
In her latest attempt at pretending to have a brain, Michelle Bachmann (pictured center), of "the founding fathers eradicated slavery" infamy, has declared that First Lady Michelle Obama's quest of turning the United States into a "nanny state" is complete.
Why?
Because Mrs. Obama recommended that Mothers breast feed their babies and she supports the IRS incentive that reclassifies breast pumps as medical care purchases that could be deducted as medical expenses.

"I've given birth to five babies, and I breast fed every single one of these babies," said Bachmann to fellow conservative mouthpiece Laura Ingraham. "To think that government has to go out and buy my breast pump for my babies. You wanna talk about the nanny state? I think we just got the new definition of a nanny."
While voicing her support of breastfeeding on "Good Morning America," Bachmann argued the "tax code is used by government as social engineering."
I'm assuming the "social engineering" the Minnesota congresswoman is opposed to is ensuring that children born to low-income families have the opportunity to experience nature's milk while their mothers are forced to return to work before their cesarean scars heal to make ends meet.
Kristina Schake, Obama's communication's director, said:
"Breast feeding is a very personal choice for every woman. We are trying to make it easier for those who choose to do it."
And Republicans went wild!
Accusations of governmental overreach and medical bureaucracy are running rampant because our First Lady supports healthier children. The Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program offers breast pumps for free or discounted prices, but not every woman qualifies for this assistance.
Meanwhile, the benefits of breast feeding are extensive.
From healthier infant weight gain to reduced breast cancer risk for Mothers, the question should not be why is the IRS attempting to reclassify pumps as a medical expense, but what took them so long?
I continue to find it baffling that a party that attempts to redefine rape and cut social services, including the ending of unemployment benefits, pounces on every opportunity to oppose incentives for lower-income families to actually carry pregnancies full-term.
Isn't this what you want, GOP? Strong, healthy, children?
Or is that only the goal as long as the government doesn't include actually caring about these children after they're born?
Just because it's being supported by an African-American woman from the South Side of Chicago, whose husband ruined your political dreams of world domination, doesn't make this measure any less admirable.
Pretend Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan supports the incentive if it makes you sleep better at night, but for the love of all that's sacred, stop with the hypocritical, self-righteous indignation.
Mrs. Obama has recalled how she breast fed now-9-year-old Sasha, and I've successfully nursed my two children. While I would never judge any woman who chooses to use formula, I wholeheartedly support the government's incentive during this vital stage of infant development, and if Bachmann is any kind of woman or Mother, she should as well.
To paraphrase Barney Frank, it is becoming blatantly obvious that "the modern Republicans believe that life begins at conception and ends at birth."
If the GOP is not against using a political platform to ensure that children don't "die," it's only right that they put equal effort in to ensuring they have every opportunity to live.
While voicing her support of breastfeeding on "Good Morning America," Bachmann argued the "tax code is used by government as social engineering."
I'm assuming the "social engineering" the Minnesota congresswoman is opposed to is ensuring that children born to low-income families have the opportunity to experience nature's milk while their mothers are forced to return to work before their cesarean scars heal to make ends meet.
Kristina Schake, Obama's communication's director, said:
"Breast feeding is a very personal choice for every woman. We are trying to make it easier for those who choose to do it."
And Republicans went wild!
Accusations of governmental overreach and medical bureaucracy are running rampant because our First Lady supports healthier children. The Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program offers breast pumps for free or discounted prices, but not every woman qualifies for this assistance.
Meanwhile, the benefits of breast feeding are extensive.
From healthier infant weight gain to reduced breast cancer risk for Mothers, the question should not be why is the IRS attempting to reclassify pumps as a medical expense, but what took them so long?
I continue to find it baffling that a party that attempts to redefine rape and cut social services, including the ending of unemployment benefits, pounces on every opportunity to oppose incentives for lower-income families to actually carry pregnancies full-term.
Isn't this what you want, GOP? Strong, healthy, children?
Or is that only the goal as long as the government doesn't include actually caring about these children after they're born?
Just because it's being supported by an African-American woman from the South Side of Chicago, whose husband ruined your political dreams of world domination, doesn't make this measure any less admirable.
Pretend Laura Bush or Nancy Reagan supports the incentive if it makes you sleep better at night, but for the love of all that's sacred, stop with the hypocritical, self-righteous indignation.
Mrs. Obama has recalled how she breast fed now-9-year-old Sasha, and I've successfully nursed my two children. While I would never judge any woman who chooses to use formula, I wholeheartedly support the government's incentive during this vital stage of infant development, and if Bachmann is any kind of woman or Mother, she should as well.
To paraphrase Barney Frank, it is becoming blatantly obvious that "the modern Republicans believe that life begins at conception and ends at birth."
If the GOP is not against using a political platform to ensure that children don't "die," it's only right that they put equal effort in to ensuring they have every opportunity to live.



Comments: (41)
Add a comment
By: eldohill on 2/18/2011 1:45PM
what do you expect from another stupid ignorant, racist republican
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: R.W. on 2/18/2011 10:04PM
Eldohill, I don't know about the racist charge, but Michele Bachmann certainly portrays the other two adjectives (or traits) you used to describe her.
Report This
By: stare k on 2/20/2011 7:48AM
Toeldohill I agree 200% NOW SPEAKING OF JUDGING
PEOPEL FRIST SHE NEED TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR & JUDGE
THE PRUNE FACE ( wrinkle ) WHITE MONKEY THAT SHE IS .
Report This
By: Ellice on 2/20/2011 9:13AM
I agree! If she watch PRESIDENT OBAMA wipe his behind wrong she will disagree. Michelle Big Mouth will say anything just to be heard. Listen, it's the republican party's job to disagree with OBAMA on every issue, because they just don't like him. Where were they when Bush was putting this country in debt, not being a leader during the Hurricane Katrina tradegdy, starting a war on false information just so he can pretend like he served our country before and giving tax breaks to the rich?
Report This
By: ABRAHAM STEIN on 2/20/2011 5:21PM
MICHELLE BACHMAN'S ONLY valid POLITICAL ISSUE AND
PROBLEM IS HOW CAN SHE SUCK EVERY REPUBLICAN'S
WEENIE AND EAT SARA PALIN'S DISEASED VAGINA. PERIOD
Report This
By: stare k on 2/20/2011 8:02PM
To eldohill. The bottom line the Obamas are BLACK
None of them will admit to it .Why ? They want us to think that they are in love with black ,& color is just a word . All blacks are looking for ahand out .LIES ,LIES. Frist of all she need to look in the mirrow & judge how many prune lines is in her face .If u REPULIBICAN alone withh the poor trailor trash don't like us because we are in all colors ,that GOD created .I suggest that you all talk to him . We did not make our selves jue as u did not make your self .
Report This
By: acura2010 on 2/18/2011 1:53PM
Why the media giving racists bigots like Bachmann and Palin the mic? These are two unhappy bigot women who have five children @ home who desperately needs their mother.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: weaves on 2/18/2011 3:19PM
oh, ok, so because she is white, she is automatically a racist? I call you a racist for saying that. If this was Condi Rice speaking, would you think differently or would you call her an Uncle Tom.? Get over yourselves. She is simply stating that it is not the governments responsibility to take care of a womans breast pump. Low-income familes (black OR white) already get enough government assistance that breast pumps are an un-needed additional cost. Start thinking logically and not with colors and you'll start to see a change in this country.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: bugs hunter on 2/18/2011 7:15PM
Where did the author refer to anyone being a racist?
You and most whites are so hell-bent on repeating that stupid racist refrain, we automatically know it's a lie you repeat in an attempt to make it "real"! You are sooooooooooo phony!...... and racist!
That's how stupid and sinister white racists are!
Go to any redneck blog and you'll see,it's the only line they know!They must think if they repeat it often enough, maybe it will become believable?...an old Hitler's propagande trick!
Report This
By: ibk2u419 on 2/20/2011 9:44AM
Logically speaking, you can't actually (or factually) comment on what the needs are of all the low income families in this country. What can be said for certain is that low income families, by definition, usually can use all of the assistance they can get... and if there is some additional aid available for improving their health, it is worth the cost (which would be minimal compared to the cost of say... paying for an invasion of Iraq). ;-)
Report This