
When Tea Party activists joined forces with the Good Ole Party, they thought they were on to something. With the wind at their backs, and God on their side, together with the newly reinvigorated Republican Party, world domination was inevitable.
No taxes! Complete separation of the state and federal government! No assistance for citizens during the worst economy since the Great Depression! They were finally "taking their country back."
Now it's the morning after, and the capitalist love has left the building. It seems as if the "Bridge To Nowhere" is falling down.
GOP Senator Jim DeMint (SC) said Tuesday he'll force a showdown next week with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (KY) and other old guard Republicans over "earmarked" pet projects that DeMint and other victors last week made a symbol of out-of-control deficit spending.
"Americans want Congress to shut down the earmark favor factory, and next week I believe House and Senate Republicans will unite to stop pork barrel spending," DeMint said.
Not so fast, Senator.
McConnell, in a speech to the Heritage Foundation, said giving up earmarks would provide a "blank check" to President Barack Obama because his administration would determine exclusively where money for popular programs would go. He also waxed poetic about the evils of the executive branch (code word for President Obama) with Rush Limbaugh:
"Every president would like for us to appropriate all the money and send it to them and let 'em spend it any way they want to. The earmark issue is about discretion, about an argument between the executive branch and the legislative branch over how funds should be spent. The stimulus bill that passed last year, the almost trillion-dollar stimulus bill, was riddled with executive branch earmarks."
And the bandwagon keeps rolling:
"The only winner in this thing would be Obama, and I'm just not going to cede our authority to Obama," said Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. "I can't think of anything worse than to have all these great tea party people who I worked so hard to get elected come in and cede their power and authority to the president."
In other words Tea Drinkers, the answer is, "No."
But DeMint isn't giving up so easily. With the support of various freshmen senators, he called McConnell on his hypocrisy when also speaking with Limbaugh:
"Mitch McConnell has voted twice for an earmark ban that I've proposed in the Senate. Just about every Republican who was running for the Senate this time ran on a no-earmark pledge and we've had a vote where over half of our conference had voted for the ban before. Tom Coburn and I are leading the effort for this earmark ban, and we know John Boehner has committed to it in the House. We're not gonna have earmarks, so it's really silly for some senior Republicans in the Senate to try to block it.
DeMint is in for a rude awakening. Thirty-three of 41 Senate Republicans who supported his proposal then sought earmarks in this year's unfinished roster of spending bills.
Earmarks totaled only about one-half of 1 percent of the $3.5 trillion 2010 federal budget, which is about $16 billion. They include road and bridge projects and community development grants, among many other noble causes; they have also previously included such idiocy as the $200 million-plus, later canceled "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska. The "pay to play" culture pervasive in Washington, which allows lobbyists to make huge campaign contributions in return for project funds, has left earmarks with a tainted and ambiguous reputation.
While I am curious to see how this lovers' spat turns out, I'm preparing for classic entertainment.
The Tea Party and the GOP: Dumb and Dumber on Capitol Hill.
The Three Stooges running into each other.
A testosterone fueled stand-off with neither willing to pass the rock.
This is surely the first of many collisions and all the distractions and petty political game playing should make the choice for the American people overwhelmingly simple in 2012. I almost feel sorry for them.
Almost.
With both Parties arguing for more governmental earmarks, albeit with differing motives, one thing is certain. The Tea Party, all rosy-cheeked with optimism and purpose, is realizing with friends like the Republican Party, who needs enemies?


Comments: (20)
Add a comment
By: White man on 11/12/2010 5:05PM
Hate will burn you up, Savali.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Brady on 11/12/2010 7:33PM
lady please!
Nothing here, but sour grapes!!!!!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: slick on 11/12/2010 8:16PM
Instead of concerning yourself with the tea party plantation, you should be worrying about whats happening on the democratic plantation.
It appears that Jim Clyburn doesnt know his place, the party of tolerance and racial harmony, is looking anything but.
And you want to write about the damn tea party!!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: dawggybon on 11/12/2010 11:13PM
OB did take on a lot and he knew exactly what he was taking on. Obviously way more than he could handle. If BO had ever run anything other than his mouth he would have known that the job was way over his head. Instead of focusing on creating jobs as he should have he spent all of his time on his pet projects like health care reform, nationalizing U.S.industries and generally trying to transform this country into a socialist welfare state. It cost him and your blind allegiance to him simply because he is black and might give you something that someone else has worked for diminishes the credibility of all blacks.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: emma sue on 11/15/2010 11:34PM
You wheat folks kill me. Go somewhere where your ignorance makes you shine, this is not the place. As you can see, if you can, this is BLACK VOICES.
Report This
By: bro man on 11/14/2010 9:04PM
And people say Palin no experience? What about this piece of work that`s in there now!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Cassandra on 11/15/2010 7:07PM
Why are you here? Nobody with more than a high school education believes that Palin has more experience or intelligence than our President. She needs to go back to school. Bush had no experience and he got us to where we are in 8 years not President Obama in two. Peddle that mess someplace else.
Report This
By: black conservative on 11/14/2010 9:19PM
Other World leaders at the G-20 summit in Seoul Korea Ripped Our president Obama a new one.Rejecting his solution for improving the Global economy.They said thanks but no thanks!!!Hmmmmm!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: BQI Blog on 11/15/2010 9:08AM
I'm happy to see some common sense comments here. I am new to this site and was shock to see how pathetic it is in providing Blacks with actual factual news. If we are to move forward as a people we must begin to get educated with facts. For example, Obama is an inexperienced President but his failures are not just the result of inexperience. He did not focus on jobs because he was not concerned about jobs. Rather, he wanted to fulfill a campaign promise to "fundamentally" change America. While most people thought that this was a good thing, people who really knew about OB's past knew what he meant. He is working to make America like Europe, a Social Democracy. That might sound good to some of you but if you actually had a good source of news you would know that Europe is about to go bankrupt and the countries there are a flame with riots etc. England, Greece, Portugal and others are being rioted because the government is running out of money and the social programs can't get funded. No, folks, socialism does not work. Capitalism is not perfect but it created the freest most prosperous country the world has ever had. Instead of transforming it like BO wants we need to restore and grow it.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: black conservative on 11/16/2010 3:17AM
Bravo!BQI
Report This