
Thinking about New York activist Charles Barron reminds me of the old E.F. Hutton commercials of yesteryear - except when Barron speaks, I don't listen.
It's not because the subjects he tackles aren't interesting or of grave concern to black America. They frequently are. Nor is it because Barron, a former Black Panther Party member, is completely off base or isn't passionate in his quest for solutions.
Barron is usually right in identifying issues that plague black America. And I have no doubt that he really cares.
My problem with Barron is that after identifying the ill, his diagnosis for the cure is so far off the mark, it's laughable.
The latest example comes with Barron's campaign to form a black-Latino political party in New York.
To my earlier point, Barron has correctly surmised that neither political party in the city is committed to the working class, which is mostly black and Latino.
Barron is right. As is the case with the national Democratic and Republican parties, the Democrats who own the minority vote, largely take black and brown votes for granted while Republicans generally ignore minority concerns.
Look at the all-white statewide ticket of candidates presented by likely future New York governor Democrat Andrew Cuomo. It is a slap in the face to blacks and Latinos in the city and state.
But forming a political party based on race is a non-starter. First of all, black and brown people aren't a monolith. The same skin color doesn't ensure even remotely similar political concerns.
Another problem is the basic idea of basing the party on race. Keep in mind that black folks make up about 12 percent of the population nationally. So basing almost anything solely on race makes me a little nervous.
The only credit I will give Barron for his idea is that the numbers seem to indicate that minorities in New York are a sleeping political giant that, if awakened, could change the nature of politics in the city.
Blacks make up about a quarter of NYC's population. Latinos (who could identify themselves as any race) make up roughly another quarter. Possessing half the population in the city gives black and brown people a great starting point if they ever decided to unify around a candidate or issue and flex some political muscle.
Ultimately, that is where Barron's idea may have some merit.
If he can somehow get party power brokers to fear a unified minority vote and begin to address the needs of everyday people, Barron will be a hero.


Comments: (2)
Add a comment
By: BILAL on 11/01/2010 10:51PM
I don't understand why you say Charles Barron is wrong. The Freedom Party is not just for Blacks. It addresses the concerns of the working class, blacks, whites, "Latinos", other so called minorities including children, the elderly, the handicapped, progressive whites and fair minded people. That comprises more than half of the people in NY State.
He is straight forward with what he plans to do for the people. And, he has a plan that could save the state and the country.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Robert on 11/03/2010 6:07PM
So Paul,
You like White extremist agendas? Are you from the GOP? Why can't a peoples deemed as temporary citizens by the Voting Rights Act form a group that would focus on their needs? Everyone else does. So a Tea Party can form under the guise of a "Freedom Movement" for elitists to get a few thousand more on their taxes. White gays can form multicolored coalitions to exercise their right to get married? Caucasians can donate millions to propagating the "right" to get high? But if minorities get together because they share the one thing limiting them in this materialistic country it's nonsense? Then what the hell keep jumping on White tickets? I don't want gay marriage, or smoke pot, or increase my million dollar estate. I want to get a job without being turned away, I want to go outside and travel like White people. I want true freedom to gather and assemble for causes that will further life. Not please my genetalia, get high, or slate my greed. Those are White concerns. Their laws will pass for their lifestyle and you'll still be arrested for being Black, gay and a drug addict. When do brown people get a say? How would this country be if "brown" people got together and made it their way?
Reply to this Comment | Report This