
What does it mean when a local Boy Scout has more of a sense of justice and decency than the federal government?
Unfortunately, this is the case in Folsom, Calif., where 36 African Americans are buried under headstones that read:
"Moved from N*gger Hill Cemetery by U.S. Government - 1954."
In 1849, free and enslaved African-American men were the first to discover gold in the region. After these men died, they were buried in Negro Hill Cemetery, but a flooding from the local Folsom Dam made the government relocate the men's remains to Mormon Island Relocation Cemetery in 1954.

This wouldn't seem like anything noteworthy except that with each pouring of the headstone, government officials had "Negro" changed to "N*gger." And so it was for more than half a century until an unnamed Boy Scout from Troop 645 decided to challenge the racial epithets on his own.
The courageous scout reportedly went to the trouble of getting funding to change the headstones, but since the cemetery is a historic landmark, officials are now trying to ascertain who has the legal authority to alter them.
This Boy Scout needs to be named and congratulated for having the audacity to question an insult that many were far too comfortable with.
The fact that someone under the government of Dwight D. Eisenhower specifically ordered the slur suggests a calculated, lasting attempt to not only dishonor and discredit the positive contributions of these black men to society but also disgrace and insult an entire race of people, who after hundreds of years of building this country under brutal and dehumanizing conditions, actually deserve to be heralded and honored throughout this land and world.
In addition, those 36 men need to have their stories told.
I don't know if all of the markers say, "Unknown," but someone needs to make an effort to know them: Who were they? Where did they come from? What was African-American life like at the time? This information should be prominently displayed for all to see and the city of Sacramento should go to great pains to make it a must-see site for school children everywhere to visit.
Until these changes are made, the state of California should be shamed by media that such a stain of history is allowed to endure.
Watch the story about the blasphemous headstones here:


Comments: (36)
Add a comment
By: Cassandra Floyd,M.S. on 5/03/2011 2:13PM
We cannot and should not "whitewash" our history. This is how we were defined in this country. Our response should not be to clean it up or clear it off. Let the world see and remember our kidnapping, rape and enslavement and our children see and remember it as well. Then we should respond and live by the rallying cry, "never again". A luta continua.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: alie on 5/03/2011 5:45PM
I agree this is part of our national history on how white americans regarded blacks as less than, don't you dare erase our history, in the england there was a black queen who the artist of the day painted white, yet she was described as black by all accounts, queen philippa and queen charlotte.
Report This
By: taskmaster on 5/06/2011 3:38AM
Hothing has change from then to now,
Report This
By: Snoop on 5/10/2011 4:57PM
To say that we must keep this disdainful language for the sake of it's 'historical value' is absurd. If that were the case, then ALL descendants of slaves would still be called 'Negroes, coloreds, etc. and our names would either be proceeded by or followed by 'slave' or 'descendant of slave'. As someone who's educated, you should already know that. If you believe in retaining historical precedences so bad, then add "slave" to your name and title. Otherwise, you're just picking and choosing when and when not the rules ought be applied. Further you're being blindly contradictory in your posturing.
By removing that word, which BOTH of my parents fought hard to change in the 60's & 70's, that does not 'white-wash' history. The information and history will still be available, rewording it gives these men the dignity they were so callously denied/ robbed of when their tombs were relocated. CHANGE does not mean 'whitewash' and showing proper respect does mean 'forgetting'. These men should NOT have such blight corrupting their legacies.
Report This
By: Ingrid Malik-Connor on 5/03/2011 2:38PM
Those who do not learn History are doomed to repeat it. I think the headstones should stay as they are as a reminder of how far we have come. As a nation, we are not perfect but we are learning. WE cannot know where we're going if we forget where we've been.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Inez Cooper on 5/04/2011 1:48PM
You are so right.
Report This
By: shakah on 5/03/2011 2:59PM
I do not think it should be washed away. Leave it as it is. This is history and leave it as it should be.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: shakah on 5/03/2011 3:10PM
I think we should leave it as it is. Or we will be bound to repeat our history again. We do not change the obelisks the pyramids or Neferttiti. Our history has pain and richness. It is what keeps us strong and stronger everyday. We must always remember our history, whether it be good or bad. The Father says to trust no man and know your enemies.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Tom on 5/03/2011 7:15PM
I agree, leave them as they are. They seem appropriate to me, and what a waste of money it would be to change them. They already wasted money in the 1950's moving the graves and putting these headstones on them, enough wasted money already.
Report This
By: Viejita on 5/03/2011 6:58PM
If they are left as is, there should be added a marker telling the story of when and why they were labeled that way. The dates of death on the stones would mislead visitors into thinking that the deceased and/or their relatives requested to be described that way.
Reply to this Comment | Report This