
The hue and cry came swiftly and from almost every corner of the web. Black women, white women, Asian and Latino women all blasted evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa for his controversial article that claimed black women were scientifically less attractive than women of other races.
Petitions were circulated. Anger was fomented. Even white guys in his field came out of the woodwork denouncing his flawed science. And soon Kanazawa's article, "Why Are African-American Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?" was pulled from the 'Psychology Today' website where it was originally published, and he was fired from his blogging gig there and booted from his teaching job at the London School of Economics.
The dust has since settled and the balance of the galaxy seems to have been restored.
But there's one thing that continues to nag. As all heck was breaking loose, one group stayed largely out of the fray: Black Men.
Perhaps it's because the clearly insane and indefensibly racist report Kanazawa attempted to cloak in "science" was so ridiculous that it didn't even warrant a response en masse from the fellas. Or, in some sadly self-loathing way, black men weren't overly riled because many might harbor a deeply internalized belief that black women are indeed universally less attractive.

The even sadder reality is that our women's femininity, no less their beauty, has been attacked since way back. Long before the headscarf was a fashion accessory for the corner store set, slave owners and white gentry demanded that black women cover their heads because their hair was said to be so repulsive. And no offense to black women who prefer a weave or a relaxer to their own natural hair, but whole industries, billion dollar industries, have been built solely on providing ways for black women to appear other than their natural selves.
There are countless anecdotes of assaults on black beauty - from the fetishization of Latin-Asian-Mediterranean-looking-light-skinned video models with the long hair and less than African features (as beautiful as these women might actually be), to the brothers who will only sport a white girl on their arm or the lingering vestiges of our colonial-inspired color complexes (re: Bill Duke's forthcoming documentary Dark Girls).
But going back to the original premise, we spoke with three black men about Kanazawa's theory, the fallout and why black men didn't rise up en (virtual) masse in support of beautiful black women.
First up, the Rev. Nicholas Richards, a single, 27-year-old assistant minister at Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem. Richards said there was no major outcry from black men because of unresolved issues between black men and women, and an internalized perception of beauty driven by media and white society.
"Black women to me are the most beautiful creatures in existence," Richards said. "However, I do believe there are tremendous strains on black male and female relationships and perceptions of each other."
He continued: "We have a lot of work to do to change the perception that we have of our women and to reclaim the glorious image that we once held. When you see a black woman you see her as God saw her in Genesis 1:26, you see her as good, you don't see her as someone outside the normal, not someone that you're trying to make more normal.
"The issue for us is that white is normal and anything other than white is not normal. And we live trying to be more normal. I think what black men have to do is really begin to see black women as normal and good and beautiful in themselves, not against the backdrop of any other race or identity, but that black women are good."
Bob Meadows, 44 (pictured below), a deputy editor at 'Essence,' who has been married for nearly seven years to a black woman, said, "when you hear something so ridiculous there shouldn't be a response," and that "black women are very strong, they know ridiculousness when they see it."

"I think that black men love black women," added Meadows. "Your mother is your first standard of beauty, not the white woman on TV." Datwon Thomas, 36, (pictured below) the editorial director of 'Vibe' and the founder of 'King' magazine (something of a 'Maxim' for black men), said that his initial response to the whole thing was, "this is some bull shit and I can't even give it my attention."

Part of the reason he started King was because mainstream publications never showed sexy black women in the same light as the Claudia Schiffers of the world. He didn't address the Kanazawa issue publicly, but said he does his best at home to reinforce to his daughters that they are beautiful.
"I just over love them," he said. "As long as they are going to know me, they're always going to know that my dad loves me no matter what, no mater how I look. They'll always have that."
The mess that Kanazawa put out there is hurtful, and complicated. There are issues of identity, color and concepts of beauty, issues that are complicated further by a difficult history of discrimination and hate, burdens of being black (and a woman) in America.
But as far as black men's response to a claim that black women are less attractive than other women, perhaps Datwon Thomas sums it up best: "I don't think it was for a lack of black men feeling the need to respond. There's no way you can feel like that if you are a black dude who grew up in a black household," said Thomas, who has been married to a black woman for 11 years and has "three beautiful black little girls" at home. "That's not something you think about. I don't think like that."


Comments: (311)
Add a comment
By: Michael "JUICE" McCrary on 6/10/2011 7:46PM
To me it dosen'tmater waht others think. There's not a woman better than a black woman.(peroid)
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: datroofhoits on 6/10/2011 7:49PM
Attractiveness is more than physical beauty. As I recall, the article said black women had lower IQs and were fatter than average. (There was one other thing, I forgot what it was.) Those are both true. As I recall, if you based attractiveness on what he wrote about, you could conclude that black women were less attractive.
Personally, I think it is a shame the man got fired for writing what he thought. It's not free speech if you're not free to express yourself, whether he was right or wrong. How can you hold to a belief if it is never challenged? In any event, you can keep people from saying something, but you cannot keep people from thinking something, and if people cannot express (what might be considered to be) hateful thoughts verbally, they will act on them in some other, more violent, manner.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Mike on 6/12/2011 6:16PM
When you have a scientist cliaming to have scientific proof that black females are aren't as attractive as others, that should cause a problem for him. If a skin doctor had claim his research proved that blacks are genetically inferior and more proned to commit violent crimes against woman and children, would you still defend his right for free speech!
Report This
By: Interesting on 6/11/2011 9:22PM
Just to clarify, there was no free speech constitutional issue here. People always use legal jargon without fully understanding it. Freedom of speech means freedom from legal prosecution essentially. You can say whatever you want (for the most part) and not get prosecuted and sent to jail. In this case he wrote an article and nothing happened to him except being fired from his job. As an analogy if an individual says something controversial and he/she represents a company, the company has every right to fire that individual. It would be like forcing an entity to continue to work with someone who is a liability to their growth. His firing was probably a business move to maintain the integrity of that organization. No freedom of speech issue here, sorry.
Report This
By: Greg D. on 6/12/2011 5:56PM
@datroofhoits,
I didn't see where Dr. Satoshi Kanazawa's speech was being censored by a governmental entity.
The right to free speech ONLY protects you from the government or government entities dictating what you say or don't say. So, it not a violation of his right to free speech. Also, African American women have a higher rate of graduation from secondary education than white women and black men.
Report This
By: sspsllc on 6/12/2011 6:47PM
I am a small petite black woman with an IQ of 132, eight notches from the highest score of 140. Where does that put me on Kanazawa's color wheel? Signed, "Hit dogs do holler."
Report This
By: sspsllc on 6/12/2011 7:03PM
He is from China and worked for the London School of Economics. No "rights" to "free speech" over there; they are not subject to our constitution. It just got published in an American magazine, but did not originate here. Kanazawa had published before on "looks-ism" for London publications, not in the USA.
Report This
By: sspsllc on 6/12/2011 7:03PM
He is from China and worked for the London School of Economics. No "rights" to "free speech" over there; they are not subject to our constitution. It just got published in an American magazine, but did not originate here. Kanazawa had published before on "looks-ism" for London publications, not in the USA.
Report This
By: lee on 6/13/2011 6:17PM
datroofhoits - you got to be has dumb has the ass that wrote that article....
Report This
By: Raphael on 6/13/2011 4:33PM
@sspsllc: Ummm...140 is not the highest score on an IQ test. I scored 147, and that's still not close to the maximum one can score.
As for me, I'm ALL FOR racial mixin'! That's how I believe God REALLY wants us to be! Really, though, I love women of all colors. You are ALL beauties in my book! :-D
Report This