” Rick Sanchez is a republican with an ax to grind against the democrats :{
The sad thing is that Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert "ARE NOT " perfect but they’re good guys :}
You said,
“Rick Sanchez was the coolest brother on CNN. No, he wasn't a brother in the technical sense of the word, but he's the closest we might get on CNN for quite some time. Rick was the host of 'Rick's List,' a daily CNN show that featured the latest and most relevant news and commentary. As a Cuban American, Rick related to the world in a way that was unique and authentic. He cared about issues that affected the poor and minorities, and he used his platform for a productive purpose.”
Rick Sanchez used his platform to spew vomit :{
Good riddance to Rick (hopefully-he can get one of his patsy’s to hire his “brotherly arse”
And for the record-you are who you are-an Ivy league education nor experience will ever change that ;}
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: poetrysez on 10/06/2010 9:23AM
Update!!!
On Suzzane Sanchez (Rick' wife ) face-book page-which is normally private-she gave an easy access apology to Jon Stewart and to all of the other people her husband offended by his rant. Suzzane also said that Rick and Jon had a long conversation where Rick apologized to Jon. Suzzane blames Rick's rants on the fact that for the last several months Rick has been pulling 14hr a day shifts ;{
Most people speculate that this is an attempt at damage control :{
I personally believe " our brother" is trying to bleach away the vomit ;}
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: poetrysez on 10/06/2010 10:10AM
DUI:
On December 10, 1990, Sanchez was in a neighborhood in the vicinity of Joe Robbie Stadium, driving home with his father from a football game when he struck Jeffrey Smuzinick, a pedestrian who was reportedly inebriated. Sanchez fled from the location at which the accident occurred after parking, but returned a few hours later. Whereas statements by witnesses say that Sanchez protested in a shrill tone against having his blood alcohol content checked, (because he believed that his reputation would thereby be damaged), and that he gave no help to Smuzinick, Sanchez asserted that he attempted to attract the notice of passing drivers and to render medical assistance. Smuzinick was paralyzed and, on November 2, 1995, died in an assisted living facility. A breathalyzer test by police determined that Sanchez's blood alcohol level was .15%, thus above the legal limit of .10%. Sanchez was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) and pleaded No Contest.
The interview that caused Rick to get fired:
On September 30, 2010, Sanchez was interviewed on Sirius XM's radio show Stand Up With Pete Dominick. Sanchez's interview occurred on the final day of his show in the 8 p.m. time slot and he was reportedly angry about being replaced by CNN's new Parker Spitzer talk show as well as the constant jokes made at his expense on The Daily Show. Sanchez called Daily Show host Jon Stewart a "bigot"; after questioning, Sanchez backed down from using the term and referred to Stewart as "prejudicial" and "uninformed".When queried on the issue of whether Stewart likewise belonged to a minority group on account of his Jewish ethnicity, Sanchez responded:
“Yeah, very powerless people. [Laughs] He's such a minority. I mean, you know, please. What—are you kidding? I'm telling you that everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart. And to imply that somehow they, the people in this country who are Jewish, are an oppressed minority?”]
Some media coverage suggested that Sanchez's comments insinuated that Jews controlled CNN and other networks.
Sanchez described his experiences with prejudice at news networks when he said:
“It's not just the right that does this. 'Cause I've known a lot of elite, Northeast establishment liberals that may not use this as a business model, but deep down, when they look at a guy like me, they look at a ... they see a guy automatically who belongs in the second tier and not the top tier ... White folks usually don't see it, but we do, those of us who are minorities ... Here, I'll give you my example, it's this, 'You know what, I don't want you anchoring anymore. I really don't see you as an anchor, I see you more as a reporter. I see you more as a John Quinones.' You know, the guy on ABC. That's what he told me, he told me he saw me as John Quinones. Now, did he not realize that he was telling me, 'when I see you I think of Hispanic reporters?' 'Cause in his mind, I can't be an anchor, an anchor's what you give the high profile white guys.”
In the day following his remarks,CNN announced that Sanchez was no longer employed with the company.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Me3434 on 10/06/2010 10:50AM
For those who claim that Jewish people are still being racially bullied and that they have it hard still, I think not. I have never seen ANY Jews where I from live in a poor neighborhood. They live in the upper middle class and upper class neighborhoods. I have never heard or seen any Jews speak out any other minorities receiving racial mistreatment in this country. Nothing but crickets. Jews, to me, are considered white in this country, and they do get the privilege and power associated with it. That is the truth and that is not being anti-Semitic. I hate no one, but speaking truth on racial and social economic situations in this country does not make a person racist. It is just speaking the "unspeakable" truth.
Reply to this Comment | Report This